Discrepancy between Motor and Cognitive Control in Adults with Intellectual Disabilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6000/2292-2598.2014.02.02.2Keywords:
Motor control, cognitive control, intellectual disability, speed and accuracy.Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the relationship between motor and cognitive control in adults with intellectual disabilities (ID), focusing on two aspects, speed and accuracy.
Method: Participants were 62 adults with ID aged 20 to 47 years. Their intelligence quotients (IQ) ranged from 13 to 61. Nine of the adults with ID had Down syndrome, and 8 of the adults had autism. We conducted three tasks: seal affixation task, tray-carrying task, and the Matching Familiar Figures Test (MFFT). The seal affixation and tray-carrying tasks are motor tasks we devised that can separately measure the speed and accuracy of motor control. MFFT is a cognitive control task that can be used to evaluate cognitive styles, such as impulsive-reflective.
Results: Adults with ID showed high motor accuracy and similar motor speed regardless of their MFFT performance. That is, discrepancies between motor and cognitive control existed in adults with ID.
Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that some types of motor control problem may become unclear with growth. A longitudinal investigation focused on the motor skill development of persons with ID is therefore necessary.
References
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association 2000.
Connolly BH, Michael BT. Performance of retarded children, with and without Down syndrome, on the Bruininks Oseretsky test of motor proficiency. Phys Ther 1986; 66: 344-348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/66.3.344
Wuang YP, Wang CC, Huang MH, Su CY. Profiles of cognitive predictors of motor functions among early school-age children with mild intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res 2008; 52: 1048-1060. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01096.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01096.x
Vuijk PJ, Hartman E, Scherder E, Visscher C. Motor performance of children with intellectual disability and borderline intellectual functioning. J Intellect Disabil Res 2010; 54: 955-965. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01318.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01318.x
Ushiyama M, Hosokawa T, Okuzumi H, Tanaka A. Aimed movement control in individuals with mental retardation. Japan J Spec Educ 2002; 39: 115-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6033/tokkyou.39.115_2
Latash ML. Neurophysiological Basis of Movement. Second Edition. Champaign: Human Kinetics 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195333169.003.0007
Kokubun M. Are children with Down syndrome less careful in performing a tray-carrying task than children with other types of mental retardation? Percept Mot Skills 1999; 88: 1173-1176. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.1999.88.3c.1173 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1999.88.3c.1173
Hirata S, Okuzumi H, Kitajima Y Hosobuchi T, Kokubun M. Speed and accuracy of motor actions in persons with intellectual disabilities. J Educ Res 2010; 21: 58-70. (in Japanese with English abstract).
Hirata S, Okuzumi H, Kitajima Y Hosobuchi T, Kokubun M. Speed and accuracy of motor and cognitive control in children with intellectual disabilities. Int J Dev Disabil 2013; 59; 166-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/2047387712Y.0000000010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/2047387712Y.0000000010
Kagan J, Rosman BL, Day D, Albert J, Philips W. Information processing in the child: Significance of analytic and reflective attitudes. Psychol Mono 1964; 78: 1-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0093830 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093830
Rosey F, Keller J, Golomer E. Impulsive-reflective attitude, behavioural I nhibition and motor skills: Are they linked? Int J Behav Dev 2010; 34: 511-520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0165025409361009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025409361009
Diamond A. Close interrelation of motor development and cognitive development and of the cerebellum and prefrontal cortex. Child Dev 2000; 71: 44-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00117
Davis EE, Pitchford NJ, Jaspan T, McArthur D, Walker D. Development of cognitive and motor function following cerebellar tumour injury sustained in early childhood. Cortex 2010; 46: 919-932. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2009.10.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2009.10.001
Wassenberg R, Feron FJ, Kessels AG, et al. Relation between cognitive and motor performance in 5- to 6-year-old children: results from a large-scale cross-sectional study. Child Dev 2005; 76: 1092-1103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00899.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00899.x
Livesey D, Keen J, Rouse J, White F. The relationship between measures of executive function, motor performance and externalising behaviour in 5- and 6-year-old children. Hum Mov Sci 2006; 25: 50-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2005.10.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2005.10.008
Wright JC. The Kansas reflection-impulsivity scale for preschoolers. Cemrel, Inc. 1971.
Hirata S, Okuzumi H, Kitajima Y, Hosobuchi T, Kokubun M. Impulsivity – Reflection in persons with intellectual disabilities. J Educ Res 2011; 25: 99-107. (in Japanese with English abstract).
Das, JP. Planning: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Evidence. Psychol Res 1980; 41: 141-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00308652 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00308652
Johnston K, Madden AK, Bramham J, Russel A. Response inhibition in adults with autism spectrum disorder compared to attention deficit / hyperactivity disorder. J Autism Dev Disord 2011; 41: 903-912. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1113-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-1113-9
Sergent J. The cognitive-energetic model: an empirical approach to attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Neurosci Behav Rev 2000; 24: 7-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7634(99)00060-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7634(99)00060-3