Cost Assessment of Epidemiologic Surveys in Dentistry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2012.01.01.05Keywords:
Coefficient of variation, cost, dentistry, epidemiology, sample sizeAbstract
Objective: The aim was to assess the relationship between the variability of data, sample size (n) and costs involved in epidemiologic surveys of dental caries.
Research design and settings: In order to conduct this study, simulations of the variation in costs of hypothetic epidemiologic surveys were made and studied. Thus, all costs with reference to a survey were described and divided into two categories: fixed and variable.
Outcome measures: The following margins of sampling errors were analyzed; 5%, 10%, 12% and 15% and the coefficients of variation (CV) of sampled data evaluated were, 50%, 80%, 100% and 120%.
Results: The required sample size increased with the reduction in the margin of error. For a CV of 50%, considering an error of 5%, the sample size was 384; for the same CV and error of 10%, n was 96. Thus it was observed that the relationship of sample size between the errors of 5% and 10 % was 4 times higher. Whereas with regard to cost, when an error of 5% was adopted, this was approximately three times higher when compared with the error of 10%.
Conclusion: Thus, when planning sample calculation, it is important to consider the Coefficient of Variation and the coherent errors with the variables under study, thus avoiding overestimating the sample and, consequently, increasing the costs involved in the research. It is fundamental to consider the possibility of working with other margins of error, thereby maintaining scientific strictness and establishing adequate costs.
References
Szwarcwald CL, Damacena GN. Complex Sampling Design in Population Surveys: Planning and effects on statistical data analysis. Rev Bras Epidemiol 2008; 11(Suppl 1): 38-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-790X2008000500004
Pereira JCR. Tamanho de amostra: uma necessidade real ou um capricho cultural? Arteríola 2002; 4(1): 13-16.
[in portuguese].
Sedlmeier P, Gigerenzer G. Intuitions about sample size: The empirical law of large numbers. J Behav Decision Making 1997; 10: 33-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199703)10:1<33::AID-BDM244>3.0.CO;2-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199703)10:1<33::AID-BDM244>3.0.CO;2-6
Rana H, Andersen RM, Nakakono TT. ICS II USA Research Design and Methodology. Adv Dent Res 1997; 11(2): 217-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08959374970110020401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08959374970110020401
Hulley SB. Designing clinical research. 3rd ed. Philadelphia PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2007; pp. 63-72.
Vanderpool, H. The Ethics of Research Involving Human Subjects: Facing the 21st Century; 1996. Frederick, MD: University Publishing Group.
Hujoel P, DeRouen TA. Determination and Selection of the Optimum Number of Sites and Patients for Clinical Studies. J Dent Res 1992; 71(8): 1516-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00220345920710081001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345920710081001
Cochran WG. Sampling Techniques - Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics. 3rd edn. p51-88; 318-324. Canada: Willey 1977.
US Census Bureau. Technical Paper 63: Current Population Survey - Design and Methodology, Available from: http://www.census.gov/prod/2002pubs/tp63rv.pdf > accessed 07 November, 2011; pp. 14-7.
Woiler S, Mathias F. Projetos: Planejamento, elaboração, análise. 1st ed. São Paulo SP: Atlas 1986; pp. 115-118.
Meza AR, Angelis M, Britt H, Milles DA, Seneta E, Webb BC. Aust J Public Health 1995; 19: 34-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.1995.tb00294.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.1995.tb00294.x
Eldridge SM, Ashby D, Kerry S. Sample Size cluster randomized trials: effect of coefficient of variation of cluster size and analysis method. Int J Epidemiol 2006; 35: 1292-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyl129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyl129
Alves MCGP, Silva NN. Variance estimation methods in samples from household surveys. Rev Saúde Pública 2007; 41(6): 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102007000600008
Morgenstern H, Winn DM. Statistics Med 1983; 2: 387-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780020311 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780020311
Miettinen OS. Individual Matching with Multiple Controls in the Case of All-or-None Responses. Biometrics 1969; 25(2): 339-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2528794 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2528794
Meydrech EF, Kupper LL. Cost considerations and sample size requirements in cohort and case- control studies. Am J Epidemiol 1978; 107: 201-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112526
Brittain E, Schlesselman JJ, Stadel BV. Cost of case-control studies. Am J Epidemiol 1981; 114: 234-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113187
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 Juliana Gonçalves, Janice Paula, Glaucia Ambrosano, Fabio Mialhe, Antonio Pereira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Policy for Journals/Articles with Open Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
Policy for Journals / Manuscript with Paid Access
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Publisher retain copyright .
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post links to their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work .
