Understanding Consumers’ Attitudes Toward Fruits and Vegetable Attributes: A Multi-Method Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-5634.2015.04.03.3Keywords:
Consumer Preferences, Purchasing Behavior, Fruits and Vegetables, Tobit, Fuzzy Pairwise ComparisonAbstract
Background: Results from previous work indicated that when consumers make purchasing decisions, they pay more attention to freshness, taste and hygiene attributes of fruits and vegetables than price and nutritional value, when these attributes are considered individually.
Methods: To shed light on the underlying factors that shape the pattern of reported preferences, researchers used five doubly censored Tobit models to analyze data generated from a fuzzy pairwise comparison model (FPC) to explain the pattern of reported preferences. In the model, nutritive value, hygiene, taste, price and freshness were separately regressed on a number of demographic and personal characteristics variables. For this study, a random sample was drawn proportionate to population size by county in Georgia, North Carolina and South Carolina. Data were collected from 412 respondents.
Results: Higher levels of education and income did not affect how consumers rate the nutritional value of fruits and vegetables. This relative lack of difference among consumers as classified in the model, along with results that showed consumers giving a higher preference rating to hygiene, taste and price offer support for the notion that the nutritional value attribute plays a subsidiary role in consumers purchasing decisions.
Conclusion: The multi-method approach used in this study provides information on the demographic characteristics of consumers that influence attitudes and behaviors toward fruit and vegetable attributes. Nutrition educators and marketers will be able to use this knowledge about consumers’ attitudes and behaviors to customize programs that more accurately address consumers’ preferences.
References
McShane S, Von Glinow M. Organizational behavior. New York: Irwin McGraw Hill 2004.
Hoyer WD, MacInnis DJ. Consumer behavior. 5th ed. Ohio: South-Western Cengage Learning 2008.
Voon JP, Ngui KS, Agrawal A. Determinants of willingness to purchase organic food: An exploratory study using structural equation modeling. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 2011; 14: 103-20
Chen MF. The gender gap in food choice motives as determinants of consumers’ attitudes toward GM foods in Taiwan. British Food Journal 2011; 113: 697-709. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00070701111140052 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00070701111140052
Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall 1980. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1991; 50: 179-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Gotschi E, Vogel S, Lindenthal T, Larcher M. The role of knowledge, social norms, and attitudes toward organic products and shopping behavior: survey results from high school students in Vienna. The Journal of Environmental Education 2010; 41: 88-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00958960903295225 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00958960903295225
Chen MF. An integrated research framework to understand consumer attitudes and purchase intentions toward genetically modified foods. British Food Journal 2008; 110: 559-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00070700810877889 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700810877889
Vermeir I, Verbeke W. Sustainable food consumption among young adults in Belgium: Theory of planned behaviour and the role of confidence and values. Ecological Economics 2008; 64: 542-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.007
Gao Z, House LO, Gmitter FG, Valim MF, Plotto A, Baldwin, EA. Consumer preferences for fresh citrus: impacts of demographic and behavioral characteristics. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 2011; 14: 23-40.
Moser R, Raffaelli R, Thilmany-McFadden D. Consumer preferences for fruit and vegetables with credence-based attributes: a review. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 2011; 14: 121-42.
Ernst S, Batte MT, Darby K, Worley T. 2006. What matters in consumer berry preferences: Price? source? quality?. Journal of Distribution Research 2011; 37: 68-71.
Onozaka Y, Bunch D, Larson D. What exactly are they paying for? Explaining the price premium for organic fresh produce. Agricultural and Resources Economics 2006; 9: 1-4.
Boccaletti S, Nardella M. Consumer willingness to pay for pesticide-free fresh fruit and vegetables in Italy. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 2000; 3: 297-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7508(01)00049-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7508(01)00049-0
Morteza H, Hobbs JE, McNamara L. Assessing consumer preferences for organically grown fresh fruit and vegetables in Eastern New Brunswick. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 2009; 12: 81-100.
Darby K, Batte MT, Ernst S, Roe B. Decomposing local: A conjoint analysis of locally produced foods. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2008; 90: 476-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01111.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01111.x
Thilmany DD, Bond CA, Keeling Bond J. Going local: Exploring consumer behavior and motivations for direct food purchase. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 2008; 90: 1303-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01221.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01221.x
Rodriguez-Ibeas R. Environmental product differentiation and environmental awareness. Environmental and Resources Economics 2007; 36: 237-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10640-006-9026-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-006-9026-y
Caputo V, Nayga RM, Canavari M. Organic consumers’ valuation for food miles labels.119th EAAE Seminar 2010: June 30-July 2; Capri, Italy.
Dillman D, Smyth J, Christian L. Internet, mail, and mixed mode surveys: The total design method. 3rd ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons 2009.
Gunden C, Thomas T. Assessing consumer attitudes towards fresh fruit and vegetable attributes. Journal of Food Agriculture & Environment 2012; 10: 85-88.
Van Kooten GC, Schoney RA, Hayward KA. An alternative approach to the evaluation of goal hierarchies among farmers. Western J Agric Econ 1986; 11: 40-49.
Ramanathan R. Introductory econometrics with applications. Fort Worth: The Dryden Press 1997.
Greene W. Econometric analysis. 5th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall 2003.
Groves RM, Fowler FJ, Couper MP, Lepkowski JM, Singer E, Tourangeau R. Survey Methodology. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Wiley 2009.
Thomas T, Gunden C. Investigating consumer attitudes toward food produced via three production systems: Conventional, sustainable and organic. Journal of Food Agriculture & Environment 2012; 10: 55-58.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Policy for Journals/Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
Policy for Journals / Manuscript with Paid Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Publisher retain copyright .
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work .
