Double Expectations: Law Enforcement Workers and Dilemmas on Handling Drug Use at the Street Level

Rafaela de Quadros Rigoni

doi:10.6000/1929-4409.2017.06.11

Authors

Rafaela de Quadros Rigoni Utrecht University, The Netherlands

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2017.06.11

Keywords:

Law enforcement, drug policy, street-level bureaucracy

Abstract

This paper analyses law enforcement workers’ experiences when transforming policies for crack cocaine and heroin into practice. It focuses on dilemmas workers have and choices they make when approaching drug users. Grounded theory principles and ethnographic techniques were used to gather and analyse in depth interviews and extensive participant observations of 20 workers across the cities of Amsterdam (Netherlands) and Porto Alegre (Brazil). The comparative analysis enables to explore the impact of different socio-economic and political environments on workers’ practices around drug use. Three areas in which law enforcement workers reported to have dilemmas concern workers’ choices on how to deal with violence; choices between being tough or friendly towards users; and on defining their role on curbing public nuisance. If a first sight shows differences between the cities, in a closer look interesting similarities appear. When deciding upon approaching drug users, law enforcement workers drift between order and care approaches. At the street level, different contexts produce ambiguities and workers’ experiences question the etic reductionism in simple dichotomies of care vs. order approaches. From this closer perspective, similarities appear more clearly, as well as counterpoising perspectives to the stereotypical views of Dutch and Brazilian workers.

References

Aitken, C., Moore, D., Higgs, P., Kelsall, J. and Kerger, M., 2002. The impact of a police crackdown on a street drug scene: evidence from the street. International Journal of Drug Policy, 13(3), pp. 193-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-3959(02)00075-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-3959(02)00075-0

Beletsky, L., Macalino, G.E. and Burris, S., 2005. Attitudes of police officers towards syringe access, occupational needle-sticks, and drug use: A qualitative study of one city police department in the United States. International Journal of Drug Policy, 16(4), pp. 267-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2005.01.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2005.01.009

Beyer, L., Crofts, N. and Reid, G., 2002. Drug offending and criminal justice responses: practitioners’ perspectives. International Journal of Drug Policy, 13(3), pp. 203-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-3959(02)00063-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0955-3959(02)00063-4

Brazil, 2006. Lei Nº 11.343, de 23 de Agosto. Presidência da República. Casa Civil. Subchefia para Assuntos Jurídicos.

Brazil, 2003. A política do Ministério da Saúde para Atenção Integral a Usuários de Álcool e Outras Drogas. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria Executiva. Coordenação Nacional de DST/Aids.

Brazil, 1976. Lei Nº 6.368, de 21 de Outubro de 1976. Law edn. Presidencia da República. Subchefia para Assuntos Jurídicos.

Bryant, A. and Charmaz, K., 2010. The SAGE handbook of grounded theory. Los Angeles i.e. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE Publications.

Bueno, R., 2007. The Latin American harm reduction network (RELARD): Successes and challenges. International Journal of Drug Policy, 18(2), pp. 145-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2007.01.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2007.01.004

Bull, M., 2005. A comparative review of best practice guidelines for the diversion of drug related offenders. International Journal of Drug Policy, 16(4), pp. 223-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2005.05.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2005.05.007

Carvalho, S., 2006. A Politica Criminal de Drogas no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Lumen Juris.

Coimbra, C., 2001. Tortura ontem e Hoje: Resgatando uma Certa História. Psicologia em Estudo, 6(2), pp. 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-73722001000200003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-73722001000200003

Connolly, J., 2006. Responding to open drug scenes and drug-related crime and public nuisance - towards a partnership approach. Strasbourg: Pompidou Group, Council of Europe.

Cooper, H., Moore, L., Gruskin, S. and Krieger, N., 2005. The impact of a police drug crackdown on drug injectors’ ability to practice harm reduction: A qualitative study. Social science & medicine, 61(3), pp. 673-684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.030

Das, D., Huberts, L. and Ronald, V.S., 2007. The changing “soul” of Dutch policing: Responses to new security demands and the relationship with Dutch tradition. Policing, 30(3), pp. 518-532. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639510710778877 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13639510710778877

Davis, C.S., Burris, S., Kraut-Becher, J., Lynch, K.G. and Metzger, D., 2005. Effects of an Intensive Street-Level Police Intervention on Syringe Exchange Program Use in Philadelphia, Pa. American Journal of Public Health, 95(2), pp. 233. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2003.033563 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2003.033563

De Kort, M. and Cramer, T., 1999. Pragmatism Versus Ideology: Dutch Drug Policy Continued. Journal of Drug Issues, 29(3), pp. 473-492. https://doi.org/10.1177/002204269902900303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002204269902900303

EMCDDA, 2017-last update, Countries overviews. Drug Situation [Homepage of European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction], [Online]. Available: http://www.emcdda. europa.eu/countries/netherlands [08/12, 2015].

Estado do rio Grande do sul, 2010. Lei Estadual n. 13.468, de 15 de junho de 2010.

Evans, T., 2010. Professional discretion in welfare services : beyond street-level bureaucracy. Farnham: Ashgate.

Forman, R.F., Bovasso, G. and Woody, G., 2001. Staff beliefs about addiction treatment. Journal of substance abuse treatment, 21(1), pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-5472(01)00173-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-5472(01)00173-8

Hedrich, D., Pirona, A. and Wiessing, L., 2008. From margin to mainstream: The evolution of harm reduction responses to problem drug use in Europe. 15, pp. 503-517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09687630802227673

Humphreys, K., Noke, J.M. and Moos, R.H., 1996. Recovering substance abuse staff members' beliefs about addiction. Journal of substance abuse treatment, 13(1), pp. 75-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/0740-5472(95)02019-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0740-5472(95)02019-5

Hunter, G., Mcsweeney, T. and Turnbull, P.J., 2005. The introduction of drug Arrest Referral schemes in London: A partnership between drug services and the police. International Journal of Drug Policy, 16(5), pp. 343-352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2005.06.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2005.06.008

IGARAPE, 2017-last update, Observatório de Homicídios. Instituto Igarapé. Available: https://igarape.org.br/apps/observatorio-de-homicidios [04/10, 2017].

INCIARDI, J.A. and HARRISON, L.D., 2000. Harm reduction: national and international perspectives. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452220680

Korf, D.J., Riper, H. and Bullington, B., 1999. Windmills in their Minds? Drug Policy and Drug Research in the Netherlands. Journal of Drug Issues, 29(3), pp. 451-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/002204269902900302 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002204269902900302

Kranenburg, M. and Vugts, P., 2012, 20 December. Roof, Executies en Raadselachtige Zaken. Het Parool, 8-9.

Lewins, A. and Silver, C., 2007. Using Software in Qualitative Research: A Step-by-Step Guide. London: SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857025012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857025012

Lipsky, M., 2010. Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Lister, S., Wincup, E., Barret, S., Seddon, T. and Traynor, P., 2007. Street policing of problem drug users. 1. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York Publishing Services Ltd.

Marlatt, G.A., 1998. Harm reduction: pragmatic strategies for managing high risk behaviors. New York: Guilford Press.

Mesquita, F., 2006. The health and social impacts of drugs in Brazil and Indonesia: What it means for development. Development Bulletin, 69, pp. 22-26.

Musheno, Michael C., Maynard-Moody, Steven., 2009. Cops, Teachers, Counselors: Stories from the Front Lines of Public Service. University of Michigan Press.

Punch, M., Kees Van, D.V. and Zoomer, O., 2002. Dutch “COP”: Developing community policing in The Netherlands. Policing, 25(1), pp. 60-79. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639510210417908 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/13639510210417908

Rigoni, R.Q., 2015a. Surveillance cultures, chains and holes in street level networking: dealing with drug users in Amsterdam (Netherlands) and Porto Alegre (Brazil). Surveillance & Society, 13(3/4), pp. 497-511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v13i3/4.5352

Rigoni, R.D.Q., 2015b. Between care and order : street-level workers' discretion and drug policies in Amsterdam (the Netherlands) and Porto Alegre (Brazil)., ISS International Institute of Social Studies, Erasmus University of Rotterdam.

Rodrigues, L., 2006. Controle penal sobre as drigas ilícitas: o impacto do priibicionismo no sistema penal e na sociedade, Universidade de São Paulo (USP).

Small, W., Kerr, T., Charette, J., Schechter, M.T. and Spittal, P.M., 2006. Impacts of intensified police activity on injection drug users: Evidence from an ethnographic investigation. International Journal of Drug Policy, 17(2), pp. 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2005.12.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2005.12.005

Urquhart, C., 2013. Grounded theory for qualitative research : a practical guide. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526402196

Van der Gouwe, D., Ehrlich, E. and Van Laar, M.W., 2009. Drug policies in the Netherlands. Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport; Ministry of Foreing Affairs.

Van Donk, W., Boekhoud, P., Van den brink, W., Fijnaut, C., Meyenfeldt, L.H., Van de Mheen, D., Rigter, H. and Van Vliet-Kuiper, A., 2009. New Emphasis in Dutch Drug Policy. Report of the Advisory Committee on Drugs Policy. The Hague: Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport.

Varanda, W. and Adorno, R.D.C.F., 2004. Descartáveis urbanos: discutindo a complexidade da população de rua e o desafio para políticas de saúde. Saúde e Sociedade, 13, pp. 56-69. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902004000100007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902004000100007

Vermeulen, E.C. and Walburg, J.A., 1998. What happens if a criminal can choose between detention and treatment: results of a 4 year experiment in The Netherlands. Alcohol & Alcoholism, 33(1), pp. 33-36. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.alcalc.a008344 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.alcalc.a008344

VWS, 2003. Drug Policy in the Netherlands. Basic principles and Enforcement in Practice. Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport (VWS).

Waiselfisz, J.J., 2012. Mapa da Violência 2012: A Cor dos Homicídios no Brasil. 1 edn. Brasília: Cebela, Flacso.

Wandekoken, K., Quintanilha, B. and Dalbello-Araujo, M., 2015. Biopolítica na assistência aos usuários de álcool e outras drogas. Revista Subjetividades, 15(3), pp. 389-397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5020/23590777.15.3.389-397

Yin, R.K., 2000. Case study research: design and methods. London: Sage Publications.