Optimizing Sample Size for Accelerated Failure Time Model in Progressive Type-II Censoring through Rank Set Sampling

Authors

  • Ibrahim Alliu Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, USA
  • Lili Yu Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, USA
  • Hani Samawi Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, USA
  • Jing Kersey Jiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, USA https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7256-3978

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2025.14.09

Keywords:

Accelerated failure time model, Hazard ratio, Progressive Type-II censoring, Survival analysis

Abstract

Survival data is a type of data that measures the time from a defined starting point until the occurrence of a particular event, such as time to death from small cell lung cancer after diagnosis, Length of time in remission for leukemia patients, Length of stay (i.e., time until discharge) in hospital after surgery. The accelerated failure time (AFT) models are popular linear models for analyzing survival data. It provides a linear relationship between the log of the failure time and covariates that affect the expected failure time by contracting or expanding the time scale. This paper examines the performance of the Rank Set Sampling (RSS) on the AFT models for Progressive Type-II censoring-survival data. The Ranked Set Sampling (RSS) is a sampling scheme that selects a sample based on a baseline auxiliary variable for assessing survival time. Simulation studies show that this approach provides a more robust testing procedure, and a more efficient hazard ratio estimate than simple random sampling (SRS). The lung cancer survival data are used to demonstrate the method.

References

Balakrishnan N, Cramer E. The art of progressive censoring : applications to reliability and quality 2014; 645.

Helu A, Samawi H. On Marginal Distributions under Progressive Type II Censoring: Similarity/Dissimilarity Properties. Open J Stat 2017; 07: 633-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2017.74044

Biradar BS, Santosha CD, Wolfe DA. Ranked Set Sampling An Approach to More Efficient Data Collection. Statistical Science 2004; 19: 636-643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/088342304000000369

Balakrishnan N, Aggarwala R. Progressive Censoring. Progressive Censoring 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1334-5

Helu A, Samawi H, Alslman M. On Accelerated Failure Time Models Performance Under Progressive Type-II Censoring. Statistics, Optimization & Information Computing 2022; 10: 815-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19139/soic-2310-5070-1446

Estimating the Population Mean Using Extreme Ranked Set Sampling n.d. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 242939607_Estimating_the_Population_Mean_Using_Extreme_Ranked_Set_Sampling (accessed January 12, 2023).

Samawi H, Al-Saleh M, Saidy O. (PDF) On the matched pairs sign test using bivariate ranked set sampling: an application to environmental issues 2008. https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/228675925_On_the_matched_pairs_sign_test_using_bivariate_ranked_set_sampling_an_application_to_environmental_issues (accessed February 12, 2023).

Samawi H, Pararai M. On the optimality of bivariate ranked set sample design for the matched pairs sign test on JSTOR 2010:24–7. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43601141 (accessed February 9, 2023). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/08-BJPS010

Samawi HM, Al-Saleh MF. On regression analysis using bivariate ranked set samples. Metron 2002; 60: 29-48.

Samawi H, Al-Saleh M. On regression analysis using bivariate ranked set samples - Georgia Southern University 2002:29–48. https://scholars.georgiasouthern.edu/en/ publications/on-regression-analysis-using-bivariate-ranked-set-samples-4 (accessed June 2, 2023).

Samawi HM, Ahmed MS, Abu-Dayyeh W. Estimating the population mean using extreme ranked set sampling. Biometrical Journal 1996; 38: 577-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.4710380506

El-Sayed MA, Riad FH, Elsafty MA, Estaitia YA. Algorithms of Confidence Intervals of WG Distribution Based on Progressive Type-II Censoring Samples. Journal of Computer and Communications 2017; 05: 101-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/jcc.2017.57011

Elhag AA, Ibrahim OIO, El-Sayed MA, Abd-Elmougod GA. Estimations of Weibull-Geometric Distribution under Progressive Type II Censoring Samples. Open J Stat 2015; 05: 721-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2015.57072

Mahmoud MAW, Soliman AA, Ellah AHA, El-Sagheer RM. Estimation of Generalized Pareto under an Adaptive Type-II Progressive Censoring. Intell Inf Manag 2013; 05: 73-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/iim.2013.53008

Loprinzi CL, Laurie JA, Wieand HS, Krook JE, Novotny PJ, Kugler JW, et al. Prospective evaluation of prognostic variables from patient-completed questionnaires. North Central Cancer Treatment Group. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12: 601-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1994.12.3.601

Balakrishnan N, Cramer E. The art of progressive censoring: Applications to reliability and quality. The Art of Progressive Censoring: Applications to Reliability and Quality 2014; 1-645.

Balakrishnan N, Cramer E. Statistics for Industry and Technology The Art of Progressive Censoring Applications to Reliability and Quality 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-4807-7

Downloads

Published

2025-03-02

How to Cite

Alliu, I. ., Yu, L. ., Samawi, H. . ., & Kersey, J. . (2025). Optimizing Sample Size for Accelerated Failure Time Model in Progressive Type-II Censoring through Rank Set Sampling. International Journal of Statistics in Medical Research, 14, 86–99. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2025.14.09

Issue

Section

General Articles