Effects of Calf Sex Altering Oral Preparation on Pregnancy Rate and Female Calf Production in the Buffalo

Kapil Dev  Yadav; Aashirbad  Pokharel; Gokarna  Gautam; Shatrughan  Shah; Mourad  Rekik; Deka Ram  Pratim; Padmakumar  Varijakshapanicker; Bhuminand  Devkota

doi:10.6000/1927-520X.2026.15.04

Authors

Kapil Dev Yadav Department of Theriogenology, Faculty of Animal Science, Veterinary Science and Fisheries, Agriculture and Forestry University, Chitwan 44209, Nepal
Aashirbad Pokharel Department of Theriogenology, Faculty of Animal Science, Veterinary Science and Fisheries, Agriculture and Forestry University, Chitwan 44209, Nepal
Gokarna Gautam Department of Theriogenology, Faculty of Animal Science, Veterinary Science and Fisheries, Agriculture and Forestry University, Chitwan 44209, Nepal
Shatrughan Shah Department of Theriogenology, Faculty of Animal Science, Veterinary Science and Fisheries, Agriculture and Forestry University, Chitwan 44209, Nepal
Mourad Rekik International Centre for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), P.O. Box 950764, Amman 11195, Jordan
Deka Ram Pratim International Livestock Research Institute, National Agricultural Science Complex, Pusa, New Delhi 110012, India
Padmakumar Varijakshapanicker Senior Research Coordinator, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Nepal
Bhuminand Devkota Department of Theriogenology, Faculty of Animal Science, Veterinary Science and Fisheries, Agriculture and Forestry University, Chitwan 44209, Nepal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2026.15.04

Keywords:

Buffalo, FemEXX®, Sex-altering oral preparation, Calf sex ratio, Pregnancy rate, Gestation period

Abstract

Purpose of the Study: The use of calf sex-altering oral preparations (CSAOP) to increase female offspring can offer advantages in field applicability and affordability compared to other sex-manipulation techniques. The current study evaluated the effect of CSAOP (FemEXX^®) on pregnancy rate and calf sex ratio in buffaloes.

Methods: Parous buffaloes (N = 240) were selected and randomly divided into four groups (60 buffaloes per group). The groups received one of the following treatments: CSAOP alone, CSAOP combined with a special feed supplement, special feed supplement alone, or no treatment (control). At estrus, all buffaloes were bred naturally, and those in the CSAOP alone and CSAOP + special feed supplement groups were orally drenched with 300 mL of FemEXX^®, 30 minutes after natural mating. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the effects of treatment and other factors on pregnancy and female calf birth rates, and linear regression was applied for gestation length. Variables significant in univariable analysis were included in multivariable models, with statistical significance set at p< 0.05.

Results: The overall pregnancy rate was 76.62%, and no significant difference in pregnancy rate was observed among treatment groups (p = 0.76). However, the proportion of female calves was significantly higher in the CSAOP (78.9%) and CSAOP with special feed (77.1%) groups than in controls (42.5%), with higher odds of female calf birth (OR = 4.64, 95% CI: 1.68-12.78 and OR = 4.22, 95% CI: 1.52-11.72, respectively). Pluriparous buffaloes had higher odds of producing female calves than primiparous animals (OR = 2.18; 95% CI: 1.01-4.70). Gestation length did not differ among treatment groups but was shorter in female-bearing buffaloes (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: In conclusion the use of CSAOP is effective in increasing the number of female calves without affecting pregnancy rate in buffaloes.

References

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT [Internet]. Rome: FAO; 2025.

Coman S, Berean DI, Cimpean R, Ciupe S, Coman I, Bogdan LM. Clinical modalities for enhancing reproductive efficiency in buffaloes: a review and practical aspects for veterinary practitioners. Animals 2024; 14(18). DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14182642

Phogat JB, Pandey AK, Singh I. Seasonality in buffalo reproduction. Vet Pract 2016; (2): 46-55.

Warriach HM, McGill DM, Bush RD, Wynn PC, Chohan KR. A review of recent developments in buffalo reproduction. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2015 Mar; 28(3): 451-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0259

Pokharel A, Gautam G, Shah S, Yadav KD, Rekik M, Pratim DR, et al. Determining the best timing of insemination based on salivary fern pattern and its association with conception in buffalo. AnimReprod Sci 2025; 280: 107968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2025.107968

Nadeem N, Javed MI, Hassan I, Khurshid W, Ali A. Total factor productivity growth and performance of livestock sector in Punjab, Pakistan. J Agric Res 2012; 50(2).

Sethi RK, Sharma A. A study of sex ratio in Murrah buffaloes. Asian J Dairy Res. 1983; 2(4): 245-7.

Biradar US, Mallikarjunappa S. Influence of season, parity and year on sex ratio in Surti buffaloes. Indian J Anim Res. 1991; 25(2): 101-2.

Tomar SS, Tripathi VN. Inheritance of sex ratio in Murrah buffaloes. Indian Vet J. 1988; 65(8): 687-92.

Ghavi HZN, Madad M, Shadparvar AA, Kianzad D. An observational analysis of secondary sex ratio, stillbirth and birth weight in Iranian buffaloes (Bubalusbubalis). J Agric Sci Technol 2012; 14: 1477-84.

Sharma RK, Jerome A, Purohit GN. Reproductive physiology of the male and female buffalo. Bubaline Theriogenology 2014; 57: 602-14.

Khan S, Qureshi MS, Sultan A. Effect of breeding method on calf sex and postpartum reproductive performance of cattle and buffaloes. Sarhad J Agric 2012; 28: 469-76.

Rorie RW. Effect of timing of artificial insemination on sex ratio. Theriogenology. 1999; 52(8): 1273-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00216-2

Ün M. The effect of pre-pregnancy feeding on the sex ratio of sheep and cattle. J Exp Basic Med Sci 2020; 1(1): 6-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5606/jebms.2020.75601

De Graaf SP, Beilby KH, Underwood SL, Evans G, Maxwell WMC. Sperm sexing in sheep and cattle: the exception and the rule. Theriogenology 2009 Jan; 71(1): 89-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.09.014

Bayrıl T. Effects of use of conventional and sexed semen on conception rate, calf sex, calf birth weight, and stillbirth in Holstein heifers. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 2023; 47: 108-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0128.4275

Reese S, Pirez MC, Steele H, Kölle S. The reproductive success of bovine sperm after sex-sorting: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2021 Aug; 11(1): 17366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96834-2

Naidu SJ, Arangasamy A, Selvaraju S, Binsila BK, Ravindra JP, Reddy IJ, et al. Spermatozoa sorting techniques for sex pre-selection: a review. Indian J Anim Res 2025; 59(1): 1-10.

Seidel GE. Sexing mammalian sperm: intertwining of commerce, technology, and biology. AnimReprod Sci 2003; 79(3-4): 145-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(03)00162-3

Aulakh BS. Sex fixing: the dawn of a new era. New Delhi: Studium Press; 2009.

Salisbury GW, Van De Mark NZ. Physiology of reproduction and artificial insemination in cattle. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1961.

Ferguson JD, Galligan DT, Thomsen N. Principal descriptors of body condition score in Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci 1994; 77(9): 2695-703. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77212-X

Aulakh BS. An exercise into sex fixing of progenies in dairy animals and calculating the impact factor of such a drug discovery with reference to Indian conditions. J Anim Res 2018; 8(3): 435-9.

Devkota B, Nakao T, Kobayashi K, Sato H, Sah SK, Singh DK, et al. Effects of treatment for anestrus in water buffaloes with PGF2α and GnRH in comparison with vitamin-mineral supplement, and some factors influencing treatment effects. J Vet Med Sci 2013; 75(12): 1623-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.12-0515

Gautam G, Adhikari S, Shah S. Efficacy of omitting initial GnRH in once-used CIDR co-synch protocol for the treatment of anestrus in buffaloes during low breeding season. Buffalo Bull 2024; 43: 255-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56825/bufbu.2024.4325363

Kandel S, Gautam G, Devkota B, Singh S. Effectiveness of once-used versus new CIDR in CIDR co-synch protocol for resuming reproductive function in anestrous buffaloes during low breeding season. Int J Vet Sci 2024; 13: 723-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.aavs/2024/12.6.994.1001

Chester-Jones H, Vermeire D, Brommelsiek W, Brokken K, Marx G, Linn JG. Effect of trace mineral source on reproduction and milk production in Holstein cows. Prof Anim Sci 2013; 29: 289-97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15232/S1080-7446(15)30235-7

Amin B, Dar R, Ali A, Malla J, Shubeena S. Role of micronutrients in bovine reproduction. Theriogenology Insight 2016; 6: 57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5958/2277-3371.2016.00008.5

Lucy MC. Mechanisms linking nutrition and reproduction in postpartum cows. Reproduction Suppl 2003; 61: 415-27.

Tanwar PS. Effect of mineral supplementation on production and reproduction performance of buffaloes under farmer management practices. Indian J Anim Res 2019; 53: 7707-9.

Perera BMAO. Reproductive cycles of buffalo. AnimReprod Sci 2011; 124(3-4): 194-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.08.022

Neglia G, Nicola D, Esposito L, Salzano A, D’Occhio M, Fatone G. Reproductive management in buffalo by artificial insemination. Theriogenology 2020; 150: 234-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2020.01.016

Sundaramurthy VS, Babu S. Evaluation of Aulprofem® technology for control of sex ratio in dairy cattle: a preliminary study. Int J Sci 2018; 7(4): 1242-50.

Aulakh BS. A brief description and impact factor calculation about a sex fixing exercise in dairy animals undertaken in India. Int J Curr Res 2018; 10(8): 72843-7.

Aulakh BS. A trial into sex fixing of progenies in dairy animals and calculating the developmental impact factor of such research in Indian context. Int J Dev Res 2018; 8(8): 22488-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30954/2277-940X.06.2018.16

Pratt NC, Huck UW, Lisk RD. Offspring sex ratio in hamsters is correlated with vaginal pH at certain times of mating. Behav Neural Biol 1987; 48(2): 310-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0163-1047(87)90864-8

James WH. Parental hormone levels and mammalian sex ratios at birth. J Theor Biol 1989; 139(1): 59-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5193(89)80057-8

James WH. Evidence that mammalian sex ratios at birth are partially controlled by parental hormone levels at the time of conception. J Theor Biol. 1996; 180(4): 271-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1996.0102

Goshu G, Singh H. Genetic and non-genetic parameters of replacement rate component traits in Holstein Friesian cattle. Springerplus 2013; 2(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-581

Berry DP, Cromie AR. Artificial insemination increases the probability of a male calf in dairy and beef cattle. Theriogenology 2007; 67(2): 346-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2006.08.003

Usmani RH, Lewis GS, Naz NA. Factors affecting length of gestation and birth weight of Nili-Ravi buffaloes. AnimReprod Sci. 1987; 14(3): 195-203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4320(87)90083-2

Purohit GN. Gestation and fetal development in the buffalo. Buffalo Bull 2014; 33(1): 1-14.

Mitchell C, Vidlund T, Craun H, Mercadante VRG, Redifer T, Currin J. A retrospective analysis of gestational length and its influencers for Bos taurus beef cows. J Anim Sci 2024; 102(Suppl 1): 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skae019.003

Setyorini YW, Kurnianto E, Sutopo, Sutiyono. Correlation between gestation period and calf sex in dairy cows. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 2023; 1246(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1246/1/012065

Hwang JM, Choi JG, Kim HC, Choy YH, Kim S, Lee C, et al. Genetic relationship of gestation length with birth and weaning weight in Hanwoo (Bos tauruscoreanae). Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2008; 21(5): 633-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2008.70509

Stenhouse C, Bazer FW, Ashworth CJ. Sexual dimorphism in placental development and function: comparative physiology with an emphasis on the pig. Mol Reprod Dev 2023; 90(7): 684-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.23573

Kumar S, Gordon GH, Abbott DH, Mishra JS. Androgens in maternal vascular and placental function: implications for preeclampsia pathogenesis. Reproduction 2018; 156(5): R155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-18-0278