Algorithmic Decision Making: Can Artificial Intelligence and the Metaverse Provide Technological Solutions to Modernise the United Kingdom’s Legal Services and Criminal Justice?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/2817-2302.2024.03.05Keywords:
Reg Tech, Algorithmic Decision Making, Criminal Law, Deep Learning, Machine Learning, Artificial Intelligence and Criminal JusticeAbstract
Artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) have had a profound impact on various sectors including Banking (Fin Tech), Health (HealthTech) and Charitable Fundraising (Charity Tech). The ‘natural’ ability of an AI system to independently perform and, often, outthink its human-counter parts by developing ‘intelligence’(simulating human intelligence) through its own experiences and processing deep layers of information i.e., complex representations of data, and learn has resulted in astounding improvements in the completion of tasks that are complex and technical, time-consuming.AI, with the ease of working with the most granular level of detail, can identify people and objects, recognise voices, uncover patterns and, in advance, screen for problems. Yet, RegTech (or LawTech/LegalTech) has not seen the same level of advancement. AI can provide solutions and enormous economic, political, and social benefits – in terms of public service administration. The purpose of this article is to explore advents in AI (ML and DL) and whether the criminal justice system, in the United Kingdom (UK), which is heavily overburdened, could benefit from some of the advances that have taken place in other sectors and jurisdictions, and whether automation and algorithmic decision making could be used to modernise it. This research draws on domestic and international published law, regulation, and literature, and isset out in six parts, the first partre views the position of the criminal justice system i.e., issues, part two then looks at relative technological advancements in AI, and the Metaverse. Part three explores current advents in AI relating to RegTech (LawTech/LegalTech) and how, if at all, the CJS can use this technology. Part four explores what aspects of the U.K.’s CJS would be fit for automation. Part five focuses on those matters pertaining to AI that pose problems in relation to matters in part 4 i.e., AI discrimination and bias, and explores safeguarding and mitigation including the requirement for explanation as set out in the GDPR. Part six concludes the discussion with some recommendations, as at, January 2024. It is suggested that AI and algorithmic decision making, with the correct legal framework and safeguards in place, could assist in modernising the CJS focussed legal functions, services in law firms, innovating for the next decade. This work is original and timely given the increased debate relating to how AI can assist in modernising the U.K.’s CJS, the global criminal justice challenges, solutions, and what, if any, role the Metaverse can play.
References
Arner, D. W., Barberis, J. N., and Buckley, R. P. (2016). The emergence of RegTech 2.0: From know your customer to know your data. Journal of Financial Transformation, 79 UNSW Law Research Paper No. 17–63. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3044280 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3044280
Assessments in Sentencing. See, https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/33746041. And, Kleinberg, J. (et al.). Human decisions and machine predictions. Q. J. Econ. 133, 237 (2018). See also, AI resource centre: IBM. Mitigating Human Bias in AI. 2020. See, https://www.research.ibm.com/5-in-5/ai-and-bias/. And, Bellamy, R. K. E. et al. AI Fairness 360: An extensible toolkit for detecting and mitigating algorithmic bias. IBM Journal of Research and Development, vol. 63, no. 4/5, pp. 4:1-4:15, 1 July-Sept. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1147/JRD.2019.2942287 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1147/JRD.2019.2942287
Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford: OUP.
C. Singh (et al.). (2020). Can Artificial Intelligence, RegTech and CharityTech provide Effective Solutions for Anti-money Laundering and Counter-terror Financing Initiatives in Charitable Fundraising. Journal of Money Laundering Control, Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-09-2020-0100. Also, C. Singh (et.al.). (2021). Can Machine Learning, as a RegTech Compliance Tool, lighten the Regulatory Burden for Charitable Organisations in the United Kingdom? Journal of Financial Crime, Emerald. Also, C. Singh. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning: Considerations for Financial Institutions for Compliance with the Regulatory Burden in the United Kingdom.Forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-09-2020-0100
COVID-19: Update on the HMCTS response for criminal courts in England& Wales. September 2020. UK: HMSO. See, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/915493/HMCTS401_recovery_overview_for_crime_WEB.pdf. At pp.3 – 4.
Danks, D. and London, A. J. (2017). Algorithmic Bias in Autonomous Systems. In Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2017). See, https://www.cmu.edu/dietrich/philosophy/docs/london/IJCAI17-AlgorithmicBias-Distrib.pdf. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2017/654 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2017/654
Deloitte Insight Report. Developing Legal Talent: Stepping into the Future Law Firm. February 2016. And, Deloitte. (2017). Objections Overruled: The Case for Disruptive Technology in the Legal Profession. See, https://www2.deloitte.com/uk/en/pages/financial-advisory/articles/the-case-for-disruptive-technology-in-the-legal-profession.html.
Department for Digital, Culture, Media, and Sport. Data: A New Direction. 10 September 2021. UK: HMSO. See, pp.26, 37 – 41.
Department for Digital, Culture, Media, and Sport. National AI Strategy. September 2021. UK: HMSO. See, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1020402/National_AI_Strategy_-_PDF_version.pdf. Also, Department for Digital, Culture, Media, and Sport. Establishing a pro-innovation approach to regulating AI An overview of the UK’s emerging approach. 18 July 2022. UK: HMSO.
Dubber, M., Pasquale, F. and Das, S. (Eds.). (2020). The Oxford Handbook of AI. UK: OUP. At p.100. See also, Burgess, M. UK Police are Using AI to Inform Custodial Decisions. But it Could be Discriminating Against the Poor. Wired. 1 March 2018. Recent EU case where an AI algorithm was held to have been discriminatory: Filcam VGIL Bologna and others v Deliveroo Italia SRL N. R.G. 2949/2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190067397.001.0001
Edwards, L. and Veale, M. (2018). Enslaving the Algorithm: From a ’Right to an Explanation’ to a ’Right to Better Decisions’? IEEE Security and Privacy Magazine, 16 (3), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2018.2701152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2018.2701152
Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., Courville, A. and Bach, F. (2017). Deep Learning (Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning Series). USA: MIT Press.
Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., Courville, A. and Bach, F. (2017). Deep Learning (Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning Series). USA: MIT Press.
Greenstein, S. (2022). Preserving the rule of law in the era of artificial intelligence (AI). USA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-021-09294-4
Hackl et al., note [14] in: Stackpole, T. Exploring the Metaverse. HBR, July – August 2022. See, https://hbr.org/2022/07/exploring-the-metaverse.
Hackl, C. et al. (2022). Navigating the Metaverse: A Guide to Limitless Possibilities in a Web 3.0 World. USA: Wiley. Also, QuHarrison, T. et al. (2022). The Metaverse Handbook: Innovating for the Internet's Next Tectonic Shift. USA: Wiley.
HM Courts and Tribunals Service (MHCTS) Annual Report and Accounts 2021 to 2022. 19 July 2022. UK: HMSO. See, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1092139/HM_Courts___Trinbunals_Service_Annual_Report_and_Accounts_2021-22_WEB.pdf.
HMCTS opened 72 such Court rooms in July 2020 – July 2021. See, National Audit Office. Reducing the Backlog in Criminal Courts. October 2021. UK: Institute for Government. See, https://www.nao.org.uk/reports/reducing-the-backlog-in-criminal-courts/ At p.32 – 34.
HMCTS. Fit for the future: transforming the Court and Tribunal Estate. Consultation, January 2018. UK: HMSO. See, https://consult.justice.gov.uk/digital-communications/transforming-court-tribunal-estate/supporting_documents/hmctsstrategyapproachconsultation.pdf. See also, HMCTS. Government announces changes to court estate. Press Release, 24 July 2018. See, https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-announces-changes-to-court-estate.
How artificial intelligence is changing the legal tech game. February 2023. USA: Thompson Reuters Legal. See, https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/en/insights/articles/how-ai-and-document-intelligence-are-changing-the-legal-tech-game.
INTERPOL launches first global police Metaverse. 20 October 2022. See, https://www.interpol.int/en/News-and-Events/News/2022/INTERPOL-launches-first-global-police-Metaverse. Also, INTERPOL Technology Assessment: Report on Metaverse. October 2022. See, https://www.interpol.int/content/download/18440/file/INTERPOL%20Tech%20Assessment-%20Metaverse.pdf.
Kehl, D. L. and Kessler, S. A. (2017). Algorithms in the Criminal Justice System: Assessing the Use of Risk
Li, J. Deep Learning Acoustic Model in Microsoft Cortana Voice Assistant. AI & Research, November 2017. USA: Microsoft.
On AI and reflective practice see, Yu-Cheng, L. (2022). Making the world observable and accountable: An ethnomethodological inquiry into the distinction between illustration and exhaustion. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 9, 296 (2022); and Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and time. Vol 1 (trans: Beardsworth, R. and Collins, G.). USA: Stanford University Press. On reflexivity see, Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential Learning. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; and Boone, E. (1985). Developing Programs in Adult Education. USA: Waveland Press. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01314-1
On the rule of law see, Greenstein, S. Preserving the rule of law in the era of artificial intelligence(AI). Artificial Intelligence and Law (2022) 30:291–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-021-09294-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-021-09294-4
Pivot Table for the Number of Receipts, Disposals and Cases Outstanding for Cases in the Magistrates' Courts in England and Wales: April – June 2022. Criminal Court Statistics Quarterly. 29 September 2022. UK: HMSO. See, https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/criminal-court-statistics.
Pivot table for the number of receipts, disposals and cases outstanding for trial cases in the Crown Court in England and Wales: April – June 2022. Criminal Court Statistics Quarterly. 29 September 2022. UK: HMSO. See, https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/criminal-court-statistics.
Remus, D. and Levy, F. (2015). Can Robots Be Lawyers? Computers, Lawyers, and the Practice of Law. SSRN Electronic Journal. Also, Weiss, D. C. JPMorgan Chase uses tech to save 360,000 hours of annual work by lawyers and loan officers. 2 March 2017. And, Wood, J. This AI outperformed 20 corporate lawyers at legal work. World Economic Forum 2020. See, https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/11/this-ai-outperformed-20-corporate-lawyers-at-legal-work/. Also, Alarie, B., Niblett, A. and Yoon, A. H. (2018). How Artificial Intelligence Will Affect the Practice of Law. University of Toronto Law Journal, 68: 106–124.
Revell, T. AI will be able to beat us at everything by 2060. The New Scientist, 31 May 2017. See, https://www.newscientist.com/article/2133188-ai-will-be-able-to-beat-us-at-everything-by-2060-say-experts/ See also: Carrigan, M. and Porpora, D. (Eds.). (2023). Post-Human Futures: Human Enhancement, Artificial Intelligence and Social Theory (The Future of the Human). UK: Routledge.
Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S. and Guestrin, C. (2016). Why Should I Trust You?: Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 1135–1144). ACM. In Rodrigues, R. Legal and human rights issues of AI: Gaps, challenges and vulnerabilities. Journal of Responsible Technology 4 (2020) 100005. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939778 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939778
See, Recital 30 on online identifiers, and s.3 of the European Withdraw Act 2018 (UK). On reasons for control see these examples; Facebook agrees to pay UK fine over Cambridge Analytica scandal. Reuters, 30 October 2019; Investigation into the use of data analytics in political campaigns: A report to Parliament. Information Commissioners Office, 6 November 2018. UK: HMSO.
Singh, C., et al. (2022). RegTech Compliance Tools for Charities in the United Kingdom: Can Machine Learning help lighten the Regulatory Burden? The Company Lawyer, Sweet and Maxwell. Also, Singh, C., et.al. (2021). Can Machine Learning, as a RegTech Compliance Tool, lighten the Regulatory Burden for Charitable Organisations in the United Kingdom? Journal of Financial Crime, Emerald. And, Singh, C. et al. (2020). Can Artificial Intelligence, RegTech and CharityTech provide Effective Solutions for Anti-money Laundering and Counter-terror Financing Initiatives in Charitable Fundraising. Journal of Money Laundering Control, Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-09-2020-0100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-09-2020-0100
State v. Loomis: Wisconsin Supreme Court Requires Warning Before Use of Algorithmic Risk Assessments in Sentencing. Recent Case: 881 N.W.2d 749 (Wis. 2016). 130 Harv. L. Rev. 1530. For an opposing view see, State of Kansas v. John Keith Walls116,027. The CA of the State of Kansas (2017); the court held the appellant must be allowed to view the inventory assessment that the court used in imposing conditions on probation so that the accuracy could be assessed and, where found wanting, challenged. Thus, Walls’s constitutional right to procedural due process had been infringed. Also, Desai, D. R.and Kroll, J. A. (2017). Trust but Verify: A Guide to Algorithms and the Law. Harv. JL & Tech, 3, 1.
Sturge, G. Court Statistics England and Wales. House of Commons Library, Research Briefing. January 2023. UK: HMSO. See, https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/CBP-8372/CBP-8372.pdf.
The Committee of Experts on Internet Intermediaries (MSI-NET): Study on the Human Rights Dimensions of Automated Data Processing Techniques (in Particular Algorithms) and Possible Regulatory Implications. 6 October 2017. InZavršnik. A. Criminal Justice, Artificial Intelligence Systems, and Human Rights. ERA Forum (2020) 20: 567 – 583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-020-00602-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-020-00602-0
The Emergency Medical Services in Copenhagen, in collaboration with Microsoft and Corti, are using AI to detect cardiac arrests during emergency telephone calls; a virtual assistant is being used for a more effective diagnosis. Capital Region of Denmark: Using AI to improve patient care on the national healthcare system. Microsoft, 23 August 2021. See, https://customers.microsoft.com/en-us/story/1399290856490209110-region-hovedstaden-health-provider-azure-en-we
The FCA has been working on Digital Regulatory Reporting initiative since 2017 – this focuses on automating and streamlining parts of the regulatory reporting process, named ‘creating machine readable regulation (MRR) and machine executable regulation (MER).’ The aim is to reduce the regulatory reporting burden which costs the finance industry between £1.5 – 4B annually and generates a submission of 500k+ regulatory reports to the FCA each year. Automation has become a fundamental cornerstone of the regulator’s policy given regulatory reporting is a core aspect of the supervisory process, management of risk and compliance. See, https://www.fca.org.uk/innovation/regtech/digital-regulatory-reporting and, https://www.fca.org.uk/publications/business-plans/2022-23 (Business Plan 2022). Also, on how AI can help with the 134 Sustainable Development Goals see, R. Vinuesa. (et al.). The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Communications 11(1), 2020, at pp. 1 – 10.See also, C. Singh. (2023). The European Approach to Cybersecurity in 2023: A Review of the Changes Brought in By the Network and Information Security 2 (NIS2) Directive 2022/2555. Forthcoming.
The Law Society Research Report found a “diverse but fragmented ecosystem” of start-ups with most small firms shunning disruptive technology. But law fraternity had recognised the growth and importance of RegTech (or LawTech).Lawtech Adoption Research. The Law Society, February 2019. See, https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/topics/research/lawtech-adoption-report/.Also, N. Easen. The Legal Sector Faces up to its Digital Future. The Times, 6 December 2021. See, https://www.thetimes.co.uk/static/digital-data-tech-legal-sector-law-firms-automation-ai/.
There are mixed reviews on remote working and productivity in law firms; Rosner, T. The Efficacy of Law Firm Remote Working is Short Term - Here's Why. 27 August 2021. See, https://www.law.com/international-edition/2021/08/27/the-efficacy-of-law-firm-remote-working-is-short-term-heres-why/?slreturn=20230106053941. Also, Salvatore, C. and Madsen, M. R. (2019). The Legal Profession in the Era of Digital Capitalism: Disruption or New Dawn? Laws 8: 1 – 17.
Vos, G. The Future for Dispute Resolution: Horizon Scanning. The Society of Computers and Law. Sir Brian Neill Lecture 2022. UK Judiciary, 17 March 2022. UK: HMSO. See, https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/MR-to-SCL-Sir-Brain-Neill-Lecture-2022-The-Future-for-Dispute-Resolution-Horizon-Scannings-.pdf.Also, for an EU perspective see, Artificial Intelligence: Supporting Cross-Border Cooperation in Criminal Justice. Joint Report Prepared by eu-LISA and EUROJUST. June 2022.
Wachter, S. and Mittelstadt, B. D. (2019). A Right to Reasonable Inferences: Re-thinking Data Protection Law in the Age of Big Data and AI. Columbia Business Law Review, 2019, 2. https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/mu2kf DOI: https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/mu2kf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
