Prospects of Culture, Science and Human in the Context of a Technocratic Tide of the Post-Industrial Era

Authors

  • E.L. Antonova Belgorod State Institute of Arts and Culture, 7 Korolev st., Belgorod, 308022, Russia
  • A.E. Taranova Belgorod Law Institute, Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation Named After I.D. Putilin, 71 Gorky st., Belgorod, 308022, Russia
  • E.A. Antonova Belgorod Law Institute, Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation Named After I.D. Putilin, 71 Gorky st., Belgorod, 308022, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.295

Keywords:

Post-industrial era, Technological order, ?ost-human, Post-science, Conceptual thinking. Download

Abstract

The main aim of the study is to investigate prerequisites, essence and possible consequences of deaxiologisation trends in culture and deanthropologisation tendencies in science which arose out in the post-industrial age. Globalization processes are of a great importance in deprivation the science in its technocratic mechanistic interpretation of its historically determined constructive “human-centric” potential that had been implementing through creation and development of spiritual foundations of a human and society. The new shape of science – techno-science – exists without general metaphysical basis, summarizing and generalizable epistemological principles and person-oriented beginnings. It becomes to signify the return to mechanism in the field of implementation of logical procedures and processes but in the new – technocratic – dimension. The “new” mechanism, unlike the “classic”, is not about reducing the nature of man, society and culture to their nature-centric grounds that base and depend on physical laws, but is about orientating to extrabiological and virtual technical analogies, so it makes one to point out comprehensive competition between the human and artificial intelligence in all fields of vital activity. The main points and conclusions have their grounds on analysis of the most significant stages of science development from classics to post-non-classics.

References

Andreev A.L. 2011. Technoscience // Philosophy of science, Vol. 16: 210-218. URL: http://www.intelros.ru/readroom/filosofiya-nauki/16/19276-tehnonauka.html

Born M. 1963. Physics in the life of my generation. M.: ???????????? ??????????? ??????????, 536 P.

Byrne, D. S. (2020). Understanding Class in the Post-Industrial Era-Thoughts on Modes of Investigation. Frontiers in Sociology, 5, 39. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2020.00039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2020.00039

Grant J. P. 1986. Philosophy, culture, technology: prospects for the future: Translated to Russian by V.V. Bibikhin] // The new technocratic wave in the West: Collection of articles. ?: 453 p.

Koyn D. 2017. This idea must die. Scientific theories that block progress: [collection: translated from English by Sergey Merinov and Pavel Mironov] / under edition of John Brockman. M.: AST publishing House: 736 p.

KuHn T. 2009. The Structure of scientific revolutions. URL: file:///C:/Users/%D0%95%D0%9B/AppData/Local/Temp/Temp1_14102088.a4.zip/14102088.a4.pdf

Loudan L. 1987. Science and values. URL: http://www.philsci.univ.kiev.ua/biblio/laudan.html.

Martynova, S. E. (2020). The Subjective Middle Class Of The Innovation Region Of Russia: Characteristics In The Context Of The Post-Industrial Approach. Astra Salvensis-revista de istorie si cultura, 8(Supplement), 211-234.

Orudzhev Z.M. 2004. The way of thinking of the era. – M.: URSS, 258 p.

Rozov A.A. 2010. Postculture and the highest measure of humanitarian self-defense. URL: https://www.litmir.me/br/?b=110376&p=1

Savrusheva M. 2008. The Concept of way of thinking of the epoch // Philosophy of science and technology] URL: https://www.gumer.info/bogoslov_Buks/Philos/savrush2/04.php

Stoletov A.I. 2014. ?he Essence of creativity and its types // International journal of cultural studies. - No. 4 (17): 43-52.

Sullivan, L. M. (2020). Wildlife governance in an era of social change: how science, politics, and culture influence conservation governance (Doctoral dissertation, Colorado State University).

Toffler E. 2008. Future Shock: Translated from English. M.: AST publishing House,557 p.

Hovstede G. 2002. Organizational culture. URL: http://www.nashaucheba. EN/v8114/

Yurevich A.V. 2011. Wrong future // Essay. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/nepravilnoe-buduschee

Additional Files

Published

2020-12-30

How to Cite

Antonova, E. ., Taranova, A. ., & Antonova, E. . (2020). Prospects of Culture, Science and Human in the Context of a Technocratic Tide of the Post-Industrial Era . International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 2434–2438. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.295

Issue

Section

Articles