Risks to the Human Rights Advocacy in African Constitutions

Authors

  • Marina V. Markhgeym Belgorod State University, 85 Pobedy Street, Belgorod, 308015, Russia
  • Evgeniy V. Aristov Perm State Humanitarian Pedagogical University, 24, Siberskaja Street, Perm, 614990, Russian Federation
  • Anna A. Bezuglya Belgorod State University, 85 Pobedy Street, Belgorod, 308015, Russia
  • Alevtina E. Novikova Belgorod State University, 85 Pobedy Street, Belgorod, 308015, Russia
  • Andrey B. Novikov St. Petersburg state University of Economics, St. Petersburg, 21 Sadovaya Street, 191023, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.283

Keywords:

Human and civil rights and freedoms, state, constitution, risk to human rights.

Abstract

This article presents the results of a comparative legal study of the texts of the constitutions of African states with a view to identifying the rules that minimize human rights risks. The research is based on a dialectical approach to the disclosure of legal phenomena and processes using general scientific (systematic and logical methods, analysis and synthesis) and specific scientific methods. African constitutions, in comparison with the constitutions of other states, and in particular European ones, contain a disproportionately large number of rules formalizing special human rights institutions. Typically, these are special councils, human rights commissions (Egypt, Morocco, and Tunisia) or certain categories of the population (three in Egypt, three in Morocco, one in the Central African Republic). In Morocco and Equatorial Guinea, both the Mediator and the Public Defender are established, respectively. The relevance of the study is due to the strategic objectives of creating a secure human rights status of the state, as well as the need to find and update theoretical, methodological, and practical approaches to protecting the rights and freedoms of a human and a citizen. Considering the rules of the African constitutional model of minimizing risks to human right advocacy, objectively in terms of quantity and quality, are considered hyperbolic.

References

Beck, U. (2009). World at Risk. Polity. 269 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-1762(09)70218-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-1762(09)70218-4

Belyaeva, G. S., Markhgeym, M. V., Novikova, A. E., Samsonov, V. N., & Tonkov, E. E. (2017). System of Legal Limitations on State Power: in Search of Criteria. Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, 7, 1934-1938.

Butko, L. V., Markhgeym, M. V., Novikova, A. E., Pozharova, L. A., & Tonkov, E. E. (2017). Personal Dignity in the European Legal Culture. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 6(4), 296-303. https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v6i4.1174 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v6i4.1174

Cardenas, D., Bermudez, C., & Echeverri, S. (2019). Is nutritional care a human right? Clinical Nutrition Experimental, 26, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yclnex.2019.05.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yclnex.2019.05.002

Cremer, S. (2019). How New Business Models Can Address Human Rights Risks in the Cobalt Supply Chain. Available at SSRN 3679885. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3679885 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3679885

Fasterling, B. (2017). Human rights due diligence as risk management: Social risk versus human rights risk. Business and Human Rights Journal, 2(2), 225-247. https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2016.26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/bhj.2016.26

Gelunenko, V. V., Markhgeym, M. V., Shadzhe, A. M., Tkhabisimova, L. A., & Veliev, E. E. (2019). Freedom of speech in constitutional binds of eastern European countries. Amazonia Investiga, 8(19), 403-407.

Gould, M., & Rablen, M. D. (2017). Reform of the United Nations Security Council: equity and efficiency. Public Choice, 173(1-2), 145-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-017-0468-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-017-0468-2

https://constitutions.ru/

https://worldconstitutions.ru/

Kornyushkina, A. Y., Markhgeym, M. V., Novikova, A. E., Doronina, O. G. N., & Zajcev, S. Y. (2017). Minimization of human rights risks: the constitutional legal experience of post-soviet states. Turkish online journal of design art and communication, 7, 352-356.

Kuksin, I. N., Tonkov, E. E., Safronova, E. V., Vasekina, E. M., & Shabalina, E. I. (2017). The constitutional experience of consolidation the human rights function of the state in the post-soviet space. Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, 7, 303-308.

Losilkina, L. O., Shadzhe, A. M., Tkhabisimova, L. A., & Zajcev, V. A. (2018). Formalization of guarantees of human and civil rights and freedoms in the constitutions of the Commonwealth of Independent States. https://doi.org/10.29042/2018-3682-3685 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29042/2018-3682-3685

Makarova, O. (2017). The modern context of the human development risks. Knowledge and Performance Management, 1, 27-35. https://doi.org/10.21511/kpm.01(1).2017.03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21511/kpm.01(1).2017.03

Makogon, B. V., Markhgeym, M. V., Minasyan, A. A., Novikova, A. E., Yarychev, N. U. (2019). Logical classification of legal procedural restrictions. Revista Inclusiones, 6, 395-401.

Makogon, B. V., Markhgeym, M. V., Novikova, A. E., Nikonova, L. I., & Stus, N. V. (2018). Constitutional Justice in Circumstances of Public Authority Limits. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 7(2), 722-728. https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v7i2.1602 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v7i2.1602

Novikova, A. E. (2011). Ponyatie i sushchnost' pravozashchitnyh riskov. Nauchnye vedomosti BelGU. Seriya: Filosofiya. Sociologiya. Pravo. 14 (109), 151-157. (In Russian)

Novikova, A.E. (2013). Zarubezhnyj opyt konstitucionno-pravovogo zakrepleniya polozhenij, napravlennyh na minimizaciyu pravozashchitnyh riskov. Probely v rossijskom zakonodatel'stve, 5, 16-21. (In Russian).

Popkova, E. G., Fetisova, O. V., Zabaznova, T. A., & Alferova, T. V. (2018, April). The modern global financial system: social risks vs. technological risks. In International Conference Project “The future of the Global Financial System: Downfall of Harmony” (pp. 1013-1019). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00102-5_107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00102-5_107

Shvec, YU.YU. (2019). Normotvorcheskie principy prava cheloveka na zdravoohranenie v konstituciyah zarubezhnyh stran. Problemy ekonomiki i yuridicheskoj praktiki, 6, 123-126. (In Russian)

Downloads

Published

2022-04-05

How to Cite

Markhgeym, M. V. ., Aristov, E. V. ., Bezuglya, A. A. ., Novikova, A. E. ., & Novikov, A. B. . (2022). Risks to the Human Rights Advocacy in African Constitutions. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 2347–2352. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.283

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)