Legal Reconstruction of State Institutionalities of State Commissions to Suppress the Potential of Institutional Authority Dispute
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.118Keywords:
Legal reconstruction, state institutions, authority, legal dispute, state commission.Abstract
The main problem of this research triggers by the fact that Indonesia fundamental constitutional system changed into the 1945 Constitution. The changes affected the structure and structural mechanism of state institutions. The main purpose of this study is to analyze the philosophical question of the basic root formed in the 1945 Constitution as a new constitution of Indonesia. Regarding the organization and institution of the state can be started by questioning the essence of power that is institutionalized or organized into the state. The results showed that it is also important to know how the principle of popular sovereignty is reflected in the structure and mechanisms of state and government institutions that guarantee the establishment of the legal system and the functioning of the democratic system. At the theory level in terms of state institutions, with the various state commissions, how the principle of popular sovereignty is organized into institutional functions can be patterned into state institutions that are equal and mutually balanced in forms of checks and balances. From a normative perspective, the sources of state institutional authority can be used as a reference in the structuring of state institutions by considering shifts and the development of state administration, especially with the state commissions that occurred after changes to the 1945 Constitution.
References
Abdel-Hadi, A. (2012). Culture, quality of life, globalization and beyond. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 50, 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.011
Arbani, T. S. (2018, June). Juridical analysis of the fourth branch of government in Indonesia constitutional structure. Wacana Hukum, 23(1), 19-37. https://doi.org/10.33061/1.jwh.2018.24.1.2996 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33061/1.jwh.2018.24.1.2996
Arjomand, S. A. (2003). Law, political reconstruction and con-stitutional politics. Journal International Sociology, 18(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580903018001002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580903018001002
Berggren, N., & Nilsson, T. (2015, May). Globalization and the transmission of social values: The case of tolerance. Journal of Comparative Economics, 43(2), 371-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2015.02.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2015.02.005
Bo'a, F. Y. (2018, March). Pancasila as the source of law in national law system. Jurnal Konstitusi, 15(1), 27-49. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1512 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1512
Clark, D. S. (2001). Legal systems, classification of. In N. J. Smelser, & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), pInternational Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 8684-8689). Pergamon. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/02765-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-043076-7/02765-0
ICCE UIN Jakarta Team. (2003). Democracy, human rights, madani society. Jakarta: UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.
Ismail MZ, H. (2019, September). The analysis of state institution structure change and state governance of the Republic of Indonesia based on 1945 Constitution before and after the amendment. Ganec Swara, 13(2), 258-269. https://doi.org/10.35327/gara.v13i2.90 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35327/gara.v13i2.90
Jundiani. (2010, June). The authority of state institution after the amandement of 1945 Constitution. De Jure, Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum, 2(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v2i1.45 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v2i1.45
Kelsen, H. (1973). General Theory of Law and State. New York: Russels & Russels.
Kim, H. (2019, October). Globalization and regulatory change: The interplay of laws and technologies in E-commerce in Southeast Asia. Computer Law & Security Review, 35(5), 105315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2019.03.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2019.03.009
Lutfi, M., & Satriawan, M. I. (2013). Observing the Public Information Commission. Malang: UB Press.
Muawanah, U., Yusuf, G., Adrianto, L., Kalther, J., Pomeroy, R., Abdullah, H., & Ruchimat, T. (2018, May). Review of national laws and regulation in Indonesia in relation to an ecosystem approach to fisheries management. Marine Policy, 91, 150-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.01.027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.01.027
Mukhlis. (2011). The authorities of state institutions in deciding and interpreting constitution after the fourth amendment of 1945 Constitution. Syiar Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, XIII(1), 46-66.
Mulyani, T. (2016, January). Normative review of the relation among the state institutions in the Republic of Indonesia constitutional structure based on 1945 Constitution: Before and after amendment. Humani, 6(1), 75-95. https://doi.org/10.26623/humani.v6i1.855 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26623/humani.v6i1.855
Nurhidayah, L., & McIlgorm, A. (2019, February). Coastal adaptation laws and the social justice of policies to address sea level rise: An Indonesian insight. Ocean and Coastal Management, 171, 11-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.01.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.01.011
Putra, S. G. M. S. R. (2020). Legal reconstruction of implementation legally binding verdict in industrial relations court. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 9(1), 99-115. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.9.1.2020.99-115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.9.1.2020.99-115
Raikhan, S., Moldakhmet, M., Ryskeldy, M., & Alua, M. (2014). The interaction of globalization and culture in the modern world. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 122, 8-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1294 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1294
Rishan, I. (2018, November). The relevance of inquiry right on the independent state commission. Dialogia Iuridica, 10(1), 44-64. https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v10i1.1031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.28932/di.v10i1.1031
Safi'. (2016). The political law of unification of the authority of the judicial review. Yogyakarta: Diva Press.
Wiriadinata, W. (2013). Komisi Yudisial dan Pengawasan Hakim di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 43(4), 530-545. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol43.no4.1502 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol43.no4.1502
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Policy for Journals/Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
Policy for Journals / Manuscript with Paid Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Publisher retain copyright .
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work .