Strengths and Dysfunctionalities of Formative Assessment: A Short Analysis from the Perspective of Romanian Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/2371-1655.2015.01.13Keywords:
Evaluation, performance, objectivity, evaluative strategies, evaluative skillsAbstract
Evaluation reflects the educationalists’ interest in understanding and improving the techniques and instruments of school assessment. Postmodern didactics brings forth a fresh perspective on the evaluation act, which is analysed not only as the final act of the instruction process, but also as a process meant to permanently adjust teaching and learning acts. The aim of this paper is to underline the evolution of evaluation theory and practice in Romanian education, emphasising both its benefits and drawbacks. The paper uses the extant research in the literature as well as personal knowledge of the author about the factors that are related to the improvement of didactic evaluation. Most of the results of these studies lead to the conclusion that building a culture of evaluation is necessary, that formative evaluation should valorise a wide range of strategies and docimologic tools in order to attain an objective evaluation, and to be able to employ its outcomes in designing the teaching-learning undertaking.
References
Bennet, R. E. 2011. “Formative assessment: A critical review”. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18: 1, 5-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2010.513678
Black, P. & Wiliam, D. 2009. “Developing the theory of formative assessment”, EducAsseEvalAcc, 21, 5-31. Retrieved from http://teacherscollegesj.edu/docs/47-developingthetheoryof-formativeassessment_12262012101200.pdf
Crundwell, R. M. 2005. “Alternative Strategies for Large Scale Student Assessment in Canada: Is Value-Added Assessment One Possible Answer”, Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, 41. Retrieved from https://www.umanitoba.ca/publications/cjeap/articles/crundwell.html
Cucoș, C. 2008. Teoria și metodologia evaluării, Editura Polirom, Iași
Fook, C. Y. & Sidhu, G. K. 2010. “Authentic Assessment and Pedagogical Strategies in Higher Education”, Journal of Social Sciences, 6 (2), 153-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2010.153.161
Gaytan, J. & McEwen, B. C. 2007. “Effective Online Instructional and Assessment Strategies”, American Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), 117-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08923640701341653
Nyberg, E. & Olander, M. H. 2015. “A Study of Formative Assessment Strategies in Teachers‘ School-Based In-Service Training”, International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 11 (1), 53-74
Perrenoud, Ph. 2004. “Évaluer des compétences”. L’Éducateur, n° spécial «La note en pleine évaluation », 8-11. Retrieved from http://www.unige.ch/fapse/SSE/teachers/perrenoud/php_main/php_2004/2004_01.html
Yaseen, O.S.B. 2013. “Educational Assessment Modern Strategies”. Journal of Education and Practice, 4 (1)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Policy for Journals/Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.