Formulation of Correctional System Model in Corruption Enforcement in Indonesia

Authors

  • Dinar Mahardika Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai, Indonesia
  • Tian Terima Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai, Indonesia
  • Kamal Fahmi Kurnia Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai, Indonesia
  • Aditya Erwin Pratama Universitas Pancasakti Tegal, Indonesia
  • Arif Zainudin Universitas Pancasakti Tegal, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.102

Keywords:

Penitentiary, Sentencing Systems, Social Sanctions.

Abstract

Corruption in Indonesia requires the right formulation. The rule of law and punishment system in Indonesia is still weak against criminals. This paper tries to find the right formula in punishing corruptors because the existing punishment system is still breakable and is deemed ineffective in preventing it. This paper belongs to a type of normative approach with a descriptive-analytical. This paper reveals that there are weaknesses in the rule of law in corruption compromise, resulting in increasing corruption every year. Data from ICW in 2018 shows that corruption is still considered a common crime, and the current punishment system does not reflect the firmness in determining the maximum punishment. It is exacerbated by the sale and purchase of facilities in prisons, which results in public distrust of the law. In other countries, Indonesia must be more severe in punishing bribery and corruption, including extraordinary crimes against the people. The conclusion in this paper is to formulate a religious and moral approach in punishing corruptors such as social sanctions, public humiliation, being a cleaning worker, life imprisonment, being exiled, taking political rights, even being humiliated in public so that it becomes a new formula in corrupt penalty system. 

References

Andi Hamzah. (2005). Corruption In Indonesia, Problems And Solutions. Bandung: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Atmasasmita, R. (2004). Around the Problem of Corruption: National Aspects and International Aspects. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Badjuri, A. (2011). The role of the corruption eradication commission (KPK) as an anti-corruption institution in Indonesia, 18(1), 84–96.

Bambang Waluyo. (2014). Optimization Of Corruption Eradication In Indonesia, 1(2), 169–182.

Chowdhury, F., & Audretsch, D. B. (2020). Do corruption and regulations matter for home country nascent international entrepreneurship ? The Journal of Technology Transfer. Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09797-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09797-3

Dreher, A., & Gassebner, M. (2013). Greasing the wheels ? The impact of regulations and corruption on firm entry, 413–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-011-9871-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-011-9871-2

Faidati, N., & Khozin, M. (2020). The Relevance of Administrative Accountability and Social Accountability and its Impact on Welfare Improvement : DIY Province Case Study, 5(April), 12–19.

Hartanti, E. (2005). Corruption. JAKARTA: Sinar Grafika.

Hutabarat Agust. (2009). Corruptio. JAKARTA: Sinar Grafika.

Personal, M., & Archive, R. (2013). Munich Personal RePEc Archive Compliance Audit of Anti-Corruption Regulations : A Case Study from Carpatistan Customs, (44693).

Rahman, F. (2011). CORRUPTION AT THE VILLAGE LEVEL. 3 Te, 13–14.

Ridwan Zachrie Wijayanto. (2009). Corruptio In Indonesia. JAKARTA: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Rothstein, B. (2008). Creating Political Legitimacy : Electoral Democracy versus Quality of Government. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1338615 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1338615

Sherlock, S., Defence, A., & Academy, F. (2015). Combating Corruption in Indonesia ? The Ombudsman and the Assets Auditing Commission COMBATING CORRUPTION IN INDONESIA ? THE, (June). https://doi.org/10.1080/00074910215532 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00074910215532

Sugiyono. (2012). Sugiyono, Research methods Kuantitatif Kualitatif Dan R&D. Bandung: ALFABETA.

Zainul, Muhammad, A. (2019). Corruption Of Licensing In The Course Of Regional Autonomy In Indonesia, 5, 887–896.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-26

How to Cite

Mahardika, D. ., Terima, T. ., Kurnia, K. F. ., Pratama, A. E. ., & Zainudin, A. . (2021). Formulation of Correctional System Model in Corruption Enforcement in Indonesia. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 10, 866–871. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.102

Issue

Section

Articles