Simulative Comparison between Electric and Thermal Powertrains on Different Real Road Missions

Authors

  • Lorenzo Damiani University of Genoa
  • Jacopo Dellachà University of Genoa
  • Matteo Repetto University of Genoa
  • Alessandro Pini Prato University of Genoa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6002.2015.04.02.1

Keywords:

Electric mobility, simulation model, comparative assessment, Matlab-Simulink, carbon dioxide Reduction, car sharing

Abstract

Pure electric mobility is still struggling to emerge in the present road vehicles scenario. This is mostly due to costs, nowadays still very high, and to battery range, which is intrinsically very limited with respect to the fuel tank of a traditional vehicle.

To be effectively competitive, e-mobility should not be thought as the mere substitution of the thermal powertrain with the electric one on the same vehicle; instead, a holistic approach comprehensive of the integration of a charging network within the territory should be adopted. The vehicles should be tailored on the missions to be accomplished promoting the lightness, simplicity and low cost, and should be integrated within a charging infrastructure and a car-sharing system implemented in the reference territory.

In this paper the authors aim at exposing their idea of e-mobility, justifying it by simulations carried out on three different vehicles (a Diesel-fuelled Renault Kangoo, an electric driven Renault Kangoo and an electric micro-vehicle Renault Twizy) and experimental data. The simulations were carried out with the help of a validated road vehicle model in different real road missions, namely a urban, an extra-urban and a mountain mission.

References

Organisation for Economic Co-operation Development. International road traffic and accident database (IRTAD) 2003.

Takeshita T. Assessing the co-benefits of CO2 mitigation on air pollutants emissions from road vehicles. Applied Energy 2012; 97: 225-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.12.029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.12.029

Chan C. The state of the art of electric, hybrid, and fuel cell vehicles. Proc IEEE 2007; 95: 704-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2007.892489 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2007.892489

Clement-Nyns K, Haesen E, Driesen J. The Impact of Charging Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles on a Residential Distribution Grid. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2010; 25(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2036481 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2009.2036481

Fernández LP, San Román TG, Cossent R, Domingo CM, Frías P. Assessment of the Impact of Plug-in Electric Vehicles on Distribution Networks. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 2011; 26(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2049133

Green II RC, Wang L, Alam M. The impact of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles on distribution networks: A review and outlook. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2011; 15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.08.015

Boschetti G, Repetto M, Damiani L, Pini Prato A. Simulation model for the analysis of road vehicles global efficiency. Urban Transport XVII, Environment in the 21st Century 2011.

Shuai S, Youtong Z. A research on the fuel quantity control for common rail diesel engine in the hybrid electric vehicles working on the low-load area. ICIEA 2009, 4th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications p. 440-4.

Damiani L, Repetto M, Pini Prato A. Improvement of powertrain efficiency through energy breakdown analysis. Applied Energy 2014; 121: 252-263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.12.067 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.12.067

Boschetti G, Repetto M, Damiani L, Pini Prato A. Simulation model for the analysis of road vehicles global efficiency. Urban Transport XVII, Environment in the 21st Century 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2495/UT110561

Damiani L, Dellachà J, Pini Prato A, Revetria R. Simulation model of a node for Smart Grid applications, equipped with photovoltaic panel, energy storage and electric vehicle. Journal of Technology Innovations in Renewable Energy 2014; 3: 199-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.6000/1929-6002.2014.03.04.7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6002.2014.03.04.7

Tremblay O, Dessaint LA. Experimental validation of a battery dynamic model for EV applications. World Electric Vehicle Journal 2009; 3. ISSN 2032-6653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj3020289

Tremblay O, Dessaint LA, Dekkiche AI. A generic battery model for the dynamic simulation of hybrid electric vehicles. Proceedings of IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/VPPC.2007.4544139

Shepherd CM. Design of primary and secondary cells – part 2: an equation describing battery discharge. Journal of Electrochemical Society 1965; 112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2423518

Capasso C, Veneri O. Experimental analysis on the performance of lithium based batteries for road full electric and hybrid vehicles. Applied Energy 2014; 136: 921-930, ISSN 0306-2619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.013

Downloads

Published

2015-06-15

How to Cite

Damiani, L., Dellachà, J., Repetto, M., & Prato, A. P. (2015). Simulative Comparison between Electric and Thermal Powertrains on Different Real Road Missions. Journal of Technology Innovations in Renewable Energy, 4(2), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6002.2015.04.02.1

Issue

Section

Articles