Motivation Factors for Political Consciousness Formation in the Modern World
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.99Keywords:
Global society, political consciousness, motivational structure, communication practice, public sphere.Abstract
The article deals with the problem of political consciousness formation in the global conditions of heterogeneous political structures, which generate a wide range of needs and interests of groups and individuals. The purpose of our study is to identify the motivational structure of the subject's consciousness formation in political structures of different types. Conceptual description of the motivational structure in socio-political systems requires complex application of various research methods. The authors utilize such methods as structural and functional analysis of the informational and social environment, the phenomenological analysis of the role of communicative practices in the public sphere driving the attitudes of mass consciousness in the process of political power legitimation. Empirical methods include public opinion polls. Following the typology of forms of political consciousness, it is possible to single out and to systematize objective system factors of the living environment and subject-oriented factors of consciousness manipulation in public policy. Remarkably, real social systems are characterized by the complex synthesis of elements from different types of political consciousness. The process of recognizing the legitimacy of power by an individual is defined by opposite motivational vectors of freedom and necessity and runs on the base of rational and emotional perception of the political situation. The unity of the diverse forms of political consciousness organization in the global society is based on the axiological consensus between cultures, between society and human, between state and person. These relations conceptually manifest in symbols that motivate individual and group consciousness to trust in power.
References
Almond, G. & Verba, S. (1963). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400874569 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400874569
Andrews, F.M. & Inglehart, R.F. (2005). The Structure of Subjective Well-Being in Nine Western Societies. In: Michalos A.C. (ed.) Citation Classics from Social Indicators Research. Social Indicators Research Series, vol. 26. Dordrecht, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3742-2_8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3742-2_8
Arnold, D. (2017). Civil society, political society and politics of disorder in Cambodia. Political Geography, 60, 23-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.03.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.03.008
Beresneva, Yu.V. (2017). Formation of the concept of "communication" in the socio-humanitarian cognition: content, structure, communication functions. Bulletin of the Moscow Regional State University. Series: Philosophical Sciences, 2017, 4, 6-20. https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-7227-2017-4-6-20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-7227-2017-4-6-20
Bykov, I.A., Balakhonskaya, L.V., Gladchenko, I.A. & Balakhonsky, V.V. (2018). Verbal aggression as a communication strategy in digital society. In S. Shaposhnikov & L. Sharakhina (Eds.) Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Communication Strategies in Digital Society Workshop, ComSDS 2018 (pp.12-14). St. Petersburg, Russia: IEEE Inc. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMSDS.2018.8354954 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/COMSDS.2018.8354954
Byl’eva, D.S. (2016). The Internet as a New Type of Space. St. Petersburg State Polytechnical University Journal. Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(244), 124-130. https://doi.org/10.5862/JHSS.244.15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5862/JHSS.244.15
Dian, M. (2017). Theorizing the Role of Collective Memory in International Politics. In Knott, G. (ed.) Contested Memories in Chinese and Japanese Foreign Policy (pp. 1-31). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102027-2.00001-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102027-2.00001-8
Drob, S. L. (2016). An axiological model of the relationship between consciousness and value. New Ideas in Psychology, 43, 57-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2016.02.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2016.02.002
Drury, J. (2015). Social Movements: A Social Psychological Perspective. In Wright, J.D. (Ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 447-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.24094-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.24094-4
Felipe-Redondo, Je. (2015). Class Consciousness. In Wright, J.D. (Ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 739-744. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.32017-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.32017-7
Fourcade, M., Lande, B., & Schofer, E. (2016). Political space and the space of polities: Doing politics across nations. Poetics, 55, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2015.12.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2015.12.002
Gadzhiev, K. S. (2016). Metamorphosis of ideology in the age of computer science. Moscow, Russia: University book.
Giddens, E. (2013). The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press
Ginges, J. (2019). The Moral Logic of Political Violence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.11.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.11.001
Heunks, F. & Hikspoors, F. (1995). Political Culture 1960-1990. In De Moor R. (Ed.) Values in Western Societies, 51-82.
Huntington, S. (2003). The Clash of Civilizations. Moscow, Russia: LLC Publishing House AST.
Ives, C. D., & Kendal, D. (2014). The role of social values in the management of ecological systems. Journal of environmental management, 144, 67-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.013
Luhmann N. (2004). Die Realitat der Massenmedien Niklas Luhmann fur Sozialwissenschaften I GWV Fachverlage Gmbh. Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90161-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90161-9
Matveevskaya, A. S., & Pogodin, S. N. (2017).The essence of cross-cultural conflict (Presentation of a problem). Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies, 33(1),115-118. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2017.112 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu17.2017.112
Ors, F. (2015). New Dimensions of Communication in a Globalizing World. Procedia economics and finance, 23, 910-914. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00323-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00323-8
Panarin, A.S. (2000). Political science. About the world of politics in the East and in the West. Moscow, Russia: University book.
Pikalov, G. A. (2004). Theory of political culture. St.Petersburg, Russia: BSTU.
Pile, S. (2019). Affect and ideology: The political stake of desire. Emotion, Space and Society, 31, 108-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2018.12.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2018.12.001
Shipunova, O.D., Timermanis, I.E. & Evseeva, L.I. (2014). Political System Legitimation in Network Society. Review of European Studies, 6(4), 69-73. https://doi.org/10.5539/res.v6n4p69 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/res.v6n4p69
Smelser, N. J., & Baltes, P. B. (Eds.). (2001). International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (Vol. 11). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Smith, D. N. (2017). Theory and Class Consciousness. In Thompson, M. J. (Eds). The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Theory (pp. 369-423). New York, N.Y. USA: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55801-5_18 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55801-5_18
Vasilenko, I.A. (2016). Political science. Moscow, Russia: Eksmo.
Vickers, T. (2015). Marxist Approaches to Social Work. In Wright, J.D. (Ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 663-669. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.28055-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.28055-0
Vyatr, E.Y. (1979). Sociology of political relations. M., Russia: Progress.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Policy for Journals/Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
Policy for Journals / Manuscript with Paid Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Publisher retain copyright .
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work .