Urban Planning Across Europe: Insights into Planning Cultures of Switzerland, Greece, and Serbia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/2817-2310.2024.03.12Keywords:
Urban planning, planning cultures, cultural embeddedness, multiple case study, Solothurn, Patras, BelgradeAbstract
The research explores the planning cultures in three distinct European contexts: Solothurn (Switzerland), Patras (Greece), and Belgrade (Serbia). Grounded in the conceptual framework of planning culture, which posits that spatial planning practices are deeply influenced by societal, institutional, and professional contexts, the analysis examines three key dimensions: social setting, planning process, and planning environment. The multiple case study methodological approach employed in this research illuminates both the diversity and commonalities in planning cultures, highlighting the importance of cultivating context-sensitive planning practices. The Solothurn case exemplifies a decentralised, consensus-based planning culture rooted in Swiss direct democracy, where collaborative processes and independent expertise are pivotal in shaping innovative spatial solutions. In contrast, the Patras and Belgrade cases reveal the challenges of centralised decision-making, administrative fragmentation, and the marginalisation of planning professionals and public participation in Greece and Serbia, respectively. On the one hand, these findings underscore the profound influence of political, economic, and cultural factors on the conceptualisation, implementation, and experience of spatial planning across diverse European contexts. On the other hand, the analysis suggests that effective spatial planning must be tailored to local cultural environments rather than applying universal models. The research ultimately contributes to the broader discourse on the cultural embeddedness of planning and offers insights for practitioners, policymakers, and scholars seeking to develop more nuanced, adaptive approaches to addressing contemporary urban challenges.
References
Blagojević, Mina and Ana Perić. 2023.“The diffusion of participatory planning ideas and practices: the case of socialist Yugoslavia, 1961-1982.” Journal of Urban History 49(4): 797-820. https://doi.org/10.1177/00961442211044501 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00961442211044501
CEC (Commission of the European Communities). 1997. The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
CEC (Commission of the European Communities). 1999. The European Spatial Development Perspective: Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
COMMIN. 2009. Comparison of Planning Systems. Available online at www.commin.org (accessed 1 May 2022).
Dühr, Stefanie, Dominic Stead and Will Zonneveld. 2007. “The Europeanization of spatial planning through territorial cooperation.” Planning Practice & Research 22(3): 291-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450701688245 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450701688245
Dühr, Stefanie, Vincent Nadin and Claire Colomb. 2010. European spatial planning and territorial cooperation. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203895290 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203895290
Dühr, Stefanie, Richard Cowell and Eric Markus. 2016. “Europeanizing planning education and the enduring power of national institutions.” International Planning Studies 21(1): 16-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2015.1114447 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2015.1114447
During, Roel and Rosalie van Dam. 2007. Cultural Differences in European Cooperation: Learning from INTERREG Practice. Final report of the INTERACT project CULTPLAN. Wagenin-gen: Alterra, Wageningen University and Research Centre.
Ernste, Huib. 2012. “Framing Cultures of Spatial Planning.” Planning Practice and Research 27(1): 87-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.661194 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.661194
EU (Informal meeting of Ministers responsible forurban development and territorial cohesion). 2007. Territorial Agenda: Towards a More Competitive and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions.Germany, 24-25 May 2007.
EU (Informal meeting of Ministers responsible for urban development and territorial cohesion). 2011. Territorial Agenda2020: Towards an Inclusive, Smart and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions. Hungary, 19 May 2011.
EU (Informal meeting of Ministers responsible for spatial planning, territorial development and/or territorial cohesion). 2020. Territorial Agenda 2030: A Future for All Places. Germany, 1 December 2020.
Faludi, Andreas. 2005. “The Netherlands: a culture with a soft spot for planning.” Pp. 285-308 in Comparative Planning Cultures, edited by B. Sanyal. New York: Routledge.
Faludi, Andreas. 2014. “EUropeanisation or Europeanisation of spatial planning?” Planning Theory & Practice 15(2): 155-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2014.902095 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2014.902095
Farinós Dasi, Joaquin, ed. 2006. Governance of Territorial and Urban Policies from EU to Local Level. Final Report of ESPON Project 2.3.2. Esch-surAlzette: ESPON Coordination Unit.
Friedmann, John. 2005. “Planning cultures in transition.” Pp. 29-44 in Comparative Planning Cultures, edited by B. Sanyal. New York: Routledge.
Fürst, Dietrich. 2009. “Planning cultures en route to a better comprehension of ‘planning processes’?” Pp. 23-38 in Planning Cultures in Europe: Decoding Cultural Phenomena in Urban and Regional Planning, edited by J. Knieling and F. Othengrafen. Farnham: Ashgate.
Giannakourou, Georgia. 2011. “Europeanization, Actor constellations and Spatial Policy in Greece.” disP – The Planning Review 47: 32-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2011.10557142 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2011.10557142
Getimis, Panagiotis. 2012. “Comparing Spatial Planning Systems and Planning Cultures in Europe.” Planning Practice and Research 27(1): 25-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.659520 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.659520
Grams, Anita. 2011. [Personal communication]. 4 September.
Gullestrup, Hans. 2009. “Theoretical reflections on common European (planning) cultures.” Pp. 3-22 in Planning Cultures in Europe: Decoding Cultural Phenomena in Urban and Regional Planning, edited by J. Knieling and F. Othengrafen. Farnham: Ashgate.
Healey, Patsy. 2006. “Relational Complexity and the Imaginative Power of Strategic Spatial Planning.” European Planning Studies 14(4): 525-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310500421196 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310500421196
Healey, Patsy. 2011. “The universal and the contingent: Some reflections on the transnational flow of planning ideas and practices.” Planning Theory 11: 188-207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095211419333 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095211419333
Keller, Donald. A., Michael Koch and Klaus Selle. 1996. “‘Either/or’ and ‘and’: first impressions of a journey into the planning cultures of four countries.” Planning Perspectives 11(1): 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/026654396364925 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/026654396364925
Knieling, Jörg and Frank Othengrafen, eds. 2009a. Planning Cultures in Europe: Decoding Cultural Phenomena in Urban and Regional Planning. Farnham: Ashgate.
Knieling, Jörg and Frank Othengrafen. 2009b. “En route to a theoretical model for comparative research on planning cultures.” Pp. 39-62 in Planning Cultures in Europe: Decoding Cultural Phenomena in Urban and Regional Planning, edited by J. Knieling and F. Othengrafen. Farnham: Ashgate.
Knieling, Jörg and Frank Othengrafen, eds. 2016. Cities in Crisis: Socio-spatial impacts of the economic crisis in Southern European cities. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315725048 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315725048
Maruna, Marija. 2015. “Can Planning Solutions Be Evaluated without Insight into the Process of their Creation?” Pp. 121-32 in Proceedings of the REAL CORP 2015 Conference “Plan Together–Right Now–Overall, edited by M. Schrenk, V. Popovich, P. Zeile, P. Elisei and C. Beyer. Vienna: REAL CORP.
Nadin, Vincent, Giancarlo Cotella and Peter Schmitt, eds. 2024. Spatial Planning Systems in Europe: Comparison and Trajectories. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839106255 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839106255
Newman, Peter and Andy Thornley. 1996. Urban Planning in Europe: International Competition, National Systems, and Planning Projects. London: Routledge.
OG RS 3/2013. Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia 3/2013. Law Ratifying the Agreement on Cooperation between the Government of the Republic of Serbia and the Government of the United Arab Emirates.
OG RS 34/2015. Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia 34/2015. Lex Specialis – Law Establishing Public Interest and Special Expropriation and Construction Permitting Procedures for the Belgrade Waterfront Project.
Othengrafen, Frank. 2010. “Spatial planning as expression of culturised planning practices: the examples of Helsinki, Finland and Athens, Greece.” Town Planning Review 81(1): 83-110. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2009.25 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2009.25
Othengrafen, Frank. 2012. Uncovering the Unconscious Dimensions of Planning. Using Culture as a Tool to Analyse Spatial Planning Practices. Farnham: Ashgate.
Othengrafen, Frank and Mario Reimer. 2013. “The embeddedness of planning in cultural contexts: theoretical foundations for the analysis of dynamic planning cultures.” Environment and Planning A 45: 1269-84. https://doi.org/10.1068/a45131 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a45131
Papaioannou, Athanasios and Christina Nikolakopoulou. 2016. “Greek cities in crisis: Context, evidence, response.” Pp. 172-89 in Cities in Crisis: Socio-spatial impacts of the economic crisis in Southern European cities, edited by J. Knieling and F. Othengrafen. New York: Routledge.
Papamichail, Theodora. 2015. “Railway and urban development in Patras: Towards the improved participation of local governance in complex planning problems.” Serbian Architectural Journal 7(3): 365-80. https://doi.org/10.5937/SAJ1503365P DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/SAJ1503365P
Papamichail, Theodora. 2019. “Spatial Synergies. Synergies between formal and informal planning as a key concept towards spatial conflicts – the case of tourism-oriented railway development in the Peloponnese.” PhD dissertation, Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich.
Papamichail, Theodora and Ana Perić. 2018.“Informal democracy in Patras, Greece: A mechanism for improved planning?” Cities 74: 334-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.12.023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.12.023
Papamichail, Theodora and Ana Perić. 2023. “Action-oriented planning methods as a tool for improving regional governance in Switzerland: evidence from the Sisslerfeld area.” Land Use Policy 134: 106927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106927 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106927
Pappas, Vassilis, Io Kalamiotis and Io Karidi, eds. 2013. CODE PATRAS Joint Seminar Week, Urban and Railway Development in Patras: Report. Patras: University of Patras.
Perić, Ana. 2016. “Efforts against Trenophobia in the Greek Capital.” Pp. 89-107 in CODE: ATHENS! Railway and City Development in Athens, edited by B. Scholl, K. Moraitis, V. Pappas, A. Perić and I. Frezadou. Zurich: ETH Zurich, Institute for Spatial and Landscape Development.
Perić, Ana. 2020. “Public engagement under authoritarian entrepreneurialism: the Belgrade Waterfront project.” Urban Research and Practice 13(2): 213-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2019.1670469 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2019.1670469
Perić, Ana and Frank D’hondt. 2022. “Squandering the territorial capital in the Balkans? Urban megaprojects between global trends and local incentives.” Urban Design International 27(4): 288-306. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-020-00146-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-020-00146-2
Perić, Ana and Marija Maruna. 2022. “Post-socialist discourse of urban megaproject development: from City on the Water to Belgrade Waterfront.” Cities 130: 103876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103876 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103876
Perić, Ana, Sophie Hauller and David Kaufmann. 2023. “Cooperative planning under pro-development urban agenda? A collage of densification practices in Zurich, Switzerland.” Habitat International 140: 102922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102922 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102922
Purkarthofer, Eva, Alois Humer and Hanna Mattila. 2021. “Subnational and Dynamic Conceptualisations of Planning Culture: The Culture of Regional Planning and Regional Planning Cultures in Finland.” Planning Theory & Practice 22(2): 244-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2021.1896772 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2021.1896772
Reimer, Mario. 2013. “Planning Cultures in Transition: Sustainability Management and Institutional Change in Spatial Planning.” Sustainability 5: 4653-73. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5114653 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su5114653
Reimer, Mario and Hans H. Blotevogel. 2012. “Comparing Spatial Planning Practice in Europe: A Plea for Cultural Sensitization.” Planning Practice and Research 27(1): 7-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.659517 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2012.659517
Reimer, Mario, Panagiotis Getimis and Hans H. Blotevogel, eds. 2014. Spatial planning systems and practices in Europe: a comparative perspective on continuity and changes. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315852577 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315852577
RPG SR700. Federal Act on Spatial Planning and Ordinance (Raumplanungsgesetz, Bundesgesetzvom 22. Juni 1979 über die Raumplanung).
Sanyal, Bish, ed. 2005. Comparative Planning Cultures. New York: Routledge.
Scholl, Bernd, ed. 2008. Spatial planning and development in Switzerland – observations and suggestions from the international group of experts. Zurich: ETH Zurich, Institute for Spatial and Landscape Development.
Scholl, Bernd, Bernard Staub and Martin Vinzens, eds. 2013. Test Planning – A Method with a Future. Main features and information on the practical application of the test planning process using Riedholz/Luterbach as an example. Zurich: vdf Verlag.
Scholl, Bernd. 2017. “Building Actor Relationships and Alliances for Complex Problem Solving in Spatial Planning: The Test Planning Method.” disP – The Planning Review 53(1): 46-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2017.1316544 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2017.1316544
Staub, Bernard. 2011. [Personal communication]. 3 December.
Swiss Federal Council. 2012. Sustainable Development Strategy 2012-2015. Bernе: Swiss Federal Council.
Vujošević, Miodrag. 2010. “Collapse of strategic thinking, research and governance in Serbia and possible role of the spatial plan of the Republic of Serbia (2010) and its renewal.” SPATIUM International Review 23: 22-29. https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT1023022V DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/SPAT1023022V
Vujošević, Miodrag, Slavka Zeković and Tamara Maričić. 2012. “Post-socialist transition in Serbia and its unsustainable path.” European Planning Studies 20: 1707-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.713330 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.713330
Zeković, Slavka and Tamara Maričić. 2022. “Contemporary governance of urban mega-projects: a case study of the Belgrade Waterfront.” Territory, Politics, Governance 10(4): 527-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1774410 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2020.1774410
Zeković, Slavka, Ana Perić and Miroljub Hadžić. 2023. “The financialization of ‘the urban’ in the post-socialist Serbia: evidence from the Belgrade Waterfront megaproject.” Journal of Urban Affairs (online first) https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2023.2239962 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2023.2239962
Zeković, Slavka, Miodrag Vujošević and Tamara Maričić. 2015. “Spatial regularization, planning instruments and urban land market in a post-socialist society: The case of Belgrade.” Habitat International 48: 65-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.03.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.03.010
Zifou, Maria. 2015. “Greek Spatial Planning and the Crisis.” Pp. 155-78in City of Crisis: The Multiple Contestation of Southern European Cities, edited by F. Eckardt and J. R. Sanchez. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839428429-009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839428429-009
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Policy for Journals with Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
