Judges and Social Networks

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/2817-2302.2024.03.04

Keywords:

Expression, rights, information, judges, self-censorship

Abstract

It is essential that the judicial function be public, discreet, and professional. Its legitimacy as a public authority is acquired through the recognition of judgments, in which there is an identification between decisions and society. But what type of communication must be made by the judiciary, and especially by judges, to provide information about their activities, and ensure that their interaction strengthens the republic, generating proximity between the sovereign and the public power.

References

Downloads

Published

2024-03-20

How to Cite

Rosales, C. M. ., & Vargas, O. R. . (2024). Judges and Social Networks. Frontiers in Law, 3, 22–27. https://doi.org/10.6000/2817-2302.2024.03.04

Issue

Section

Articles