Infinitive Forms and Conditional Mood of Verbs as a Means of Expressing a Concretizing Relation

Ramilya Kamilovna  Sagdieva; Damir Haydarovich  Husnutdinov; Ramil Hamitovich  Mirzagitov; Gulnat Tokenovna  Abikenova

doi:10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.285

Authors

Ramilya Kamilovna Sagdieva Institute of Philology and Intercultural Communication, Kazan Federal University, Russia
Damir Haydarovich Husnutdinov Institute of Philology and Intercultural Communication, Kazan Federal University, Russia
Ramil Hamitovich Mirzagitov Institute of Philology and Intercultural Communication, Kazan Federal University, Russia
Gulnat Tokenovna Abikenova Philology of KAZGUU University in Kazakhstan, Kazakh Humanitarianjuridical Innovation University, Kazakhstan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.285

Keywords:

Concretizing relation, conditional mood, infinitive, means of link, shades of meanings.

Abstract

A concretizing link is an expression of a specific relationship between concepts using a unique means of relation. Given that, affixes and forms of verbs have a particular place. This article considers the conditions of the infinitive (-ырга/-ергә/-рга) and the conditional mood of the verb (-са/-сә). These affixes in Tatar grammars as part of a subordinate predicate clause are inflectional forms, that is, linking words. The authors study these verb forms to express a concretizing relation and analyze the shades of meanings. A more profound analysis shows that these affixes express different relations between phenomena and connect the verb with other words. They are added to all the verbs and some parts of speech when in speaking. It must be said that the affixes of the conditional mood and, to some extent, the infinitive perform the same functions for the verb as the cases do for the noun. The primary research method is descriptive-analytical with its main components: observation, generalization, and interpretation. For a detailed analysis of the linguistic features of speech, a comparative historical method is also used, which allows for the determination of some tendencies in the development of the grammatical system of the national literary language. In the studies, comparative-typological and statistical methods are also applied.

References

Abdrakhmanova, A.А., Galiullina, G.R., Aidarova, S.H., Giniyatullina, L.M., Gainullina, G.F. (2016). Aspects of Tatar Ethnic Oriented Teaching as a Foreign Language. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods. Special Issue, 181-184.

Bacanli, E. (2019). Deviations from the generalized phonological rules in Turkic languages. Asian and African Studies, 28(2), 3-11.

Benjamin, S. (2020), Verb Concatenation in Asian Linguistics, Published in: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics.

Coker, W. (2014). Beyond Self Containment: On the Politics of Culture and Identity in a Glocal Society. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language. 2(1), 53-62.

Fernandez, J. (2020). Circularity in Searle’s Social Ontology: With a Hegelian Reply. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language. 8(1), 18-24.

Fox, N. (1998), How to Use Observations In a Research Project, Trent Focus for Research and Development in Primary Health Care How to Use Observations in a Research Project, Institute of General Practice, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, Produced By: Trent Focus Group.

Hudson, R. (1988), Coordination and grammatical relations. Journal of Linguistics 24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700011816 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700011816

Husnutdinov, D.H., Sagdieva, R.K., Mirzagitov, R.H., & Karipzhanova, G.T. (2019). Predicative and Sound-Supporting Words as a Component of the Specific Relation | [Palabraspredictivas y queapoyan el sonidocomo un componente de la relaciónespecífica]. Opcion, 35(22), 549-560.

Khakimov, B., Gataullin, R., and, Gilmullin, R.I. (2016). Grammatical Disambiguation in the Tatar National Corpus. EPiC Series in Language and Linguistics. 1(2), 228–231 https://doi.org/10.29007/jkgl DOI: https://doi.org/10.29007/jkgl

Khisamova, F.M. (2006). Tatar Morphology. – Kazan: Magarif, 335 p.

Osborne, T. (2006), Parallel conjuncts. Studia Linguistica 60, 1. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2006.00133.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2006.00133.x

Sagdieva, R.K. (2000). Affixes as the Means of Expressing Concretizing Relations in the Tatar Language: Dissertation for Candidate of Sciences in Philology. Kazan, 164 p.

Sanchez E.L (2018), Infinitives, San José State University Writing Center, www.sjsu.edu/writingcenter.

Shakirova, G.R., Kharisova, C.M., & Kharisov F.F. (2016). The Development of Language Competence of Students in the Study of Native Language Morphology. Journal of Language and Literature, ISSN:2078-0303, 7(1), 227-230.

Tumasheva, D.G. (1964). The Morphology of Modern Tatar. – Kazan: The KSU Press, 300 p.

Tumasheva, D.G. (1986). The Tatar Verb. – Kazan: The KSU Press, 181 p.

Ylikoski, Jussi (2003), "Defining non-finites: action nominals, converbs and infinitives" (PDF). SKY Journal of Linguistics. 16.

Yusupov, A.F. (2015). Specifics of Sufi and Islamic Terminology Use in the Poetry of the 19th Century. European Journal of Science and Theology, 11(5), 275-284.