The Model of a System for Criteria-Based Assessing of Students' Functional Literacy and its Developmental Impact

Authors

  • Ainur Ye. Sagimbaeva Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Sailaugul Avdarsol Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Olga Yu. Zaslavskaya Moscow City Pedagogical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
  • Gulnar S. Arynova Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Aigerim S. Baimakhanova Khoja Akhmet Yassawi International Kazakh-Turkish University, Turkistan, Republic of Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2020.08.03.11

Keywords:

Criteria-based assessment, student success rate, computer literacy, self-assessment procedures, integrated information.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this article is to compile a model of a system for assessing students' functional literacy based on a criteria-based approach.

Background: Everyone use a traditional five-point grading system to assess students' activities, but using it, it's not always possible to objectively evaluate student work. Therefore, the authors use the criteria-based student assessment system in our lessons.

Method: Criteria based assessment involves a mechanism that allows evaluating students more objectively. Assessing the activities of students in the lesson becomes democratic, since a student is the subject of his training, and a teacher does not play the role of a “judge” in grading.

Results: As a result of the study, it was revealed that the assessment system makes it possible to determine how successfully one or another educational material is mastered, or a certain practical skill is formed. At the same time, it is advisable to take a mandatory minimum as a reference point.

Conclusion: The criteria-based assessment system is completely transparent in the sense of how to give formative and summative grades, as well as the goals for which these grades are put. It is also a means of diagnosing learning problems, providing and ensuring constant contact between a teacher, student, and parents. Based on the conducted practical experiment, the effectiveness of the model of the system for assessing the functional literacy of students based on the criteria-based approach in computer science has been proved.

References

Vygotsky, LS. Educational psychology. Moscow: AST, 2012.

Amonashvili ShA. Fundamentals of humane pedagogy. In 20 books. Book 4. Moscow: Amrita, 2012.

Krasnoborova AA. Criteria-based assessment as a means of improving the quality of education in the logic of the competency-based approach. Portrait of a student in the focus of International Baccalaureate programs. Education that will make the world a better place. Perm: Perm State Pedagogical University, 2009.

Romanov YuV. Assessment system: the experience of reflection and use. In: MA Pinskaya (Ed.). Formative assessment: classroom assessment. Moscow: Logos M 2010; pp. 177-184.

Demidovich EA. Experience in implementing the competency-based approach to the training of special educators in the secondary vocational education system. Special Education 2011; 3: 98-104.

Sagimbaeva AE, Zaslavskaya OYu, Avdarsol S. Criteria-based approach to the assessment of educational achievements in the Republic of Kazakhstan. In: Collection of the XI International Scientific and Practical Conference Shamovskie pedagogical readings of the scientific school of Educational Systems Management “Modern vectors of educational development: relevant problems and promising solutions”. Moscow: Moscow State Pedagogical University 2019; pp. 515-519.

Dolenc K, Aberšek B, Aberšek MK. Online functional literacy, intelligent tutoring systems and science education. Journal of Baltic Science Education 2015; 14(2): 162-171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/15.14.162

Quarstein VA, Peterson PA. Assessment of cooperative learning: a goal-criterion approach. Innovative Higher Education 2001; 26(1): 59-77. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010938521365 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010938521365

Bezrukova VS. Fundamentals of spiritual culture (encyclopedic dictionary of a teacher). 2000. Available at: https://studylib.ru/doc/571133/osnovy-duhovnoj-kul._tury.-e-nciklopedicheskij-slovar._-pedagoga.

Rusinova LP. The pedagogical dictionary by topics. 2010. Available at: https://www.psyoffice.ru/slovar-s181.htm

Oleshkov MYu, Uvarov VM. The modern educational process, basic concepts and terms. Moscow: Kompaniya Sputnik 2006.

Berkimbayev KM, Sarybayeva AKh, Usembayevа IB, Ramankulov ShZh. Тeaching of using information and computer technology for preparation of competitive specialists. In: Materials of the ІІ international “Research and practice conference”. Westwood: Publishing office Accent Graphics communications 2013; pp. 425-429.

Polat ES, Bukharkina MYu, Moiseeva MV, Petrov AE. New pedagogical and information technologies in the education system. Moscow: “Academia” Publishing Centre, 2001.

Sagimbaeva AE, Avdarsol S. Assessment of students’ functional literacy in computer science based on a criteria-based approach. Vestnik-Khabarshy. Series of “Physics and Mathematics” 2019; 4(68): 182-189.

Veriaev AA, Nechunaeva MN, Tatarnikova GV. Functional literacy of students: representations, critical analysis, measurement. News of Altai State University 2013; 2-2(78): 13-17. https://doi.org/10.14258/izvasu(2013)2.2-01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14258/izvasu(2013)2.2-01

Badia A, Campos LCh. Teachers learn about student learning assessment through a teacher education process. Studies in Educational Evaluation 2018; 58: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.05.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.05.004

Nikou SA, Economides AA. The impact of paper-based, computer-based and mobile-based self-assessment on students' science motivation and achievement. Computers in Human Behavior 2016; 55: 1241-1248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.025

Sangiorgio V, Uva G, Aiello MA. A multi-criteria-based procedure for the robust definition of algorithms aimed at fast seismic risk assessment of existing RC buildings. Structures 2020; 24: 766-782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.01.048 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.01.048

Kilpatrick JR, Wolbers KA. Beyond the red pen: A functional grammar approach to evaluating the written language of deaf students. Psychology in the Schools 2020; 57(3): 459-474. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22289 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22289

Keizer E. Modelling stance adverbs in grammatical theory: tackling heterogeneity with functional discourse grammar. Language Sciences 2020; 12(7): Article number 101273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101273 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2020.101273

Jaakma K, Kiviluoma P. Auto-assessment tools for mechanical computer-aided design education. Heliyon 2019; 5(10): Article number e02622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02622 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02622

Lipovtcev AY. Pedagogical statistics version 1.0.0 – a program for analysing data obtained as a result of pedagogical research using the statistical criteria of Cramer-Welch, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney, Chi-square and Fisher. Moscow: Nauka, 2004.

Downloads

Published

2020-09-14

How to Cite

Sagimbaeva, A. Y., Avdarsol, S., Zaslavskaya, O. Y., Arynova, G. S., & Baimakhanova, A. S. (2020). The Model of a System for Criteria-Based Assessing of Students’ Functional Literacy and its Developmental Impact. Journal of Intellectual Disability - Diagnosis and Treatment, 8(3), 351–357. https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2020.08.03.11

Issue

Section

Thematic Issue - Special Education Paradigm in Contemporary Vital Environment at Educational Institutions