Career Networking as a Praxeological Communicative Practice of the XXI Century in Social Theory

Authors

  • Yana V. Zoska Department of Sociology and Social Work, Classic Private University, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine
  • Viktor M. Scherbyna Department of Sociology and Social Work, Classic Private University, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine
  • Viktor V. Kuzmin Department of Social Work and Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, "Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic" National University, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine
  • Oksana F. Stadnik Department of Humanities, Institute of Practical and Art-Management, National Academy of Culture and Arts Management, Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Olha V. Bondarenko Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanitarian, "Zaporizhzhia Polytechnic" National University, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.371

Keywords:

Career growth, communicative theory, career coaching, career interaction.

Abstract

Career networking as a praxeological communicative practice is little studied in terms of effectiveness. The lack of research into the emotional, motivational, psychological and career effects of networking necessitates a study of the relationship between the types of career networking and these effects. The effects of networking in achieving career success were identified based on the electronic confidential survey of 102 employees of Ukrainian companies. The results of assessing the relationship between career networking types and emotional, motivational, psychological and occupational effects indicate that the relationship between variables is medium, low or absent. Therefore, the career effect is not related to networking, according to employees, if there is an average level of connection between the emotional, motivational, psychological effects and different types of networking. The study proves the subjectivity of the assessment of career networking and its effects. The article reveals the perception of career development methods: networking is perceived negatively as a way to achieve professional goals, which underestimates career performance. At the same time networking is perceived positively as a way to maintain friendship, motivation and level of satisfaction. The article confirms the connection between the subjective assessment of networking and the perception of networking as a "dirty and dishonest" way to get a job, achieve professional goals or career growth. In general, the subjective assessment of career networking causes low professional effects, while the emotional, motivational, psychological effects may be overestimated due to the positive perception of such effects by respondents.

References

Abalkhail, Jouharah, and Barbara Allan. 2015. “Women’s career advancement: mentoring and networking in Saudi Arabia and the UK”. Human Resource Development International 18(2): 153-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2015.1026548

Casciaro, Tiziana, Francesca Gino, and Maryam Kouchaki. 2014. “The contaminating effects of building instrumental ties: How networking can make us feel dirty”. Administrative Science Quarterly 59(4): 705-735. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839214554990

Forret, Monica, and Thomas Dougherty. 2004. “Networking behaviors and career outcomes: Differences for men and women?” Journal of Organizational Behavior 25: 419-437. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.253

Greguletz, Elena, Marjo-Riitta Diehl, and Karin Kreutzer. 2018. “Why women build less effective networks than men: The role of structural exclusion and personal hesitation”. Human Relations 72(7): 1234-1261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718804303

Huang, Yin-Mei. 2016. “Networking behavior: from goal orientation to promotability”. Personnel Review 45(5): 907-927. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-03-2014-0062

Kuijpers, Marinka, Birgit Schyns, and Jaap Scheerens. 2006. “Career competencies for career success”. The Career Development Quarterly 55: 168-178. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2006.tb00011.x

Kuwabara, Ko, Claudius Hildebrand, Sheena Iyengar, and Xi Zou. 2019. Lay Theories of Networking Ability: Beliefs that Inhibit Engagement in Networking. New York: Columbia University. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2020.01.003

Kuwabara, Ko, Claudius Hildebrand, and Xi Zou. 2018. “Lay theories of networking: How laypeople’s beliefs about networks affect their attitudes toward and engagement in instrumental networking”. AMR 43: 50-64. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2015.0076

Lauren, Benjamin, and Stacey Pigg. 2016. “Networking in a field of introverts: The egonets, networking practices, and networking technologies of technical communication entrepreneurs”. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 59(4): 342-362. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2016.2614744

Linehan, Margaret, and Hugh Scullion. 2008. “The development of female global managers: The role of mentoring and networking”. Journal of Business Ethics 83(1): 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9657-0

Nadermann, Kristen, and SunHee Eissenstat. 2018. “Career decision making for Korean international college students: Acculturation and networking”. The Career Development Quarterly 66(1): 49-63. https://doi.org/10.1002/cdq.12121

Pomaz, Oleksandr, and Oleksandr Tovkaylo. 2015. “The concept of a personal brand, its identification and positioning”. Scientific Works of Poltava State Agrarian Academy. Economic Sciences 2(11): 204-209.

Ren, Shuang, and Doren Chadee. 2017. “Influence of work pressure on proactive skill development in China: The role of career networking behavior and Guanxi HRM”. Journal of Vocational Behavior 98: 152-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.11.004

Savickas, Mark. 2012. “Life design: A paradigm for career intervention in the 21st century”. Journal of Counseling & Development 90: 13-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-6676.2012.00002.x

Savickas, Mark. 2015. “Career Counseling Paradigms: Guiding, Developing, and Designing”. Pp. 129-144 in APA Handbooks in Psychology. APA Handbook of Career Intervention. Vol. 1. Washington: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/14438-008

Savickas, Mark, Laura Nota, Jérôme Rossier, Jean-Pierre Dauwalder, Maria Duarte, Jean Guichard, Annelies van Vianen. 2009. “Life designing: A paradigm for career construction in the 21st century”. Journal of Vocational Behavior 75(3): 239-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.04.004

Spurk, Daniel, Simone Kauffeld, Luisa Barthauer, and Nora Heinemann. 2015. “Fostering networking behavior, career planning and optimism, and subjective career success: An intervention study”. Journal of Vocational Behavior 87: 134-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.12.007

Taber, Brian, and Maureen Blankemeyer. 2015. “Future work self and career adaptability in the prediction of proactive career behaviors”. Journal of Vocational Behavior 86: 20-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.10.005

van Hoye, Greet, Edwin van Hooft, and Filip Lievens. 2009. “Networking as a job search behaviour: A social network perspective”. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 82(3): 661-682. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317908X360675

Wolff, Hans-Georg, and Klaus Moser. 2009. “Effects of networking on career success: A longitudinal study”. Journal of Applied Psychology 94: 196-206. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013350

Downloads

Published

2021-10-21

How to Cite

Zoska, Y. V. ., Scherbyna, V. M. ., Kuzmin, V. V. ., Stadnik, O. F. ., & Bondarenko, O. V. . (2021). Career Networking as a Praxeological Communicative Practice of the XXI Century in Social Theory. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 3048–3056. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.371

Issue

Section

Articles