Survival Functions in the Presence of Several Events and Competing Risks: Estimation and Interpretation Beyond Kaplan- Meier
Keywords:Survival analysis, competing risks, crude cumulative incidence, net survival, relative survival, breast cancer
Evaluation of a therapeutic strategy is complex when the course of a disease is characterized by the occurrence of different kinds of events. Competing risks arise when the occurrence of specific events prevents the observation of other events. A particular case is semi-competing risks when only fatal events can prevent the observation of the non fatal ones.
Kaplan-Meier is the most popular method to estimate overall or event free survival. On the other hand when a subset of events is considered and net survival is of concern, different estimators have been proposed. Kaplan-Meier method can be used only under the independence assumptions otherwise estimators based on multivariate distribution of times are needed. If causes of death are unknown, relative survival can approximate net survival only under specific assumptions on the mortality pattern.
Kaplan-Meier method cannot be used to estimate crude cumulative incidence of specific events.
The aim of this work is to present the survival functions used in competing risks framework, their non parametric estimators and semi parametric estimators for net survival based on Archimedean Copulas. This would be a help for the reader who is not experienced in competing risks analysis.
A simulation study is performed to evaluate performances of net survival estimators. To illustrate survival functions in presence of different causes of death and of different kind of events a numerical example is given, a literature dataset on prostate cancer and a case series of breast cancer patients have been analysed.
 Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Statist Assoc 1958; 53: 457-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452
 Tai P, Joseph K, El-Gayed A, Yu E. Long-term outcome of breast cancer patients with one to two nodes involved - application of nodal ratio. Breast J 2012; 18(6): 542-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tbj.12010
 Tsiatis A. A nonidentifiability aspect of the problem of competing risks. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1975; 72(1): 20-2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.72.1.20
 Hougaard P. Modelling multivariate survival. Scand J Stat 1987: 291-304.
 Kaishev, VK, Dimitrova DS, Haberman S. Modelling the joint distribution of competing risks survival times using copula functions. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 2007; 41(3): 339-361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2006.11.006
 Nelsen RB. An Introduction to Copulas. New York: Springer, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3076-0
 Martelli G, Boracchi P, Orenti A, et al. Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in older T1N0 breast cancer patients: 15-year results of trial and out-trial patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 2014; 40(7): 805-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2014.03.029
 Rutherford MJ, Dickman PW, Lambert PC. Comparison of methods for calculating relative survival in population-based studies. Cancer Epidemiol. 2012; 36(1): 16-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2011.05.010
 Ederer F, Axtell LM, Cutler SJ. The relative survival rate: a statistical methodology. Natl Cancer Inst Monograph 1961; 6: 101-21.
 Pohar Perme M, Stare J, Estève J. On estimation in relative survival. Biometrics 2012; 68(1): 113-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01640.x
 Moliterni A, Ménard S, Valagussa P, et al. HER2 overexpression and doxorubicin in adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21(3): 458- 62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2003.04.021
 Fine JP, Jiang H, Chappell R. On semi-competing risks data. Biometrika 2001. 88(4): 907-919. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biomet/88.4.907
 Kalbfleish JD, Prentice RL. The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data. 2nd ed. Hoboken, New Jersery: John Wiley and Sons; 2002.
 Marubini E, Valsecchi MG. Analysing Survival Data from Clinical Trials and Observational Studies. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons; 1995.
 Fine JP, Gray RJ. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc 1999; 94: 496-509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1999.10474144
 Ederer F, Heise H. Instructions to IBM 650 programmers in processing survival computations. Methodological note No. 10, End Results Evaluation Section, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda MD, 1959.
 Hakulinen T. Cancer survival corrected for heterogeneity in patient withdrawal. Biometrics 1982; 38: 933-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2529873
 Brenner H, Hakulinen T. On crude and age-adjusted relative survival rates. Journal of clinical epidemiology 2003; 56(12): 1185-1191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00209-9
 Slud EV, Rubinstein LV. Dependent competing risks and summary survival curves. Biometrika 1983; 70(3): 643-649. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.3.643
 Peterson AV, Bounds for a joint distribution function with fixed sub-distribution functions: Application to competing risks. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1976; 73(1): 11-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.73.1.11
 Peterson AV. Dependent competing risks: bounds for net survival functions with fixed crude survival functions. Environment International 1978; 1(6): 351-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0160-4120(78)90013-2
 Klein JP, Moeschberger ML. Bounds on net survival probabilities for dependent competing risks. Biometrics 1988: 529-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2531865
 Dignam JJ, Weissfeld LA, Anderson SJ. Methods for bounding the marginal survival distribution. Stat Med 1995; 14(18): 1985-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780141805
 Rivest LP, Wells MT. A martingale approach to the copulagraphic estimator for the survival function under dependent censoring. J Multiv Anal 2001; 79: 138-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmva.2000.1959
 de Uña-Álvarez J, Veraverbeke N. Generalized copulagraphic estimator. Test 2013; 22(2): 343-360. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11749-012-0314-2
 Brown BW, Hollander M, Korwar RM. Nonparametric tests of independence for censored data, with applications to heart transplant studies. Reliability and Biometry 1974: 327-54.
 Rotolo F, Legrand C, Van Keilegom I. A simulation procedure based on copulas to generate clustered multi-state survival data. Comput Meth Prog Bio 2013; 109: 305-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2012.09.003
 Byar DP, Green SB. The choice of treatment for cancer patients based on covariate information. Bulletin du cancer 1979; 67(4): 477-490.
 Kay R. Treatment effects in competing-risks analysis of prostate cancer data. Biometrics 1986: 203-211. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2531258
 Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year followup of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347(16): 1227-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa020989
 Mariani L, Salvadori B, Marubini E, et al. Ten Year Results of a Randomised Trial Comparing Two Conservative Treatment Strategies for Small Size Breast Cancer. Eur J Cancer 1998; 34(8): 1156-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(98)00137-3
 Veronesi U, Marubini E, Mariani L, et al. Radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery in small breast carcinoma: longterm results of a randomized trial. Ann Oncol 2001; 12: 997- 1003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1011136326943
 Resche-Rigon M, Azoulay E, Chevret S. Evaluating mortality in intensive care units: contribution of competing risks analyses. Crit Care 2006; 10(1): R5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc3921
 Kim HT. Cumulative incidence in competing risks data and competing risks regression analysis. Clin Cancer Res 2007; 13(2): 559-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1210
 Allemani C, Weir HK, Carreira H, et al. Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995-2009: analysis of individual data for 25 676 887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2). Lancet 2014 Nov 26; Available from http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/ PIIS0140-6736%2814%2962038-9/abstract
 Yen Yen F, Ahmad N, Kassim S. A multistate approach to estimating the net survival function in the presence of competing risks. Malays J Math Sci 2011; 5(1): 125-41.
 Peng L, Fine JP. Regression modeling of semicompeting risks data. Biometrics 2007; 63(1): 96-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00621.x
 Hsieh JJ, Huang YT. Regression analysis based on conditional likelihood approach under semi-competing risks data. Lifetime Data Anal 2012; 18: 302-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10985-012-9219-3
 Lo SMS, Wilke RA. A regression model for the copulagraphic estimator. Journal of Econometric Methods 2014; 3(1): 21-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jem-2012-0016
 Elandt-Johnson RC, Johnson NL. Survival models and data analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1980.
 Crowder MJ. Classical competing risks. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2001.
How to Cite
Policy for Journals/Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
Policy for Journals / Manuscript with Paid Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Publisher retain copyright .
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work .