Facilitating Access to Justice in the Area of Economic Competition Protection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.351Keywords:
Justice, economics, attitude, equality, competition.Abstract
The relevance of the study is determined by the fact that all types of competitive relations should be affected in the formation of business development programs and be based on the adoption of appropriate decisions by all parties of economic relations. The novelty of the study is determined by the fact that each of the participants in economic relations in some cases cannot receive concomitant protection, which is based on equal access to the functions and organs of justice, which are provided by public authorities as carriers of justice. The practical significance of the study is determined by ensuring fair competition to form the prerequisites for the development of the social environment.
References
Baker, Jonathan. 2002. “Mavericks, mergers, and exclusion: Proving coordinated competitive effects under the antitrust laws”. New York University Law Review 77(1):135-203.
Bradford, Anu, Adam Chilton, Katerina Linos and Alex Weaver. 2019. “The global dominance of European competition law over American antitrust law”. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 16(4): 731-766. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12239
Carstensen, Peter. 2016. “The complexity of conversing about entrepreneurship, innovation, and antitrust”. Antitrust Bulletin 61(4): 494-497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X16673947
Dalko, Viktoria and Michael Wang. 2016. “Why is insider trading law ineffective? Three antitrust suggestions”. Studies in Economics and Finance 33(4): 704-715. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEF-03-2016-0074
First, Harry, Eleanor Fox and Daniel Hemli. 2012. “The United States Competition Law System and the Country’s Norms”. In The Design of Competition Law Institutions: Global Norms, Local Choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199670048.003.0008
Foer, Albert and Randy Stutz. 2012. Private Enforcement of Antitrust Law in the United States. Washington: American Antitrust Institute. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857939609
Fromm, Jeffery and Robert Skitol. 2005. “Micro law: Update on the antitrust ghost in the standard-setting machine”. IEEE Micro 25(5): 77-79. https://doi.org/10.1109/MM.2005.99
Gortych, Joseph. 2002. “Antitrust and intellectual property”. Optics and Photonics News 13(2): 12-13. https://doi.org/10.1364/OPN.13.4.000012
Hsu, Shang-Lin. 2018. “Antitrust and inequality: The problem of super-firms”. Antitrust Bulletin 63(1): 104-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X18756145
Johnson, Bankole. 1997. “Converting new antitrust guidance into action”. Medical Group Management Journal 44(1): 22-26+62.
Leibenluft, Robert. 2015. “Antitrust and provider collaborations: Where we’ve been and what should be done now”. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 40(4): 847-874. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-3150100
Lemley, Mark. 1998. “Will the Internet Remake Antitrust Law?”. In Globalization of Intellectual Property in the 21st Century, edited by K. M. Hill. Seattle: CASRIP, University of Washington School of Law.
Markovits, Richard. 2016. Economics and the interpretation and application of US and EU antitrust law. Antitrust Bulletin 61(1): 3-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603X15625126
McAfee, Randolph, Hugo Mialon and Sue Mialon. 2008. “Private v. public antitrust enforcement: A strategic analysis”. Journal of Public Economics 92(10/11): 1863-1875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.04.005
Newman, John. 2019. “Procompetitive justifications in antitrust law”. Indiana Law Journal 94(2): 501-544.
Ping, Lin, Baldev Raj, Michael Sandfort and Daniel Slottje. 2000. “The US antitrust system and recent trends in antitrust enforcement”. Journal of Economic Surveys 14(3): 255-306. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00111
Ray, Amy and Christopher Wall. 2017. “Antitrust”. Pp. 1-28 in Litigation Services Handbook: The Role of the Financial Expert, edited by R.L. Weil, D.G. Lentz, E.A. Evans. New York: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119363194.ch31
Schmidt, Hedvig. 2009. Competition Law, Innovation and Antitrust: An Analysis of Tying and Technological Integration. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Steren, John and Bruce Stewart. 1996. “Antitrust implications of alternative delivery systems”. Official Publication of the Clinical Laboratory Management Association 10(5): 561-567.
Wendler, Michael, Bernd Tremml and Michael Luber. 2008. “Antitrust law in the European Community”. Pp. 377-385 in Key Aspects of German Business Law, Fourth Edition. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68577-7_30
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Policy for Journals/Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
Policy for Journals / Manuscript with Paid Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Publisher retain copyright .
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work .
