Inference about the Population Kurtosis with Confidence: Parametric and Bootstrap Approaches

Authors

  • Guensley Jerome Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Florida International University, Miami, FL, 33196, USA
  • B.M. Golam Kibria Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Florida International University, Miami, FL, 33196, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2018.07.03.3

Keywords:

Beta Distribution, Bootstrap Techniques, Confidence Interval, Kurtosis Parameter, Simulation.

Abstract

This paper considers some classical and bootstrap methods in constructing confidence intervals for the kurtosis parameter of a distribution. The bootstrap techniques used are: Bias-Corrected Standard Bootstrap, Efron’s Percentile Bootstrap, Hall’s Percentile Bootstrap and Bias-Corrected Percentile Bootstrap. The performance of these estimators is compared through confidence intervals by determining the average width and probabilities of capturing the kurtosis parameter of a distribution. We observed that the parametric method works well in terms of coverage probability when data come from a normal distribution, while the bootstrap intervals struggled in constantly reaching a 95% confidence level. When sample data are from a distribution with negative kurtosis, both parametric and bootstrap confidence intervals performed well, although we noticed that bootstrap methods tend to have shorter intervals. When it comes to positive kurtosis, bootstrap methods perform slightly better than classical methods in the sense of high coverage probability. For illustration purposes, two real life health related data are analyzed.

References

Van Belle G,et al. Biostatistics: a methodology for the health sciences. John Wiley & Sons, Watkins, 2004; Vol. 519: p. 51. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471602396 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/0471602396

Westfall PH. Kurtosis as peakedness, 1905–2014. RIP. The American Statistician 2014; 68(3): 191-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2014.917055 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2014.917055

Cramér H. Mathematical methods of statistics. Princeton University Press. Princeton 1991.

DeCarlo LT. On the meaning and use of kurtosis. Psychological Methods 1997; 2(3): 292. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.3.292 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.3.292

Fisher RA. The moments of the distribution for normal samples of measures of departure from normality. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. The Royal Society 1930; Vol. 130. 812: pp. 16-28. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1930.0185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1930.0185

Joanes DN, Gill CA. Comparing measures of sample skewness and kurtosis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series D (The Statistician) 1998; 47(1): 183-189. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9884.00122 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9884.00122

Bruin J. newtest: command to compute new test @ONLINE 2011. URL: http://stats.idre. ucla.edu/stata/ado/analysis/.

DiCiccio TJ, Efron B. Bootstrap confidence intervals. Statistical Sciences 1996; 11(3): 189-228. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1032280214 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1032280214

Efron B. Better bootstrap confidence intervals. Journal of the American statistical Association 1987; 82(397): pp. 171-185. BIBLIOGRAPHY 82 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1987.10478410

Efron B. Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. The annals of Statistics 1979; 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344552 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344552

Efron B. Nonparametric standard errors and confidence intervals. Canadian Journal of Statistics 1981; 9(2): 139-158. https://doi.org/10.2307/3314608 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3314608

Hall P. The bootstrap and Edgeworth expansion. Springer Science & Business Media 2013.

Banik S, Kibria BMG. A simulation study on some confidence intervals for the population standard deviation. SORT 2011; 35(2): 83-102.

Moore D, McCabe GP, Craig BA. Introduction to the Practice of Statistics. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York 2012

Downloads

Published

2018-06-25

How to Cite

Jerome, G., & Kibria, B. G. (2018). Inference about the Population Kurtosis with Confidence: Parametric and Bootstrap Approaches. International Journal of Statistics in Medical Research, 7(3), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2018.07.03.3

Issue

Section

General Articles