Utilization of Social Media Networks for Teaching Effectiveness in Tertiary Institutions of Cross River State, Nigeria: Implications for Learning and Practice in an Environment of Students with Intellectual Disabilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2025.13.01.7Keywords:
Twitter, Facebook, WhatsApp, Teachers, Teaching, Effectiveness, StudentsAbstract
Aim: This study examines the use of social media networks for teaching effectiveness in public tertiary institutions of Cross River State, Nigeria: Implications for learning and practice in an environment of students with intellectual disabilities. Four study objectives were stated to guide the research. Four research questions were formulated, and one hypothesis statement was made. A literature review was carried out based on the variables under study, as research gaps were also stated.
Method: The study utilize7d the descriptive survey research design. The study population comprised 2,800 academic staff of public tertiary institutions of Cross River State. The sampling techniques adopted for this study were the stratified random sampling technique and the accidental random sampling technique. A total sample of 560 respondents was selected from 2,800 academic staff of public tertiary institutions in Cross River State using 20% of the entire population. A validated 25-item four-point modified Likert scale questionnaire was the instrument used for data collection. The face and content validity of the instrument was established by experts in Test and Measurement from the University of Calabar, Calabar-Nigeria. The reliability estimates of 0.89 for the instruments were established using the Cronbach Alpha method. A descriptive analysis of frequency count, percentages, mean, and standard deviation was used to test the research questions.
Results: The results obtained from the data analysis revealed that there was a statistically significant joint relationship between the predictor variables (Twitter, Facebook, WhatsApp) and teachers' teaching effectiveness in tertiary institutions in Cross River State, Nigeria.
Conclusion: From the findings of this study, one can conclude that there was a statistically significant joint relationship between the predictor variables (Twitter, Facebook, WhatsApp) and teachers teaching effectiveness in tertiary institutions in Cross River State, Nigeria. Key statistical measures, including mean scores, standard deviation, and inferential tests such as Multiple Linear regression, indicate a positive correlation between social media utilization and improved instructional delivery. The findings suggest the need for inclusive digital strategies to maximize learning outcomes, emphasizing the importance of accessible and adaptive teaching approaches. These insights have critical implications for policy formulation, curriculum design, and pedagogical practices in higher education.
Recommendation: Based on the result of the study, it was recommended that since the utilization of social sites by teachers improves teaching effectiveness, learning institutions should enact regulations that will govern the proper and positive use of the various types of social media sites among teachers in institutions to promote teachers' teaching effectiveness.
References
Gikas J, Grant MM. Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media. Internet High Educ 2023; 19: 18-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.06.002
Purvis A, Rodger H, Beckingham S. Engagement or distraction: The use of social media for learning in higher education. Stud Engage Exp J 2023; 5(1): 1-5. Available online at http://shura.shu.ac.uk/12274/
Dabbagh N, Kitsantas A. Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. Internet High Educ 2021; 15(1): 3-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.06.002
Enang CE. The use of social media in collaborative professional development of business education teachers in Nigeria. Assoc Bus Educ Nigeria 2019; 1(2): 77-86.
Teens and social media: An overview, Pew Research Center’s internet & American Life Project 2019. Available at: (http://Perinternet.or)
Joinson G. Adolescents and the net: Internet use and well-being. Adolescence 2018; 42(168): 659-75.
Selwyn N. Making sense of young people, education and digital technology: The role of sociological theory. Oxf Rev Educ 2022; 38(1): 81-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2011.577949
Kaplan AM, Haenlein M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Bus Horiz 2020; 53(1): 59-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
Cavus N, Ibrahim D. A mobile tool for learning English words. Online Submiss 2018; 6-9. Retrieved from http://libezproxy.open.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=ED504283&site=ehost-live&scope=site.
Zhu C. Student satisfaction, performance, and knowledge construction in online collaborative learning. J Educ Technol Soc 2022; 15(1): 127-36.
Rousseau JMS, Puttaraju K. A study on the uses of social networking sites on young adults to infer on the different types of users. IOSR J Humanit Soc Sci 2017; 19(11): 39-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-191123951
Okereke CE, Oghenetega LU. The impact of social media on the academic performance of university students in Nigeria. J Educ Pract 2024; 5(33): 21-4.
Espinosa S, Laffey W, Whittaker D, Sheng E. Snapping, pinning, liking, or texting: Investigating social media in higher education beyond Facebook. Internet High Educ 2016; 44: 100707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100707
Rambe P. Critical discourse analysis of collaborative engagement in Facebook postings. Australas J Educ Technol 2022; 28(2): 295-314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.875
Irwin C, Ball L, Desbrow B, Leveritt M. Students’ perceptions of using Facebook as an interactive learning resource at university. Australas J Educ Technol 2022; 28(7): 1221-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.798
McCarthy J. Blended learning environments: Using social networking sites to enhance the first year experience. Australas J Educ Technol 2020; 26(6): 729-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1039
Kabilan MK, Ahmad N, Abidin MJZ. Facebook: An online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education. Internet High Educ 2020; 13(4): 179-87.
Ophus JD, Abbitt JT. Exploring the potential perceptions of social networking systems in university courses. J Online Learn Teach 2019; 5(4): 639-48.
Top E. Blogging as a social medium in undergraduate courses: Sense of community best predictor of perceived learning. Internet High Educ 2022; 15(1): 24-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.02.001
Deng L, Yuen AHK. Towards a framework for educational affordances of blogs. Comput Educ 2021; 56(2): 441-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.005
Deed C, Edwards A. Unrestricted student blogging: Implications for active learning in a virtual text-based environment. Act Learn High Educ 2023; 12(1): 11-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787410387725
Huang TC, Huang YM, Yu FY. Cooperative weblog learning in higher education: Its facilitating effects on social interaction, time lag, and cognitive load. Educ Technol Soc 2021; 14(1): 95-106.
Sim JWS, Hew KF. The use of weblogs in higher education settings: A review of empirical research. Educ Res Rev 2020; 5(2): 151-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.01.001
Junco R, Heiberger G, Loken E. The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. J Comput Assist Learn 2021; 27(2): 119-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00387.x
Dunlap JC, Lowenthal PR. Tweeting the night away: Using Twitter to enhance social presence. J Inf Syst Educ 2019; 20(2): 129-35.
Borau K, Ullrich C, Feng J, Shen R. Microblogging for language learning: Using Twitter to train communicative and cultural competence. Adv Web Based Learn ICWL 2019; 78-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03426-8_10
Kassens-Noor E. Twitter as a teaching practice to enhance active and informal learning in higher education: The case of sustainable tweets. Act Learn High Educ 2022; 13(1): 9-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787411429190
Evans C. Twitter for teaching: Can social media be used to enhance the process of learning? Br J Educ Technol 2024; 45(5): 902-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12099
Miri B, David BC, Uri Z. Purposely teaching for the promotion of higher-order thinking skills: A case of critical thinking. Res Sci Educ 2017; 37(4): 353-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9029-2
Umezulike AN, Nwagu CC. Extent of utilization of Twitter for enhancing academic learning by business education students in Anambra State, Nigeria. COOU J Educ Res 2024; 6(1): 344-56.
Norman R. Social networking teens more likely to drink use drugs. Retrieved from http://jjie.org/teens-on-facebook-morelikely-dring-or-use-drugs-study-finds/20/13 2019.
Wang Q, Chen W, Liang Y. The effects of social media on college students. MBA student scholarship 2021.
Murti W, Maya S. The effectiveness of the environmental learning model on students' motivation and learning outcomes. Lentera Pendidik J Ilmu Tarbiyah Keguruan 2021; 24(2): 255-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/lp.2021v24n2i8.
Al-Khalifa KS, AlMuhammadi FN, AlOraifi NY, Alkuwaiti EA, Aladinan BA, Alzahrani NM, Khusheim SA, Al-Johani MH. The pattern and use of Twitter among dental schools in Saudi Arabia. PLoS One 2022; 17(9). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272628
Reyna NS, Pruett C, Morrison M, Fowler J, Pandey S, Hensley L. Twitter: More than tweets for undergraduate student researchers. J Microbiol Biol Educ 2022; 23(1): 1-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00326-21
Mazman SG, Usluel YK. Modeling educational usage of Facebook. Comput Educ 2020; 55: 444-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.008
Facebook Press Room. Never gonna GIF you up: Analyzing the cultural significance of the animated GIF. Soc Media Soc 2021.
Lim YH. Facebook in Asia: Total users and age groups. Grey Rev 2020.
Kabilan MK. Facebook: An online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education. Internet High Educ 2020; 13: 179-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.07.003
Madge C. Facebook, social integration and informal learning at university: ‘It is more for socializing and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work.' Learn Media Technol 2019; 34(2): 141-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880902923606
Faudree MR. Is Facebook a useful tool for college students? 2019; 1-15.
Çoklar AN. Evaluations of students on Facebook as an educational environment. Turk Online J Qual Inq 2022; 3(2): 42-53.
Bernard RM, Abrami PC, Borokhovski E, Wade CA, Tamim RM, Surkes MA, et al. A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Rev Educ Res 2019; 79(3): 1243-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654309333844
Manca S, Ranieri M. Is Facebook still a suitable technology‐enhanced learning environment? An updated critical review of the literature from 2012 to 2015. J Comput Assist Learn 2016; 32(6): 503-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12154
Yudhiantara RA, Saehu A. Mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) in Indonesian Islamic higher education. IJELTAL Indones J Engl Lang Teach Appl Linguist 2017; 2(1): 21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v2i1.52
Amadi EA, Anireh UN, Nwobike A. Assessment of instructional media use in enhancing teaching and learning of accounting by business education students in the Niger Delta, Nigeria. Int Multidiscip Acad Res J 2019; 3(1): 24-39.
Mayangsari ID, Apriant A. Understanding communication among parents and teachers in WhatsApp A case study in Bandung, Indonesia. Malays J Soc Sci Humanit 2017; 2(2): 19-24. https://msocialsciences.com/index.php/mjssh/article/ view/40/40
Allen K, Jolly C, Barnes J. Using social media to engage and educate teen parents. J Ext 2016; 54(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.34068/joe.54.02.05
Bax S. The end of CLT: A context approach to language teaching. ELT J 2023; 57(3): 278-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.3.278
Motiwalla LF. Mobile learning: A framework and evaluation. Comput Educ 2017; 49(3): 581-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.10.011
Bere A, Rambe P. Using mobile instant messaging to leverage learner participation and transform pedagogy at a South African University of Technology. Br J Educ Technol 2023; 44(4): 544-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12057
Aicha S. Understanding academics’ adoption of learning technologies: A systematic review. Comput Educ 2014; 151.
Rambe G, Chipunza R. An overview of mobile-assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL 2023; 20(3): 271-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344008000335
Creswell JW. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 4th ed. SAGE Publications 2014.
Isangedighi AJ, Joshua MT, Asim AE, Ekuri EE. Fundamentals of research and statistics in education and social sciences. Calabar: university press 2012.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
