QAnon: A False Prophets Conspiracy

Vladislav  Solc

doi:10.6000/2817-2310.2024.03.10

Authors

Vladislav Solc Diplomate Jungian Analyst, C. G. Jung Institute of Chicago, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/2817-2310.2024.03.10

Keywords:

Theocalypse, Conspiracy Theories, Dark Religion, QAnon, Jungian Psychology.

Abstract

Examining the QAnon movement through a Jungian lens, this analysis draws parallels between archetypal defense mechanisms and the Homeric myth of Odysseus, specifically his stay on Ogygia Island. The paper introduces terms like "Dark Religion" and "theocalypse," exploring the phenomenon of mind possession in religious fundamentalism and conspiracy theories. Symbolically, Calypso, as "the concealer," functions as an archetypal protective system, diverting ego-consciousness from reality and constructing a false belief system. "Theocalypse" describes religious inflation by unconscious contents, resulting in specific mytho-poetic ideologies and archetypal images whose function is to protect ego from experiencing painful emotions.

The manifestation of Dark Religion is evident in QAnon Conspiracy Theory followers who believe in a secret war led by Donald Trump against a satanic child-trafficking cabal. This dark belief system is characterized by traits such as seeking secret signs and clues, absolutism, rejection of modernity, reactivity, aggression, a paranoid worldview, and the assertion of a special ability to see with their hearts—reading between the lines, to name a few.

Commonalities between conspiratorial and fundamentalist thinking emerge from the dynamics of inferior consciousness and subsequent ego inflation, explaining both the archetypal nature of conspiracism and its resistance to rational correction. Conspiratorialists assert additional qualities, such as being chosen to perceive the truth, promoting a superior truth without relative values or "gray" areas (superiority). Their knowledge is held unwaveringly and treated as infallible faith, often invoking sources like idols and refusing to question their authority. Vehement rejection of opposing theories (defensive selectivity) characterizes their mindset, along with a surrender of will to their leaders (submission to authority). Conspiracists actively pursue the goal of converting others (reactivity) and accept responsibility for the state of affairs only in a fantasy world, avoiding self-reflection (projection).

Conscious thinking remains free from unconscious influence only when recognizing numinous contents and withdrawing projections from objects. A symbolic perspective, treating conspiracy theories as symbols rather than rational constructs, provides a non-dismissive understanding of strong adherence to such beliefs. Examining QAnon symbolically through the lens of Jungian psychology, while understanding how adherents enact unconscious complexes and cultural complexes, offers more effective ways of understanding their beliefs than what traditional schools provide.

Breaking away from restrictive beliefs requires embracing living symbols tethered to reality, facilitating genuine feeling-insight, authentic suffering, and thereby fostering a connection with one's psyche.

References

Almond GA, Appleby RS, Sivan E. (2003). Strong Religion. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226014999.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226014999.001.0001

Awford J. (2017, December 26). Conspiracy Theorists Convinced Earth Is Hollow and Filled with Aliens. New York Post.

Baigent M, Leigh R, Lincoln H. (1986). The Messianic Legacy. New York: Henry Holt & Co.

Barkun M. (2003). A Culture of Conspiracy. Berkeley: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520238053.003.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520238053.003.0001

Bedantam S. (2014, June 4). More Americans Than You Might Think Believe In Conspiracy Theories. Morning Edition.

Brotherton R. (2013). Suspicious Minds. Why We Believe Conspiracy Theories. New York: Bloomsbury Sigma.

Butcher SH. (1909). The Odyssey of Homer: Books I-XII. Macmillan.

Cohen, R. (2010, December 20). The Captive Arab Mind. The New York Times.

Corbett L. (2018). Understanding Evil: A Psychotherapist's Guide. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351199674 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351199674

Desmet C. (2022). Nietzsche's Symbolic Politics. Edinburgh University Press.

Eliade M. (1972). Shamanism: Archaic Techniques of Ecstasy. Princeton University Press.

Franks B, Bangerter A, Bauer MW. (2013, July 16). Conspiracy Theories as Quasi-Religious Mentality: An Integrated Account from Cognitive Science, Social Representations Theory, and Frame Theory. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00424 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00424

Gavin S. (2021). Trauma and Conspiracy Theories: Unraveling the Psyche's Secrets. University of Maryland Research.

Gavin S. (2021). University of Maryland Research.

Homer. (1871). The Odyssey of Homer. George Bell and Sons.

Imhoff R. (2018, April 17). Conspiracy Theorists Just Want to Feel Special. Vice.

Jolley D, Meleady R, Douglas KM. (2019, March). Exposure to Intergroup Conspiracy Theories Promotes Prejudice Which Spreads across Groups. British Journal of Psychology, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12385 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12385

Jung CG. (1921/1971). Psychological Types (Collected Works Vol. 6). Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Jung CG. (1954/1968). Man and His Symbols. Dell Publishing.

Jung CG. (1969). Aion. CW 9ii.

Kalsched D. (2023). The Archetype of Innocence in Dissociative Defense. In L. Sawin & J. Cambray (Eds., upcoming), A World of Uncertainty: Challenges and Opportunities during Difficult Times (p.22). Chiron Publications.

Kalsched D. 1996, The Inner World of Trauma: Archetypal Defenses of the Personal Spirit, New York, Routledge Kalsched, D., 2013, Trauma and the Soul: A Psycho-Spiritual Approach to Human Development and its Interruption, New York, Routledge Levine, P., (2015) Trauma and Memory: Brain and Body in Search for the Living Past, Berkeley California, North Atlantic Books.

Matthew. (7:15). The Holy Bible (King James Version).

Melley T. (2000). Empire of Conspiracy: The Culture of Paranoia in Postwar America. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Moscovici S. (1987). The Conspiracy Mentality. In C. F. Graumann & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Changing Conceptions of Conspiracy (pp. 151–169). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4618-3_9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4618-3_9

Neumann E. (1969). Depth Psychology and a New Ethic. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.

Oliver JE, Wood TJ. (2014). Conspiracy Theories and the Paranoid Style(s) of Mass Opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 952–966. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12084

Online Etymology Dictionary. (2001-2011). Calypso. Retrieved from http://www.etymonline.com

Part IV. Psychological News. (1871). The Journal of Mental Science, 16. London: Longman, Green, Longman & Roberts.

Radnitz S, Underwood PK. (2017). Is Belief in Conspiracy Theories Pathological? A Survey Experiment on the Cognitive Roots of Extreme Suspicion. British Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123414000556 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123414000556

Šolc V, Didier GJ. (2018). Dark Religion: Fundamentalism from the Perspective of Jungian Psychology. Ashville, NC: Chiron Publications.

Šolc V. (2016). Kde se rodí konspirační teorie. Vesmír.

Time. (2019). The Reptilian Elite. In Conspiracy Theories: Separating Fact From Fiction.

Uscinski JE, Parent JM. (2014). American Conspiracy Theories. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199351800.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199351800.001.0001

Vojtíšek Z. (2016). Konspirace. Dingir, 2.

Walker J. (2013). A United States of Paranoia: A Conspiracy Theory. New York: HarperCollins.