Sensory Acceptability of Buffalo Meat and Beef in Young Consumers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-520X.2025.14.05Keywords:
Consumers, beef, buffalo meat, sensory properties, quality, acceptabilityAbstract
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensory acceptability of buffalo meat compared to beef, as well as to evaluate the perception of buffalo meat.
Methods: The study was conducted with young meat consumers, who responded to a questionnaire with four sections: 1) sociodemographic aspects, 2) consumer preferences, 3) hedonic acceptability, and 4) perception of buffalo meat consumption. Three 2.5 cm thick steaks (Longissimus thoracis et lumborum) were compared: 1) select beef (slight marbling); 2) select buffalo meat (slight marbling); 3) prime beef (abundant marbling). The samples were evaluated by 76 young meat consumers (non-trained panelists). A seven-point hedonic scale was used to assess appearance, odor, flavor, tenderness, juiciness, and overall acceptability.
Results: The results indicated that prime beef presented a better appearance (P=0.0042) and tenderness (P<0.0001) compared to select buffalo and select beef, respectively. Similarly, a higher score was observed in juiciness for prime beef (5.52±0.19 points), but a better score for buffalo meat compared to beef select was identified (4.52±0.18 points vs. 3.86±0.19 points, respectively; P<0.001). Most of the panelists indicated that prior to the study, they had not consumed buffalo meat (89.00%/n=68). However, they noted that buffalo meat was like select beef (71.00%/n=54). The panelist highlighted various reasons why buffalo meat is not commonly consumed, such as there is no information on the buffalo meat (93.42%/n=71), limited availability of buffalo meat products (60.52%/n =46), and unavailability at supermarkets (73.69%/n=56).
Conclusions: Buffalo meat can be a good option for young consumers. However, more information about buffalo meat characteristics (chemical, nutritional, sensory properties, and technological quality) and improved marketing channels that ensure the availability of buffalo products are important.
References
Turan A, Yalcintan H, Orman A, Ekiz B. Effects of gender and slaughter age on meat quality of Anatolian water buffaloes. Trop Anim Health Prod 2021; 53: 2-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02835-8
Minervino AHH, Zava M, Vecchio D, Borghese A, Bubalus bubalis: A Short Story. Front Vet Sci 2020; 7: 570413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.570413
Di Stasio L, Brugiapaglia A. Current Knowledge on River Buffalo Meat: A Critical Analysis. Animals 2021; 11: 2111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11072111
Jaspal MH, Badar IH, Ghani MU, Ijaz M, Yar MK, Manzoor A, et al. effect of packaging type and aging on the meat quality characteristics of water buffalo bulls. Animals 2022; 12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12020130
Vaz RZ, de Sá H, Sartori DBS, Costa PT, Fluck AC, Kröning AB, et al. Trade and consumption of buffalo meat in Brazil. Meat Sci 2024; 208: 109399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2023.109399
Tamburrano A, Tavazzi B, Callà CAM, Amorini AM, Lazzarino G, Vincenti S, et al. Biochemical and nutritional characteristics of buffalo meat and potential implications on human health for personalized nutrition. Ital J Food Saf 2019; 8: 8317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/ijfs.2019.8317
Naveena BM, Kiran M. Buffalo meat quality, composition, and processing characteristics: Contribution to the global economy and nutritional security. Animal Front 2014; 4: 18-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/af.2014-0029
Baran B, Yilmaz I, Geçgel U. Determination of Some Quality Parameters of Buffalo Meat. J Tekirdag Agr Facul 2023; 20: 677-687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33462/jotaf.1233124
de la Cruz L, Gibson TJ, Guerrero-Legarreta I, Napolitano F, Mora-Medina P, The welfare of water buffaloes during the slaughter process: A review. Livest Sci 2018; 212: 22-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2018.03.014
Andrade BF, Paula MMdO, Carneiro JdDS, Fontes PR, Torres Filho RdA, Ramos EM, et al., Influence of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on the sensory perception and intention to purchase buffalo meat by consumers in Southeast Brazil. Braz J Food Tech 2022; 25: 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-6723.00222
Canozzi ME, Ávila SL, McManus PCM, Jardim BJO, Candal PCH, Bergmann GP, et al. Sensory evaluation of beef and buffalo extensively reared and its relationship to sociodemographic characteristics of consumers. Semin Cien Agrar 2016; 37: 1617-1627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n3p1617
Kumari S, Alam AN, Hossain MJ, Lee EY, Hwang YH, Joo ST. Sensory evaluation of plant-based meat: bridging the gap with animal meat, challenges and future prospects. Foods 2023; 13: 108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13010108
Font-i-Furnols M, Guerrero L, Consumer preference, behavior and perception about meat and meat products: An overview. Meat Sci 2014; 98: 361-371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.06.025
Napolitano F, Castellini C, Naspetti S, Piasentier E, Girolami A, Braghieri A, Consumer preference for chicken breast may be more affected by information on organic production than by product sensory properties. Poult Sci 2013; 92: 820-826. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02633
Asociación Médica Mundial (AMM), Declaración de Helsinki de la Asociación Médica Mundial. Arbor 2008; 184: 349-352.
NOM-004-SAGARPA-2018, Carne de bovino-Clasificación de canales conforme a sus características de madurez fisiológica y marmoleo. Secretaria de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural (SADER). Available from: https://www.dof.gob.mx/ nota_detalle.php?codigo=5605515&fecha=23/11/2020
Prieto N, Lopez-Campos O, Suman SP, Uttaro B, Rodas-Gonzalez A, Aalhus JL. Exploring innovative possibilities of recovering the value of dark-cutting beef in the Canadian grading system. Meat Sci 2018; 137: 77-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.11.013
Sorapukdee S, Tangwatcharin P. Quality of steak restructured from beef trimmings containing microbial transglutaminase and impacted by freezing and grading by fat level. Asian Australas J Anim Sci 2018; 31: 129-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0170
Douthit TL, Bormann JM, Kouba JM. A retrospective look at students enrolled in an upper-level horse science class: Factors that affect classroom performance. J Anim Sci 2013, 91: 2976-2984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5936
Estévez-Moreno LX, Miranda-de la Lama GC. Meat consumption and consumer attitudes in Mexico: Can persistence lead to change? Meat Sci 2022; 193: 108943. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2022.108943
Cutrignelli MI, Calabrò S, Bovera F, Tudisco R, D’Urso S, Marchiello M, Piccolo V, Infascelli F. Effects of two protein sources and energy level of diet on the performance of young Marchigiana bulls. 1. Infra vitam performance and carcass quality. Ital J Anim Sci 2008; 7: 271-285. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2008.271
Mammasse N, Schlich P. Adequate number of consumers in a liking test. Insights from resampling in seven studies, Food Qual Prefer 2014; 31: 124-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.01.009
Silva PRA, Tavares FMC, Menezes WNML, Freire AT, Carvalho VPF. How do consumers evaluate buffalo meat? Rev Cient Fac Cienc Vet Univ Zulia 2023; XXXIII: 163-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52973/rcfcv-wbc039
Marques CSS, Oaigen RP, Moraes CMd, Santos MASd, Lourenço-Júnior JdB, Abel I. Segmentation of the buffalo meat consumer market in Belém, Pará, Brazil. Rev Bras Zootec 2016; 45: 336-344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-92902016000600008
Hamad UHS, Murtaza SHA, Farooq MI, Nawaz M, Khan A, Yaqoob M, et al. Effect of Physiological State on Meat Quality: An Insight from Buffalo. Uni Sindh J Anim Sci 2024; 8: 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57038/usjas.v8i01.6954
Islam S, Nahar TN, Begum J, Deb GK, Khatun M, Mustafa A. Study on Consumers’ Behavior on Buffen (Buffalo meat): MarketingPerspective. J Food Res 2018; 7: 77-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jfr.v7n2p77
Lapitan RM, Del Barrio AN, Katsube O, Ban-Tokuda T, Orden EA, Robles AY, et al. Comparison of carcass and meat characteristics of Brahman grade cattle (Bos indicus) and crossbred water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) fed on high roughage diet. Anim Sci J 2008; 79: 210-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2008.00519.x
Rao VA, Thulasi G, Ruban SW. Effect of age and sex on meat quality characteristics of South Indian non-descript buffalo, Buffalo Bull 2009; 28: 138-147.
Garmyn A. Consumer Preferences and Acceptance of Meat Products. Foods 2020; 9: 708. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9060708
Napolitano F, Braghieri A, Piasentier E, Favotto S, Naspetti S, Zanoli R. Effect of information about organic production on beef liking and consumer willingness to pay, Food Qual Prefer 2010; 21: 207-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.08.007
Failla S, Buffalo meat quality, processing, and marketing: harnessing its benefits and nutraceutical potential. Rev Cient Fac Cienc Vet Univ Zulia 2023; XXXIII: 105-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52973/rcfcv-wbc016
Naveena BM, Kiran M, Banerjee R, Muthukumar M, Water buffalo. In: Dikeman M, editor. Encyclopedia of Meat Sciences. 3rd ed. Oxford: Elsevier 2024; pp. 624-633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-85125-1.00078-8
Kandeepan G, Anjaneyulu ASR, Kondaiah N, Mendiratta SK, Lakshmanan V. Effect of age and gender on the processing characteristics of buffalo meat, Meat Sci 2009; 83: 10-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.03.003
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Policy for Journals/Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
