Questions of Development of Students’ Functional Literacy

Authors

  • Zhainagul Beisenova L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Nur-Sultan, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Kulanda Kanafiyeva University of Information Technology and Business, Nur-Sultan, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Saltanat Moldakhmetova S. Seifullin Kazakh AgroTechnical University, Nur-Sultan, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Zhanar Kuandykova L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Nur-Sultan, Republic of Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2020.08.03.1

Keywords:

Qualified specialists, educational process, law schools, educational motivation, critical thinking.

Abstract

Objective: The article is devoted to the definition of critical thinking skills, the stimulation of critical thinking in language teaching. One of the requirements of the global linguistic globalisation is functional literacy, which involves a degree of native languages. Today the objective historical principal is the nomination of more serious requirements to the knowledge level and skills of students.

Background: In the current realities, the educational process in higher education institutions should focus on building skills that contribute to the implementation of the concept of “education throughout life”. It is obvious that the main condition for the formation of such skills is the presence of a certain level of functional literacy.

Method: To test the hypothesis of the research and achieve the objectives the following methods have been used: theoretical: analysis of pedagogical, philosophical, psychological literature on research; empirical: observation, analysis of results of operations, testing, conducting formative, notes and summarising experiments; statistical: mathematical processing of experimental results.

Results: The results of experimental work have shown positive changes in all indicators of the activity component. Significantly reduce the number of students who own conclusions and explanations skills at a low level.

Conclusion: To ensure the efficiency of the formation of functional literacy encourage students to apply the technology of critical thinking, which can be used to form the organisational, intellectual and other skills, including the ability to carry out activities of teaching independently.

References

Paul RW. Critical and reflective thinking: A philosophical perspective. In: B. Jones, L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of Thinking and Cognitive Instruction. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1990; pp. 445-494.

Halpern D. Psychology of critical thinking. St. Petersburg: Peter 2000.

Galskova N, Gez N. Theory of teaching foreign languages. Linguodidactics and methodology. Moscow: Academiya, 2007.

Heidegger M. What is called thinking? Moscow: Academic Project, 2007.

Lipman M, Sharp A, Oscanyan F. Philosophy in the classroom. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2010.

Plaus S. Psychology of evaluation and decision making. Moscow: Filin, 1998.

Sticht T. Functional literacy skills curriculum for the Secondary School. In Paper for the American Educational Research Association Meetings. Washington, DC: Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse 1974.

Denny K, Harmon C, O’Sullivan V. Functional literacy, educational attainment and earnings: a multi-country comparison 2003. Retrieved from: https://www.econstor.eu/ bitstream/10419/72411/1/386346992.pdf.

Arko A, Addison K. The impact of functional literacy on socio-economic lives of beneficiaries: A case study of the Agona District of Ghana. Edo Journal of Counselling 2009; 2(2): 199-213. https://doi.org/10.4314/ejc.v2i2.60860

Gershunsky B. Literacy for the 21st century. Soviet Pedagogy 1990; 4: 729-736.

Matskevich V, Krupnik S. Functional literacy. In: A. Gritsanov (Ed.), World Encyclopedia: Philosophy. Minsk: Harvest, 2001; pp. 107-115.

Gubanova M, Lebedeva E. Teacher and student: competence, proficiency, technology. Kemerovo: KRIPKiPRO, 2013.

Dewey J. Psychology and the pedagogy of thinking. Moscow: Mir, 1915.

Lipman M. Critical thinking – what can it be? Educational Leadership 1988; 46(1): 38-43.

Temple C. Critical thinking and critical literacy. Thinking Classroom 2005; 6(2): 15-20.

Malkova Z. John Dewey – philosopher and educator-reformer. Pedagogy 1995; 4: 95-104.

Clarin M. Innovative models of teaching in foreign pedagogical searches. Moscow: Arena 1994.

Klooster D. What is critical thinking? Thinking Classroom 2001; 4: 36-40.

Leicester M. Teaching critical thinking skills. Glasgow: Bell & Bain Ltd 2010.

Temple C, Meredith K, Steele J. How children learn: a statement of first principles. Geneva: Reading & Writing for Critical Thinking Project 1997.

Rychen DS, Salganik LH. Key competencies for a successful life and well-functioning society. Göttingen: Hogrefe Publishing, 2003.

Sanchez A, Ruiz M. Competence-based learning. A proposal for the assessment of generic competences. Bilbao: University of Deusto 2008.

Meadows D. Thinking in systems: a primer. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing 2008.

Cummins J. Empowering minority students: A framework for intervention. Harvard Educational Review 1986; 56(1): 18-37. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.56.1.b327234461607787

Polat E, Buharkina M. Modern pedagogical and information technologies in the educational system. Moscow: Academiya, 2007.

Zeer E. Psychology of vocational education. Moscow: Academiya, 2013.

Simon H, Kaplan C. Foundations of cognitive science: overview, 1988. Retrieved from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar. org/d216/8a03943065f56c9ff4f19e3c165f56e920e2.pdf.

Stahl N, Stahl R. We can agree after all! Achieving consensus for a critical thinking component of a gifted program using the Delphi technique. Roeper Review 1991; 14(2): 79-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199109553392

Moore T. Critical thinking: Seven definitions in search of a concept. Studies in Higher Education 2013; 38(4): 506-522. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.586995

Downloads

Published

2020-09-14

How to Cite

Beisenova, Z., Kanafiyeva, K., Moldakhmetova, S., & Kuandykova, Z. (2020). Questions of Development of Students’ Functional Literacy. Journal of Intellectual Disability - Diagnosis and Treatment, 8(3), 263–269. https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2020.08.03.1

Issue

Section

Thematic Issue - Special Education Paradigm in Contemporary Vital Environment at Educational Institutions