Crimes against Justice under the Legislation of the States of the European Union

Authors

  • Andrii R. Vorobchak Department of Criminal Justice, Chernivtsi Institute of Law of the National University "Odesa Law Academy", Chernivtsi, Ukraine
  • Viktor V. Nalutsyshyn Department of Criminal Law and Procedure, Khmelnytskyi University of Management and Law named after Leonid Yuzkov, Khmelnitskyi, Ukraine
  • Volodymyr V. Nalutsyshyn Department of Criminal Law and Procedure, Khmelnytskyi University of Management and Law named after Leonid Yuzkov, Khmelnitskyi, Ukraine
  • Olena V. Popovych Department of Criminal Justice, Chernivtsi Institute of Law of the National University "Odesa Law Academy", Chernivtsi, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.173

Keywords:

Crime, justice system, European Union, legislation, Criminal Code.

Abstract

The countries of the European Union (EU) are united, but above all, each country is autonomous. EU Member States have different legislation on criminal offences. The EU authorities have already suggested the possibility of creating a single system for regulating legal provisions on criminal offences. Studying and comparing the legal systems and responsibilities for crimes against justice in individual countries will facilitate the analysis of the differences in the legislation of the EU countries. The purpose of this paper is to investigate crimes against justice in accordance with the laws of each individual European country. The paper considers the composition of such crimes, as well as the responsibility to which offenders can be brought in case of such crimes. The study uses the methods of analysis and synthesis, analyses legal provisions. General methods of scientific cognition used in this study include dialectical, historical, the Aristotelian method, method of systematic data analysis, formal legal method, method of legal modelling and comparative legal method. The study investigates the legal framework of European countries, in particular criminal codes and laws. This study systematises and groups the received information and data on criminal liability of judges for unlawful decisions. The European practices in punishing those who do not comply with court rulings and judgments are also analysed. A study of the legal system in individual EU countries will help distinguish between positive and negative aspects in the legislation. In addition, this study allows to consider and analyse the most effective laws, provisions, and principles that can be implemented in the current legal system of different countries of the world.

References

Arnaud, Philippe. 2017. “Does introducing lay people in criminal courts affect judicial decisions? Evidence from French reform”. International Review of Law and Economics 52: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2017.07.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2017.07.004

Bazhanov, Marco I., Yuriy V. Baulin, and Vyacheslav I. Borisov 2005. Criminal law of Ukraine. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter. 480 p.

Bohonyuk, Halyna.I. 2016. Criminal-legal characteristic of non-execution of a court decision. PhD dissertation. Lviv State University of Internal Affairs, Lviv. 201 p.

Criminal Code of the Czech Republic. 2009. Retrieved May 24, 2020(https://www.epravo.cz/top/zakony/sbirka-zakonu/zakon-ze-dne-8-ledna-2009-trestni-zakonik-17001.html).

Criminal Code of the Federal Republic of Germany. 1971 Retrieved May 24, 2020(https://www.legislationline.org/documents/ section/criminal-codes/country/28/Germany/show).

Criminal Code of the Republic of Latvia. 1998. Retrieved May 24, 2020 (http://law.edu.ru/norm/norm.asp?normID=1243424& subID=100106935,100106943,100106961,100107093#text).

Criminal Code of the Republic of Lithuania. 2000. Retrieved May 4, 2020 (http://law.edu.ru/norm/norm.asp?normID=1243877& subID=100107735,100107738,100107763,100107855#text).

Criminal Code of the Netherlands. 1881. Retrieved May 24, 2020 (https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-codes/country/12/Netherlands/show).

Criminal Code of the Republic of Poland. 1997. Retrieved May 24, 2020 (https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/ criminal-codes/country/10/Poland/show).

Criminal Code of the Republic of Slovenia. 2008. Available at https://www.legislationline.org/download/id/3773/file/SloveniaCC2008en.pdf (Accessed date 24.05.2020).

Criminal Code of the Slovak Republic. 2005. Retrieved May 24, 2020 (https://www.legislationline.org/download/id/8295/file/SlovakiaCPC2005excerptsen.pdf).

Criminal Code of the Spain. 1995. Retrieved May 24, 2020(https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-codes/country/2/Spain/show).

Danish Penal Code. 2005. Retrieved May 24, 2020 (https://www.legislationline.org/documents/section/criminal-codes/country/34/Denmark/show).

de Jonge, Boudewinjn. 2020. “Transfer of criminal proceedings: from stumbling block to cornerstone of cooperation in criminal matters in the EU”. ERA Forum. Retrieved May 4, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-020-00616-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-020-00616-8

Entin, Mark l. and Vadim V. Voynikov. 2019. “The problems of criminal law harmonization in the framework of the EU”. Russian Journal of Criminology 13(2): 311-321. https://doi.org/10.17150/2500-4255.2019.13(2).311-321 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17150/2500-4255.2019.13(2).311-321

Garoupa, Nuno and Peter Grajzl. 2020. “Spurred by legal tradition or contextual politics? Lessons about judicial dissent from Slovenia and Croatia”. International Review of Law and Economics 63: article number 105912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2020.105912 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2020.105912

Marcelo, Aebi F. and Мarc Balcells. 2008. “The Prosecution Service Function within the Spanish Criminal Justice System”. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 14: 311-331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-008-9069-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-008-9069-4

Mendez-Pinedo, Elvira M. 2020. “Constitutional pluralism and legal perspectivism in European Union law”. Juridical Tribune – Tribuna Juridica 10(1): 5-35.

Ochio, Ariadna H. 2016. “Implementation of the New EU Directive on Confiscation in Poland: The Challenge of Overcoming the Negative Historical Experiences of Confiscation Orders’. European Journal of Crime Criminal Law and Criminal Justice 24(1): 19-38. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718174-24012082 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718174-24012082

Panainte, Rodica. 2014. “The changes in the legislator's conception Reflected in the New Romanian Criminal Code”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 149: 691-695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.08.255 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.08.255

Romanian Criminal Code. 2014. Retrieved May 4, 2020(https://www.avocatura.com/ll491-noul-cod-penal.html).

Sinelnikov, Andrey.V. 2013. "Criminological aspects of crimes against public justice committed by prosecution authorities office holders”. Criminology Journal of Baikal National University of Economics and Law 2: 94-101.

Spector, Lyudmila A. 2014. “General characteristic of crimes against justice in administration of justice”. Life Science Journal 9(11): 307-309.

Szczucki, Krzysztof. 2018. “Ethical legitimacy of criminal law”. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 53: 67-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2018.03.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2018.03.002

Terpstra, Jan and Jelle Kort 2016. “Police officers’ trust in criminal justice”. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 47: 12-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2016.05.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2016.05.001

Downloads

Published

2022-04-05

How to Cite

Vorobchak, A. R. ., Nalutsyshyn, V. V. ., Nalutsyshyn, V. V. ., & Popovych, O. V. . (2022). Crimes against Justice under the Legislation of the States of the European Union. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 1526–1532. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.173

Issue

Section

Articles