Constitutional and Legal Regulation of State Authority Interaction on Citizen Appeals: Foreign Experience

Authors

  • Marina V. Markhgeym Belgorod State University, 85 Pobedy Street, Belgorod, 308015, Russian Federation
  • Galia G. Mikhaleva Perm State Humanitarian Pedagogical University, 24, Siberskaja Street, Perm, 614990, Russian Federation
  • Alevtina E. Novikova Belgorod State University, 85 Pobedy Street, Belgorod, 308015, Russian Federation
  • Dar'ya A. Klyagina Belgorod law Institute of MIA of Russia named after I. D. Putilin, 71 Gorky Street, Belgorod, 308024, Russian Federation
  • Tsvetan Georgiev Sivkov Sofia University «St. Kliment Ohridski», 15 Tsar liberator Blvd., Sofia,1504, Bulgaria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.94

Keywords:

Human rights, citizens’ appeal, public authorities, principle of interaction, separation of powers, unity of state power.

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to identify the foreign experience of constitutional legalization of the basic foundations of interaction between government bodies regarding citizens' appeals. The study was built based on a dialectical approach to the disclosure of legal phenomena and processes using general scientific (systemic, logical, analysis and synthesis) and private scientific methods. The claimed interaction becomes relevant in modern conditions because that there is the coordination of the interests between an individual and the state in this process that is demanded to strengthen democratic values. Systematization of foreign constitutional experience, which appears in the comparative legal aspect as part of the general human rights theory.

References

Bâli, A.Ü., & Lerner, H. eds. (2017). Constitution writing, religion and democracy. Cambridge University Press. UK. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107707443 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107707443

Baranov, P., Mamychev, A., Plotnikov, A., Vershinina, S., & Mychak, T. (2018). Interactive Communication And Modernization Technologies Of Governmental Administration In Modern Society: Main Contradictions And Directions Of Development. National Academy of Managerial Staff of Culture and Arts Herald, 1, 5-12

Bricker, B. (2017). Breaking the principle of secrecy: an examination of judicial dissent in the European constitutional courts. Law & Policy, 39(2), 170-191. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12072 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12072

Bruegel, J.W. (1953). The Right to Petition an International Authority. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 2(4), 542-563. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589300070822 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589300070822

Chaptykov, A.V. (2007). Ponyatie i klassifikatsiya sub''ektov prava na obrashchenie v organy konstitutsionnoy yustitsii [The Concept and Classification of Subjects of Right to Appeal to the Bodies of the Constitutional Justice]. Gos. vlast'i mestnoe samoupravlenie, 10, 21-24.

Epstein, L., & Walker, T.G. (2019). Constitutional Law for a Changing America: institutional powers and constraints. Cq Press. Washington, D.C., United States.

Gaeva, N. (2016). Principles of Interaction between State Bodies and Public Associations: A Theoretical Aspect. Law Rev. Kyiv UL, 2(11), 86.

Ginsburg, T. (2017). Written constitutions and the administrative state: on the constitutional character of administrative law. In Comparative administrative law. Edward Elgar Publishing. UK. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784718671.00011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784718671.00011

Habermas, J. (2008). The constitutionalization of international law and the legitimation problems of a constitution for world society. Constellations, 15(4), 444-455. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.2008.00510.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8675.2008.00510.x

Kelemen, K. (2017). Judicial Dissent in European Constitutional Courts: A Comparative and Legal Perspective. Routledge press. London. UK. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315590769 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315590769

Makogon, B., Markhgeym, M., Novikova, A., Nikonova, L., & Stus, N. (2018). Constitutional Justice in Circumstances of Public Authority Limits. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 7(2), 722-728. https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v7i2.1602 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v7i2.1602

Makogon, B.V., Markhgeym, M.V., Minasyan, A.A., Novikova, A.E., Yarychev, N.U. (2019). Logical classification of legal procedural restrictions. Revista Inclusiones, Númeroe Special, 6, 392-401.

Mancini, G.F. (2018). The making of a constitution for Europe. In The new European community. Routledge press. 177-194. London. UK. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429496189-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429496189-6

Mark Gregory, A. (1998). The Vestigial Constitution: The History and Significance of the Right to Petition. Fordham Law Review, 66, 2153-2232.

Massaro, T.M., & Milczarek-Desai, S. (2018). Constitutional Cities: Sanctuary Jurisdictions, Local Voice, and Individual Liberty. Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev., 50(1).

Minasyan, A., Markhgeym, M., Plohih, A., Lepeshkina, O., Rasskazov, V. (2019). Typical constitutional spheres of interaction among parliament chambers in the Asian countries. Revista Inclusiones, 6, Númeroe Special: 99- 105.

Morgan, B. (2017). Social citizenship in the shadow of competition: the bureaucratic politics of regulatory justification. Routledge press. London. UK. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315199375 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315199375

Official Home Page Of Constitutions of states (countries) of the world. 2020. From <http://worldconstitutions.ru/> (retrieved on 19 March 2020).

Padover, S.K. (1995). Living US Constitution. Plume press. New York. USA.

Plasser, F., Ulram, P., & Waldrauch, H. (2016). Democratic Consolidation in East-Central Europe. Springer press. New York. USA.

Rossum, R.A. (2018). American Constitutional Law, Volume II: The Bill of Rights and Subsequent Amendments. Routledge press. London. UK. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429495427 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429495427

Slaughter, A.M. (1995). International law in a world of liberal states. European journal of international law, 6(3), 503-538. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejil.a035934 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejil.a035934

Treskov, A.P., But’ko, L.V., Dzidzoev, R.M., Novikova, A.E., Solovyev, A.A. (2020). Constitutional Principles Of Judiciary: Peculiarities of Formalization In The Cis Countries. Cuestiones Políticas, 37(64), 73-81. https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3764.05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3764.05

Varghese, D. T. (2016). Omani Women and their Happiness: An Exploratory Study Based on GNH and SWLS Tool. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 4(1), 01-07. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2016.411 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2016.411

Weisman, A.J. (1994). Separation of Powers in Post-Communist Government: A Constitutional Case Study of the Russian Federation. Am. UJ Int'l L. & Pol'y, 10, 1365.

Zakharov, S., Chemshit, A., Novikova, A., Stus, N., & Zajceva, T. (2019). Justice independence: foreign constitutional experiences. Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores, 6(3), 81.

Zhadan, V.N. (2018). Legal basis for the implementation of the constitutional duties of man and citizen in Russia. Ural scientific Bulletin, 1(5), 57-66.

Downloads

Published

2022-04-05

How to Cite

V. Markhgeym, M. ., G. Mikhaleva, G. ., E. Novikova, A. ., A. Klyagina, D. ., & Georgiev Sivkov, T. . (2022). Constitutional and Legal Regulation of State Authority Interaction on Citizen Appeals: Foreign Experience. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 914–919. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.94

Issue

Section

Conference Proceeding Articles 2020