Camel Milk and the Prevention of Glucose Cataract, an Organ Culture Study

Authors

  • Ali H.S. Alghamdi Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Al Baha University, Saudi Arabia
  • Hasabelrasoul Mohamed Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Al Baha University, Saudi Arabia
  • Hasabelrasoul Mohamed Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Al Baha University
  • Jonathan Austin Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Louisville, United States of America
  • Collin Henry Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Louisville, United States of America
  • Kayla Massey Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Louisville, United States of America
  • Shanzeh Sayied Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Louisville, United States of America
  • Samiyyah Sledge Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Louisville, United States of America
  • Aliza Williams Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Louisville, United States of America

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-5634.2018.07.02.1

Keywords:

Camel milk, Cataract, Glucose, Human, Lens, Organ culture.

Abstract

Purpose: To test if camel milk affects glucose-induced opacity in organ cultured rat and human lenses.

Methods: Whole human and rat lenses were cultured in various media containing either 55 mM glucose, camel milk, or a combination of both glucose and milk. Some lenses were cultured in a media containing neither moiety to establish a control. Absorbance spectra of human and rat lenses were measured daily using a visible/ultraviolet light spectrometer. Lens opacities were graded by a blinded grader from photographs taken daily. Aldose reductase activity, catalase activity, glutathione and receptor for advanced glycation end products levels were assayed.

Results: The optical density and light scattering intensity of human lenses cultured with glucose were higher after two to four days in organ culture compared with lenses cultured without glucose. Camel milk in the culture media attenuated the glucose-induced increase in optical density, light scattering intensity and opacity grade after two to four days for both human and rat lenses. Aldose reductase activity, catalase activity and glutathione levels were restored but the receptor for advanced glycation end products was similar in rat lenses cultured with glucose compared with those cultured with glucose and camel milk. There were no differences between the assayed moieties in human lenses cultured with glucose or glucose plus milk. Since camel milk restored rat lens glutathione levels, it is possible that camel milk may protect the lens from oxidation and significantly reduce the glucose-induced increase in light scattering of human lenses. Structurally and physiologically, rat lenses are distinct from human lenses, therefore, the rat lens data was highly variable when compared with the human lens data, highlighting the importance of using human lenses in future studies.

Conclusions: Camel milk present in the organ culture medium inhibited the glucose-induced opacity in human lenses and restored the amount of glutathione to the same levels of lenses not cultured in glucose. The positive results of the current study leads to future studies to determine the moieties in camel milk that are responsible for cataract inhibition and in vivo studies involving camel milk.

References

Bourne RR, Stevens GA, White RA, et al. Causes of vision loss worldwide, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2013; 1: e339-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70113-X

Li L, Wan XH, Zhao GH. Meta-analysis of the risk of cataract in type 2 diabetes. BMC Ophthalmol 2014; 14: 94. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-14-94

Mohamed HE, Mousa HM, Beynen AC. Ascorbic acid concentrations in milk from Sudanese camels. J Animal Physiol Anim Nutr 2005; 89: 35-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2004.00507.x

Mehaia MA, Al-Kahnal MA. Studies on camel milk goat milk proteins: nitrogen distribution and amino acid composition. Nutr Rep Int 1989; 39: 351-357.

Farah Z, Rettenmaier R, Atkins D. Vitamin content of camel milk. Int J Vitam Nutr Res 1992; 62: 30-33.

Knosess KH. The camel as meat and milk animal. World Anim Rev 1977; 22: 39-44.

Weikel KA, Garber C, Baburins A, Taylor A. Nutritional modulation of cataract. Nutr Rev 2014; 72: 30-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/nure.12077

Zibaee S, Hosseini SMA, Yousefi M, Taghipour A, Kiani MA, Noras MR. Nutritional and Therapeutic Characteristics of Camel Milk in Children: A Systematic Review. Electron Physician 2015; 7: 1523-1528. https://doi.org/10.19082/1523

Agrawal R, Dogra R, Mohta N, Tiwari R, Singhal S, Sultania S. Beneficial effect of camel milk in diabetic nephropathy. Acta Biomed 2010; 80: 131-134.

Ehlayel MS, Hazeima KA, Al-Mesaifri F, Bener A. Camel milk: an alternative for cow’s milk allergy in children. Allergy Asthma Proc 2011; 32: 255-258. https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2011.32.3429

Conesa C, Sanchez L, Rota C, et al., Isolation of lactoferrin from milk of different species: Calorimetric and antimicrobial studies. Comp Bioch Physiol Biochem Mol Biol 2008; 150: 131-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpb.2008.02.005

Saadaoui B, Henry C, Khorchani T, Mars M, Martin P, Cebo C. Proteomics of the milk fat globule membrane from Camelus dromedarius. Proteomics 2013; 13: 1180-1184. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201200113

Yang Y, Zheng N, Wang W, et al. N-glycosylation proteomic characterization and cross-species comparison of milk fat globule membrane proteins from mammals. Proteomics 2016; 16: 2792-2800. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.201500361

Casado B, Affolter M, Kussmann M. OMICS-rooted studies of milk proteins, oligosaccharides and lipids. J Proteomics 2009; 73: 196-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2009.09.018

Spertino S, Cipriani V, De Angelis C, et al. Proteome profile and biological activity of caprine, bovine and human milk fat globules. Mol Biosyst 2012; 8: 967-974. https://doi.org/10.1039/C2MB05400K

Peterson JA, Scallan CD, Ceriani RL, Hamosh M. Structural and functional aspects of three major glycoproteins of the

human milk fat globule membrane. Adv Exp Med Biol 2001; 501: 179-187. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1371-1_23

Alghamd AHS, Mohamed H, Sledge S, Borchman D. Absorbance and Light Scattering of Lenses Organ Cultured With Glucose. Curr Eye Res In 2018; 6: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2018.1485953

Bree M, Borchman D. Optical Properties of Rat, Porcine and Human Lenses and Organ Culture. Exp Eye Res 2018; 170: 67-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2018.02.016

Truscott RJW. Age-related nuclear cataract—oxidation is the key. Exp Eye Res 2005; 80: 709-725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2004.12.007

Borchman D, Yappert MC, Afzal M. Lens lipids and maximum lifespan. Exp Eye Res 2004; 79: 761-768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2004.04.004

Huang L, Yappert MC, Miller JJ, Borchman D. Thyroxine Ameliorates Oxidative Stress by Inducing Lipid Compositional Changes in Human Lens Epithelial Cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48: 3698-3704. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.06-0908

Huang L, Yappert MC, Jumblatt M, Borchman D. Hyperoxia and Thyroxine-Treatment and the Relationships Between Reactive Oxygen Species Generation, Mitochodrial Membrane Potential and Cardiolipin in Human Lens Epithelial Cell Cultures. Curr Eye Res 2008; 33: 575-586. https://doi.org/10.1080/02713680802167554

Huang L, Tang D, Yappert MC, Borchman D. Oxidation Induced Changes in Human Lens Epithelial Cells. 2. Mitochondria and the Generation of Reactive Oxygen Species. Free Rad Biol Med 2006; 41: 926-936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2006.05.023

Huang L, Estrada R, Yappert MC, Borchman D. Oxidation Induced Changes in Human Lens Epithelial Cells. 1. Phospholipids. Free Rad Biol Med 2006; 41: 1425-1432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2006.07.022

Borchman D, Stimmelmayr R, George JC. Whales, Lifespan, Phospholipids and Cataracts. J Lipid Res 2017; 58: 2289-2298. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.M079368

Pollreisz A, Schmidt-Erfurth U. Diabetic cataract-pathogenesis, epidemiology and treatment. J Ophthalmol 2010; 2010: 608751. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/608751

Lu Q, Yang T, Zhang M, Du L, Liu L, Zhang N, Guo H, Zhang F, Hu G, Yin X. Preventative effects of ginkgo biloba extract (EGb761) on high glucose-cultured opacity of rat lens. Phytother Res 2014; 28: 767-773. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.5060

Tang D, Borchman D, Yappert MC, Vrenson GFJM. Influence of age, diabetes, and cataract on lipid-calcium and protein-calcium relationships in human lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 2059-2066. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.02-0345

Pasino M, Maraini G. Cation pump activity and membrane permeability in human senile cataractous lenses. Exp Eye Res. 1982; 34: 887-893. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4835(82)90068-9

Lucas VA, Duncan G, Davies PD. Membrane permeability characteristics of perfused human senile cataractous lenses. Exp Eye Res 1986; 42: 151-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4835(86)90039-4

Duncan G, Jacob TJ. Human cataract formation. CIBA Found Symp 1984; 106: 132-148.

Gandolfi SA, Tomba CM, Maraini G. 86-Rb Efflux in normal and cataractous human lenses. Curr Eye Res 1985; 4: 753-758. https://doi.org/10.3109/02713688509020030

Yoshida H, Murachi T, Tsukahara J. Limited proteolysis of bovine lens alpha crystallin by calpain, a Ca2 dependent cysteine proteinase, isolated from the same tissue. Biochim Biophys Acta 1984; 798: 252-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4165(84)90313-1

Ireland M, Maisel H. Evidence for a Ca activated protease specific for lens intermediate filaments. Curr Eye Res 1984; 3: 423-429. https://doi.org/10.3109/02713688408997229

Downloads

Published

2018-08-16

How to Cite

Alghamdi, A. H., Mohamed, H., Mohamed, H., Austin, J., Henry, C., Massey, K., Sayied, S., Sledge, S., & Williams, A. (2018). Camel Milk and the Prevention of Glucose Cataract, an Organ Culture Study . Journal of Nutritional Therapeutics, 7(2), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-5634.2018.07.02.1

Issue

Section

Articles