Evaluation of Genetic Merit of Buffaloes by Direct Sequencing

Darshan Raj Gangaraj

doi:10.6000/1927-520X.2012.01.01.15

Authors

Darshan Raj Gangaraj Veterinary Officer, Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Services, Government of Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2012.01.01.15

Keywords:

Traits, Chromosomes, Selection, Genetic Marker, Genotype

Abstract

Sequencing the genome of the buffaloes enables scientists to more accurately identify the genetic markers that are responsible for economically important traits such as milk yield, milk fat and protein. Producers can use that information to breed healthier dairy animals that produce more and higher quality milk as well as beef animals. Consumers will benefit from more cost-effective and healthier products on store shelves. Understanding what genes contribute to specific buffalo animal traits will also have spinoff applications related to other fields like human health and disease. The animals used in the genome project have had a high impact on the breeding and commercial sectors in dairy and beef.

References

Thomas. Milking management of dairy buffaloes, Doctoral thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, 2004.

Anonymous. Board on Science and Technology for International Development (BSTID), Report of an ad hoc Panel of the Advisory Committee on Technology Innovation, Commission on International Relations 1981.

Anonymous. Manorama India Yearbook. Cinderella of Indian Agriculture. Manorama India Yearbook 1998; 533-536.

Mahadevan P. Distribution, ecology and adaptation of river buffaloes. In: Buffalo production, production-system approach. (Eds. M.H. Tulooh. J.H.G. HolmesWorld Animal Science, c6, Elsevier Scientific Publications, Amsterdam, Netherlands 1992; 1-58.

Sastry NSR. Monograph: Buffalo Husbandry; Constraints to successful buffalo farming and overcoming the same through management. Institute of Animal Management and Breeding, University of Hohenheim, Germany, Discipline - Milk Production 1983; 4-6.

Rao MK, Nagarcenkar R. Potentialities of the buffalo. W Rev Anim Prod 1977; 13: 53-2.

Walstra P, Geurts TJ, Noomen A, Jellema A, van Boekel MAJS. In: Dairy Technology, Principles of Milk Properties and Processes. Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York, 1999. Wahid A. Pakistani buffaloes. World Anim Rev 1973; 7: 22-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780824746414

Anonymous. Board on Science and Technology for International Development (BSTID), Report of an ad hoc Panel of the Advisory Committee on Technology Innovation, Commission on International Relations 1981.

Pathak NN. Behavior and training of river buffaloes. In: Buffalo production, production-system approach. Eds., Tulooh, N. M., Holmes J, H, G., World Animal Science, c6, Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands 1992; 223-231.

Sebastian L, Mudgal VD, Nair PG, Comparative efficiency of milk production by Sahiwal cattle and Murrah buffalo. J Anim Sci 1970; 30: 253-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1970.302253x

Ganguli NC. Buffalo as a candidate for milk production. Federation Internationale IFCN, International Farm Comparison Network, Report. 2003, A review of milk production in India with particular emphasis on small producers 1981.

Chantalakhana C. and Falvey L. Small Holder Dairying in the Tropics. ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute), Nairobi, Kenya 1999; 462.

Perez-Enciso M, Ferretti L. Massive parallel sequencing in animal genetics: wherefroms and Wheretos. Anim Genet 2010; 41: 561-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2010.02057.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2010.02057.x

Yahyaoui MH. Genetic polymorphism in goat, Study of the kappa casein, beta lactoglobulin, and stearoyl coenzyme A desaturase genes. Ph.D thesis submitted to Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona., Bellaterra 2003.

Jeffreys AJ, Wilson V, Thein SL, Individual-specific fingerprint of human DNA. Nature 1985; 316: 76-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/316076a0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/316076a0

Schrooten C, Bovenhuis H, Coppieters W, Van Arendonk JAM. Whole Genome Scan to Detect Quantitative Trait Loci for Conformation and Functional Traits in Dairy Cattle. J Dairy Sci 2000; 83: 795-806. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74942-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74942-3

Shuster DE, Kehrli Jr ME, Ackermann MR, Gilbert RO. Identification and prevalence of a genetic defect that causes leukocyte adhesion deficiency in Holstein cattle. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1992; 89: 9225-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.19.9225 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.19.9225

Rempel WE, Lu M, El-Kandelgy S, et al. Relative accuracy of the halothane challenge test and a molecular genetic test in detecting the gene for porcine stress syndrome. J Anim Sci 1993; 71: 1395-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/1993.7161395x

Manfredi E, Ricordeau G, Barbieri M, Amigues Y, Bibe B. Genotype caseines αs1 et selection des boucs sur descendance dans les races Alpine et Saanen. Genet Sel Evol 1995; 27: 451-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-27-5-451 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/gse:19950505

Koopaei H K. and Koshkoiyeh AE. Application of genomic technologies to the improvement of meat quality in farm animals Biotechnol Mol Bio Rev 2011; 6: 126-32.

Da Y. Statistical analysis and experimental design for mapping genes of complex traits in domestic animals. Bioinformatics 2003; 30: 1183-92.

Tabor HK, Risch NJ, Myers RM. Candidate-gene approaches for studying complex genetic traits: Practical considerations. Nat Rev Genet 2002; 3: 391-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrg796 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg796

Jiang Z, Michal JJ, Zhang M, Zambrano-Varon J, Ealy AD. Whole Genome Sequencing Of Water Buffalo - Initial Characterization For Developing Novel Assembly Strategy. Goat Genome Sequencing and Its Annotation. Plant & Animal Genomes XIX Conference, San Diego, CA 2011; January 15-19. W533 Cattle/sheep.

Van Tassell CP, Smith TPL, Matukumalli LK, et al. SNP discovery and allele frequency estimation by deep sequencing of reduced representation libraries. Nat Methods 2008; 5: 247-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1185

VanRaden P, Connell JRO, Wiggans GR, Weigel KA. Genomic evaluations with many more genotypes. Genet Sel Evol 2011; 43: 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-43-10 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-43-10

Johnston BTDJ, Graser HU. Integration of Dna markers into breedplan EBVs Proceedings of the Eighteenth Conference Matching Genetics and the Environment a New Look at and Old Topic. Proc Ass Adv Anim Bre Genet 2009; 18: 30-3.

Fadiel A, Anidi I, Eichenbaum KD. Farm animal genomics and informatics: an update. Nucleic Acids Res 2005; 33: 6308-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki931 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gki931

Michelizzi VN, Dodson MV, Pan Z, et al. Water Buffalo Genome Science Comes of Age. Int J Bio Sci 2010; 6: 333-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.6.333 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.6.333

Perucatti A, Di Meo GP, Vallinoto M, et al. FISH-mapping of LEP and SLC26A2 genes in sheep, goat and cattle R-banded chromosomes: comparison between bovine, ovine and caprine chromosome 4 (BTA4/OAR4/CHI4) and human chromosome 7 (HSA7). Cytogenet Genome Res 2006; 115: 7-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000094794 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000094794

Iannuzzi L, Di Meo GP, Perucatti A, et al. The river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis, 2n = 50) cytogenetic map: Assignment of 64 loci by fluorescence in situ hybridization and R-banding. Cytogenet. Genome Res 2003; 102: 65-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000075727 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000075727