The Human Perspective in Consumer Ethics and Animal Welfare Issues: Envisioning a Future for Change
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/2371-1647.2022.08.01Keywords:
Animal welfare, sustainability, food diet, food consumptionAbstract
Animal welfare has been a subject of interest for the European Union since the 1970s, with the definition of animal protection guidelines during international transport, on farms and for slaughter. However, the Legislator’s concern found its highest expression in the Animal Welfare Protocol of the Treaty of Amsterdam, where animals are defined as sentient beings, therefore worthy of attention in the policies developed by the European Union and its Member States. Nowadays, the interpretation of the animal welfare concept as an element that contributes to increasing profitability is also integrated by respect for the animal’s feelings and, consequently, the related different biological manifestations. Food scandals and diseases, on the one hand, and the emergence of a new approach to consumer ethics, on the other, have also strongly sensitized the European population about the importance of protecting animal welfare. Based on the above considerations, this study provides a framework to understand whether animal welfare should merely be considered as a product of EU strategies dedicated to the economic and competitive performance of agricultural and agro-industrial enterprises or whether it can also be assessed as a useful tool to minimize the environmental impact, through breeding practices and food habits, and therefore encourage more sustainable development.
References
Dudek H, Krawiec M, Koszela G. Are Changes in Food Consumption in the European Union Environmentally Friendly? Zeszyty Naukowe SGGW w Warszawie. Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego 2015; 15: 33-40.
Soares BB, Alves EC, Maranduba HL, da Silva FF, de Albuquerque Fernandes SA, et al. Effect of handling and feeding strategies in the environmental performance of buffalo milk in Northeastern Brazil. Int J Life Cycle Ass 2019; 24: 1129-1138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-018-1547-4
Hu Y, Han Y, Zhang Y. Land desertification and its influencing factors in Kazakhstan. J Arid Environ 2020; 180: 104203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2020.104203
Kuden AB. Climate change affects fruit crops. Acta Hortic 2020; 1281: 437-440. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2020.1281.57
UN. Our common future (Brundtland Report) [Internet]. UNWCED; 1987. Available from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf
UN. Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development. From our origin to the future [Internet]. Available from: https://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/WSSD_POI_PD/English/POI_PD.htm
Krajnc D, Glavič P. A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 2005; 43: 189-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(04)00120-X
Peri C. Qualità: concetti e metodi. Milano: Franco Angeli editore, 1994.
Peri C. The universe of food quality, Food Qual Pref 2006; 17: 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.03.002
Gaviglio A, Pirani A. Consumer Perception of Cured Pork Meats: The Added Value of the Organic Attribute. Czech J Food Sci 2015; 33: 32-36. https://doi.org/10.17221/233/2014-CJFS
Guyomard H, Bouamra-Mechemache Z, Chatellier V, Delaby L, Détang-Dessendre C, et al. Review: Why and how to regulate animal production and consumption: The case of the European Union. Animal 2021; 15: 100283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2021.100283
Vogeler CS, Hornung J, Bandelow NC. Farm animal welfare policymaking in the European Parliament: a social identity perspective on voting behaviour. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 2020; 22: 518-530. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1778458
Duarte R, Pinilla V, Serrano A. Globalization and natural resources: the expansion of Spanish agrifood trade and its impact on water consumption 1965-2010. Reg Environ Change 2016; 16: 259-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0752-3
Malassis L. Politique agricole, politique alimentaire, politique agroalimentaire. Économie Rurale 1992; 211: 47-52. https://doi.org/10.3406/ecoru.1992.4492
Lamarque P, Lambin EF. The effectiveness of marked-based instruments to foster the conservation of extensive land use: The case of Geographical Indications in the French Alps. Land Use Policy 2015; 42: 706-717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.10.009
Wolff F, Schönherr N. The impact evaluation of sustainable consumption policy instruments. J Consum Policy 2011; 34: 43-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-010-9152-3
Cederberg C, Hedenus F, Wirsenius S, Sonesson U. Trends in greenhouse gas emissions from consumption and production of animal food products - Implications for long-Term climate targets. Animal 2013; 7: 330-340. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731112001498
Watson M, Browne A, Evans D, Foden M, Hoolohan C, Sharp L. Challenges and opportunities for re-framing resource use policy with practice theories: The change points approach. Global Environ Chang 2020; 62: 102072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102072
Aschemann-Witzel J, Zielke S. Can’t Buy Me Green? A Review of Consumer Perceptions of and Behavior Toward the Price of Organic Food. J Consum Aff 2015. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12092
Gerini F, Alfnes F, Schjoll A. Organic- and Animal Welfare-labelled Eggs: Competing for the Same consumers? J Agr Econ 2016; 67: 471-490. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12154
Gracia A, De Magistris T. Consumer preferences for food labeling: What ranks first? Food Control 2016; 61: 39-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.09.023
Bollani L, Peira G, Varese E, Nesi E, Pairotti MB, Bonadonna A. Labelling and sustainability in the green food economy: Perception among millennials with a good cultural back-ground. Review of Studies on Sustainability 2017; 2: 83-101. https://doi.org/10.3280/RISS2017-002007
Bollani L, Bonadonna A, Peira G. The millennials’ concept of sustainability in the food sector Sustainability 2019; 10(11): 2984. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11102984
Bollani L, Bonadonna A. Consumer ethics and animal welfare issues: changing the ‘human landscape’. In Food, Sustainability, Nutrition and Tourism. Tirana: International Academic Research Center Str. (IARC-ETQA Publishers); 2021.
Moresi M. Assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in the food industry. Agro Food Ind Hi Tec 2014; 25: 53-62.
Westhoek H, Lesschen JP, Rood T, Wagner S, De Marco A, Murphy-Bokern D, et al. Food choices, health and environment: effects of cutting Europe’s meat and dairy intake. Global Environ Chang 2014; 26: 196-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.02.004
Cavaliere A, Peri M, Banterle A. Vertical coordination in organic food chains: A survey based analysis in France, Italy and Spain. Sustainability 2016; 8(6): 569. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8060569
Schmitt E, Galli F, Menozzi D, Maye D, Touzard J, Marescotti A, et al. Comparing the sustainability of local and global food products in Europe. J Clean Prod 2017; 165: 346-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.039
Vogeler CS. Why do farm animal welfare regulations vary between EU Member States? A comparative analysis of societal and party political determinants in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK. J Common Mark Stud 2019; 57: 317-335. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12794
Phillips CJ, Molento CF. Animal Welfare Centres: Are They Useful for the Improvement of animal Welfare? Animals 2020; 10: 877. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10050877
EU, Overview report Welfare of Cattle on Dairy Farms [Internet]. 2017. Available from: file:///C:/Users/abonadon/ Downloads/Final%20merged%20report.pdf
Ghione J, Matarrese AM, Ponzio R, Sardo P. Sondaggio sui Consumi di Carne e sul Benessere Animale Rivolto Ai Soci Slow Food Europei [Internet]. Bra: Slow Food; 2013. Available from: https://www.slowfood.com/sloweurope/wp-content/uploads/ITA_sondaggio_benessere.pdf, accessed on 10 July 2020
Heng Y, Peterson HH, Li X. Consumer attitudes toward farm-animal welfare: The case of laying hens. J Agr Resour Econ 2013; 38: 418-434.
Sajdakowska M, Gębski J, Guzek D, Gutkowska K, Żakowska-Biemans S. Dairy products quality from a consumer point of view: Study among Polish adults. Nutrients 2020; 12: 1503. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12051503
Boaitey A, Minegishi K. Who are farm animal welfare conscious consumers? Brit Food J 2020. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-08-2019-0634
Heerwagen LR, Mørkbak MR, Denver S, Sandøe P, Christensen T. The Role of Quality Labels in Market-Driven Animal Welfare. J Agric Environ Ethics 2015; 28: 67-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-014-9521-z
My NHD, Demont M, Van Loo EJ, De Guia A, Rutsaert P, Tuan TH, et al. What is the value of sustainably-produced rice? Consumer evidence from experimental auctions in Vietnam. Food Policy 2018; 79: 283-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2018.08.004
Silva AG, Canavari M, Wander AE. Consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay for integrated production label on common beans. Economia Agro-Alimentare 2018; 20: 11-28. https://doi.org/10.3280/ECAG2018-001002
Kirby DS, Visser C, Hanich Q. Assessment of eco-labelling schemes for Pacific tuna fisheries. Mar Policy 2014; 43: 132-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2013.05.004
De Magistris T, Del Giudice T, Verneau F. The Effect of Information on Willingness to Pay for Canned Tuna Fish with Different Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Certification: A Pilot Study. J Consum Aff 2015; 49: 457-471. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12046
EU. Evaluation of the EU Strategy on Animal Welfare (2012-2015) [Internet]. 2021. Available from: https://food.ec.europa. eu/animals/animal-welfare/evaluations-and-impact-assessment/evaluation-eu-strategy-animal-welfare_en
European Parliament. Animal welfare on the farm – ex-post evaluation of EU legislation: Prospects for animal welfare labelling at EU level [Internet]. 2021. Available from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/fr/document/EPRS_STU(2021)662643
Silalertruksa T, Gheewala SH, Pongpat P, Kaenchan P, Permpool N, Lecksiwilai N, et al. Environmental sustainability of oil palm cultivation in different regions of Thailand: Greenhouse gases and water use impact. J Clean Prod 2018; 167: 1009-1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.069
Caputo V, Vassilopoulos A, Nayga RMJ, Canavari M. Welfare effects of food miles labels. J Consum Aff 2013; 47: 311-327. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12009
Bazzani C, Canavari M. Is local a matter of food miles or food traditions? Ital J Food Sci 2017; 29: 505-517.
De Magistris T, Gracia A, Barreiro-Hurle J. Do consumers care about European food labels? An empirical evaluation using best-worst method. Brit Food J 2017; 119: 2698-2711. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-11-2016-0562
Moresi M. Assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions in the food industry. Agro Food Industry Hi-Tech 2014; 25(3): 53-62.
Moresi M, Valentini R. Dieta Mediterranea e impatto ambientale. Ind Aliment-Italy 2010; 502: 9-20.
Pairotti MB, Cerutti AK, Martini F, Vesce E, Padovan D, Beltramo R. Energy consumption and GHG emission of the Mediterranean diet: a systemic assessment using a hybrid LCA-IO method. J Clean Prod 2015; 103: 507-516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.082
Kwiatkowska E. The influence of the parents’ education on the frequency of vegetable and fruit consumption by their children. Annals of the National Institute of Hygiene 2010; 61: 179-182
Gheribi E. Consumption of fruit and vegetable in Polish households in the period of 2004–2008. Scientific Journal of Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW Economics 2012; 95: 67-77.
De Boer J, Aiking H. Considering how farm animal welfare concerns may contribute to more sustainable diets. Appetite 2022; 168: 105786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105786
Janssen M, Busch C, Rodiger M, Hamm U. Motives of consumers following a vegan diet and their attitudes towards animal agriculture. Appetite 2016; 105: 643e651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.06.039
Stanco M, Lerro M. Consumers' preferences for and perception of CSR initiatives in the wine sector. Sustainability 2020; 12: 5230. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135230
Stampa E, Schipmann-Schwarze C, Hamm U. Consumer perceptions, preferences, and behavior regarding pasture-raised livestock products: A review. Food Qual Prefer 2020; 82: 103872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.103872
Lioutas ED, Charatsari C. Smart farming and short food supply chains: Are they compatible? Land Use Policy 2020; 94: 104541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104541
Fernandes JN, Hemsworth PH, Coleman GJ, Tilbrook AJ. Costs and benefits of improving farm animal welfare. Agriculture 2021; 11(104): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11020104
Rivero MJ, Lee MRF. A perspective on animal welfare of grazing ruminants and its relationship with sustainability. Anim Prod Sci 2022. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN21516
Yeh CH, Hartmann M. To purchase or not to purchase? Drivers of consumers’ preferences for animal welfare in their meat choice. Sustainability 2021; 13(16): 9100. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169100
Chen M, Hu E, Kuen LL, Wu L. Study on Consumer Preference for Traceable Pork With Animal Welfare Attribute. Front Psychol 2021; 12: 675554. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.675554
Infascelli L, Tudisco R, Iommelli P, Capitanio F. Milk quality and animal welfare as a possible marketing lever for the economic development of rural areas in southern Italy. Animals 2021; 11: 1059. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11041059
Jiang R, Sharma C, Bryant R, Mohan MS, Al-Marashdeh O, Harrison R, et al. Animal welfare information affects consumers’ hedonic and emotional responses towards milk. Food Res Int 2021; 141: 110006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.110006
Vukina T, Nestic D. Paying for animal welfare? A hedonic analysis of egg prices. Agribusiness 2020; 36: 613-630. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21658
Xu L, Yang X, Wu L, Chen X, Chen L, Tsai FS. Consumers’ willingness to pay for food with information on animal welfare, lean meat essence detection, and traceability. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019; 16: 3616. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193616
Frey UJ, Pirscher F. Willingness to pay and moral stance: The case of farm animal welfare in Germany. PLoS ONE 2018; 13: e0202193. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202193
Achabou MA. Is animal welfare a central issue for consumers of luxury goods? Nat Resour Forum 2021; 45: 18-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12211
Rubini G, Nannoni E, Di Pasquale J, Martelli G, Sardi L. Update on animal welfare perception by italian consumers: A descriptive survey. Italian J Food Sci 2021; 10: 9588. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2021.9588
Alonso ME, González-Montaña JR, Lomillos JM. Consumers’ concerns and perceptions of farm animal welfare. Animals 2020; 10: 385. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10030385
Tomasevic I, Bahelka I, Čítek J, Čandek-Potokar M, Djekić I, Getya A, et al. Attitudes and beliefs of Eastern European consumers towards animal welfare. Animals 2020; 10(1220): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10071220
Estévez-Moreno LX, Miranda-de la Lama GC, Miguel-Pacheco GG. Consumer attitudes towards farm animal welfare in Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and Bolivia: A segmentation-based study. Meat Sci 2022; 187: 108747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2022.108747
Washio T, Ohashi T, Saijo M. What Promotes Intention? Factors Influencing Consumers’ Intention to Purchase Animal-Welfare Friendly Beef in Japan. Comm Com Inf Sc 2020; 1297: 536-549. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66196-0_25
Kitano S, Mitsunari Y, Yoshino A. The impact of information asymmetry on animal welfare-friendly consumption: Evidence from milk market in Japan. Ecol Econ 2022; 191: 107230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107230
Heinola K, Kauppinen T, Niemi JK, Wallenius E, Raussi S. Comparison of 12 different animal welfare labeling schemes in the pig sector. Animals 2021; 11: 2430. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11082430
More SJ, Marchewka J, Hanlon A, Balzani A, Boyle L. An evaluation of four private animal health and welfare standards and associated quality assurance programmes for dairy cow production. Food Policy 2021; 105: 102169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102169
Sonesson UG, Lorentzon K, Andersson A, Barr U-K, Bertilsson J, Borch E, et al. Paths to a sustainable food sector: integrated design and LCA of future food supply chains: the case of pork production in Sweden. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2016; 21: 664-676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-015-0969-5
Eurobarometer. Attitudes of Europeans towards Animal Welfare [Internet]. March 2016. Available from: https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2096
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Policy for Journals/Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
Policy for Journals / Manuscript with Paid Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Publisher retain copyright .
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work .
