A Hybrid Bayesian-PDE Constrained Optimization Framework for High-Dimensional Image Reconstruction

Authors

  • Mushtaq K. Abdalrahem College of Pharmacy, University of Al-Ameed, Karbala, Iraq and Department of Statistics, College of Administration and Economics, University of Kerbala, Karbala, Iraq
  • Zainab H. Abood Department of Statistics, College of Administration and Economics, University of Kerbala, Karbala, Iraq
  • Maryam Sadiq Department of Therapeutic of Nutrition, College of Health and Medical Techniques, AL-Zahraa University for Women

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2026.15.03

Keywords:

Hybrid Bayesian Inference, PDE-Constrained Reconstruction, Uncertainty Quantification, Inverse Problems, Medical Imaging

Abstract

High-dimensional image reconstruction problems in fields such as medical imaging, astrophysics, and remote sensing are typically ill-posed inverse problems affected by noise, under sampling, and imperfections in the physical forward model. Traditional methods for resolving these conflicts suffer from an inherent trade-off: pure physics-based PDE-constrained models impose physical consistency but are deterministic and do not represent uncertainty, and fully Bayesian models provide principled uncertainty quantification but tend to become computationally intractable in very high-dimensional spaces. In response to these challenges, we propose the Hybrid Bayesian - PDE Constrained Optimization Framework. The Hybrid Bayesian - PDE Constrained Optimization Framework leverages the physical fidelity of PDE-based forward models with the expressive capability of Bayesian inference to model uncertainty. The reconstruction problem is cast as an optimization problem whereby a variational or hierarchical Bayesian prior is combined with a PDE-constrained data fidelity term, and the optimization objective is solved by an efficient stochastic variational optimization scheme. Experiments using a representative CT example and MRI datasets demonstrated how the hybrid methods provided (i) better reconstructions, preserving fine structures for substantially undersampled data and robust performance in noise when compared to the pure physics model along with providing (ii) clinically meaningful pixel-wise uncertainty maps. These results support the view that the proposed hybrid method provides a principled, computationally efficient, reliable approach to the challenge of solving large-scale inversion problems, while addressing the fundamental limitations of both deterministic, physics-based methods and probabilistic Bayesian inversion.

References

Duplyakov VM, Morozov AD, Popkov DO, Shel EV, Vainshtein AL, Burnaev EV, Paderin GV. Data-driven model for hydraulic fracturing design optimization. Part II: Inverse problem. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 2022; 208: 109303.

Sun L. Scientific Machine Learning for Modeling and Discovery of Physical Systems with Quantified Uncertainty. University of Notre Dame 2023.

Brown A, Jones GL. Convergence rates of Metropolis–Hastings algorithms. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics 2024; 16(5): e70002.

Ganguly A, Jain S, Watchareeruetai U. Amortized variational inference: A systematic review. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 2023; 78: 167-215.

Xia W, Shan H, Wang G, Zhang Y. Physics-/model-based and data-driven methods for low-dose computed tomography: A survey. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 2023; 40(2): 89-100.

Hoppe F, Neitzel I. Convergence of the SQP method for quasilinear parabolic optimal control problems. Optimization and Engineering 2021; 22(4): 2039-2085.

Macdonald CM, Arridge SR, Munro PR. On the inverse problem in optical coherence tomography. Scientific Reports 2023; 13(1): 1507.

Tarvainen T, Cox B. Quantitative photoacoustic tomography: modeling and inverse problems. Journal of Biomedical Optics 2024; 29(S1): S11509-S11509.

Habring A, Holler M. Neural‐network‐based regularization methods for inverse problems in imaging. GAMM‐Mitteilungen 2024; 47(4): e202470004.

Lalchand V, Ravuri A, Lawrence ND. Generalised GPLVM with stochastic variational inference. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics 2022 (May): 7841-7864. PMLR.

Zhi-Han Y. Training latent variable models with auto-encoding variational Bayes: A tutorial. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.07818 2022.

Lugmayr A, Danelljan M, Romero A, Yu F, Timofte R, Van Gool L. Repaint: Inpainting using denoising diffusion probabilistic models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition 2022: 11461-11471.

Jo Y, Chun SY, Choi J. Rethinking deep image prior for denoising. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision 2021: 5087-5096.

Nickl R. Bayesian non-linear statistical inverse problems. Berlin: EMS press 2023.

Mukherjee S, Schönlieb CB, Burger M. Learning convex regularizers satisfying the variational source condition for inverse problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.12520 2021.

Guo Y, Cao X, Song J, Leng H, Peng K. An efficient framework for solving forward and inverse problems of nonlinear partial differential equations via enhanced physics-informed neural network based on adaptive learning. Physics of Fluids 2023; 35(10).

Adler J, Öktem O. Deep Bayesian inversion. Datadriven Models in Inverse Problems 2024; 31: 359-412.

Kamyab S, Azimifar Z, Sabzi R, Fieguth P. Deep learning methods for inverse problems. PeerJ Computer Science 2022; 8: e951.

Ahmed ST, Hefenbrock M, Tahoori MB. Tiny Deep Ensemble: Uncertainty Estimation in Edge AI Accelerators via Ensembling Normalization Layers with Shared Weights. In Proceedings of the 43rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design 2024 (October): 1-9.

Pillonetto G, Yazdani A. Sparse estimation in linear dynamic networks using the stable spline horseshoe prior. Automatica 2022; 146: 110666.

Minderer M, Djolonga J, Romijnders R, Hubis F, Zhai X, Houlsby N, et al. Revisiting the calibration of modern neural networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2021; 34: 15682-15694.

Métivier L, Brossier R. On the adjoint state method for the gradient computation in full waveform inversion: a complete mathematical derivation for the (visco-) elastodynamics approximation. Geophysical Journal International 2025; 240(2): 942-966.

Banholzer S. ROM-based multiobjective optimization with PDE constraints 2021.

De Souza VLT, Marques BAD, Batagelo HC, Gois JP. A review on generative adversarial networks for image generation. Computers & Graphics 2023; 114: 13-25.

Mena J, Pujol O, Vitrià J. A survey on uncertainty estimation in deep learning classification systems from a bayesian perspective. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 2021; 54(9): 1-35.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-30

How to Cite

Abdalrahem, M. K. ., Abood, Z. H. ., & Sadiq, M. . (2026). A Hybrid Bayesian-PDE Constrained Optimization Framework for High-Dimensional Image Reconstruction. International Journal of Statistics in Medical Research, 15, 28–40. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2026.15.03

Issue

Section

General Articles