Functional Role of Interjections of Tatar Language

Damir Haydarovich  Husnutdinov; Ramilya Kamilovna  Sagdieva; Ramil Hamitovich  Mirzagitov; Gulnaz Tokenovna  Karipzhanova

doi:10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.301

Authors

Damir Haydarovich Husnutdinov Institute of Philology and Intercultural Communication, Kazan Federal University, Russia
Ramilya Kamilovna Sagdieva Institute of Philology and Intercultural Communication, Kazan Federal University, Russia
Ramil Hamitovich Mirzagitov Institute of Philology and Intercultural Communication, Kazan Federal University, Russia
Gulnaz Tokenovna Karipzhanova Institute of Philology and Intercultural Communication, Kazan Federal University, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.301

Keywords:

Interjection, Emotiveness, Expressiveness, Emotive Vocabulary, Picture Of The World, Tatar Language.

Abstract

Recently, in studying the linguistic picture of the world, interest has been growing in the national originality of the perception of reality, the national specificity of the reflection of the world picture in the language. The linguistic picture of the world is not linguistic; it reflects cognitive reality due to history, culture, geography, and other factors within the objective world. This article, based on such general scientific research methods as induction, deduction, observation, analysis, and synthesis of empirical material, attempts to reveal the national identity of the emotional experiences of the Tatar people. The study's subject is the emotive lexicatic language, which makes it possible to formulate and evaluate the presented picture and conceptualization of the surrounding Tatars. As the results of this study confirm, a person in the Tatar language picture of the world and eastern linguistic culture is less dualistic than a European; his emotions and speech tend to be in harmony, mutually complementing each other. In life, in everyday life, and the feelings of the Tatars, there is a severe imprint of the traditions and canons of Islam. The importance of the study of emotive vocabulary lies in the fact that it allows you to identify the priorities of the Tatar language consciousness, as well as the features of the vision of the Tatars world, the representation of the image of a person and his world from the position of the universal in the phraseology of the Tatar language, and the position of national specific features. The study of the dynamic semantics of phraseological units of the Tatar language in the structure of meaning makes it possible to represent significance for the general theory of linguistic science.

References

Ayupova, R.A. (2015). The role of paradoxes in the formation of a phraseological unit as a linguistic sign. Philology and culture. Philology and Culture, 4(42), 35-40.

Barsalou, L.W. (2008), Grounded cognition, Annual Review of Psychology, 59. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639

Basnight-Brown D.M., & Altarriba, J. (2017), The Influence of Emotion and Culture on Language Representation and Processing, In book: Advances in Culturally-Aware Intelligent Systems and in Cross-Cultural Psychological Studies, Intelligent Systems Reference Library. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67024-9_19 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67024-9_19

Beauregard, M., Levesque, J., & Bourgouin, P. (2001), Neural correlates of conscious self-regulation of emotion, Journal of Neuroscience, 21. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-18-j0001.2001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-18-j0001.2001

Casasanto, D. (2008), Who’s afraid of the big bad Whorf? Crosslinguistic differences in temporal language and thought. Language Learning, 58, 1. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00462.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00462.x

Damasio, A. (1994), Descartes’ error, Emotion, reason, and the human brain, London: Picador.

François, A., Ponsonnet, M. (2013), "Descriptive linguistics”, In Jon R. McGee; Richard L. Warms (eds.). Theory in Social and Cultural Anthropology: An Encyclopedia. 1. SAGE Publications, Inc. pp. 184–187. ISBN 9781412999632.

Gabdrakhmanova, F.H., Sattarova, M.R., & Nurmukhametova, R.S. (2016). Traditions and customs as means of formation ofeating behavior of tatar people. Journal of Language and Literature, 7(2), 169-172.

Goddard, C. (2013), Semantic Analysis: An Introduction (2nd ed.), New York: Oxford University Press.

Gross, J & Barrett, L. F.(2011), Emotion generation and emotion regulation: One or two depends on your point of view, Emotion Review, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073910380974 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073910380974

Gross, J. (1998), Antecedent and response focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology, Journal of personality and social psychology, 74(1). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.224

Husnutdinov, D.H., Karipzhanova, G.T., Sagdieva, R.K., Mirzagitov, R.H. (2019). National and cognitive characteristics of comparisons. Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology,10(4), 304-308. https://doi.org/10.31901/24566764.2019/10.04.331 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31901/24566764.2019/10.04.331

Husnutdinov, D.H., Sagdieva, R.K., & Mirzagitov, R.H. (2016). Comparative constructions in G. Ibragimov's works. Journal of Language and Literature, 7(4), 42-45.

Husnutdinov, D.H., Sagdieva, R.K., Mirzagitov, R.H., Galiullin, R.R., Baidauletova, A.O. (2019). Phonetic and morphological analysis of word formation of tatar names. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 8(4), 56-61. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2019-0037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2019-0037

Khusnutdinov, D.Kh. Sagdieva, R.K., Nasipov, I.S., & Askhadullina, G.G. (2020). Emotional function of interjections of the Tatar language in creating a national picture of the world. Kazan Science, 2, 125-127.

Knickerbocker, H., Altarriba, J (2011), Bilingualism and the impact of emotion: the role of experience, memory, and sociolinguistic factors, . In: Cook, V., Bassetti, B. (eds.) Language and bilingual cognition, New York.

Krasavsky, N.A. (2008). Emotional concepts in German and Russian linguistic cultures. - M.: Gnosis, 373 p.

Kuhiwczak, P. (2014). Transculturation and Multilingual Lives: Writing between Languages and Cultures. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language. 2(2), 103-111.

Lakoff, G., & M. Johnson (1999), Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to western thought, New York: Basic Books.

Majid, A., M. Bowerman, S. Kita, D.B.M. Haun, & S.C. Levinson (2004), Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.01.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.01.003

Memetova A. S. (2018), Crimean Engineering and Pedagogical University (per. Uchebnyy, 8, Simferopol, the Republic of Crimea, Russian Federation, 295015).

Ochsner, K. N., Bunge, S. A., Gross, J. J. Gabrieli, J. D. (2002), Rethinking feelings: An fmri studyof the cognitive regulation of emotion, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892902760807212 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/089892902760807212

Orduli, A.V. (2012). Interjection as a means of representing the emotive component of the language. Cultural life of the South of Russia, 45(2), 93–95.

Pinker, S. (1997), How the mind works, New York: Norton.

Pulvermüller, F. & L. Fadiga (2010), Active perception: sensorimotor circuits as a cortical basis for language, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2811 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2811

Pulvermüller, F. (2005), Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1706 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1706

Rodionova, G.A. (2009). Emotional abstract vocabulary in the language of works M.Yu. Lermontov: a published summary of a dissertation of the candidate of philological sciences. - M.,.-- 23 p.

Rosch, E. (1973), Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90017-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90017-0

Salakhova, R.R., & Sibgaeva, F.R. (2014). Cross-linguistic differences as a type of lexical difficulties in Russian – Tatar translations. Journal of Language and Literature, 5(4), 325-328.

Shadrikov, V.D. (2002). Introduction to psychology: emotions and feelings. - M: Logos,. 156 p.

Shaykhieva, G.M. (1999). Communicative-pragmatic aspects of treatment: a published summary of a dissertation of the candidate of philological sciences. Kazan, - 22 p.

Sibgaeva, F.R, Zamaletdinov, R.R, & Zamaletdinova, G.F. (2015). Reflection of Tatar inner world through concepts. Journal of Language and Literature, 6(3), 115-118.

Sibgaeva, F.R., & Salakhova, R.R. (2014). Space in a world view of poetic phraseology of the Tatar language. Journal of Language and Literature, 5(3), 271-274. https://doi.org/10.7813/jll.2014/5-3/46 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7813/jll.2014/5-3/46

Sibgaeva, F.R., Salakhova, R.R., & Kirillova, Z.N. (2016). Problems of affixal homonymy in the tatar language. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, NO 300, Ahmadabad ST, Mashhad, Iran, December, 120-124.

Slobin, D. I. (1996). From "thought and language" to "thinking for speaking." In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Studies in the social and cultural foundations of language, No. 17. Rethinking linguistic relativity, Cambridge University Press. (Reprinted in modified form from "Pragmatics," 1 .

Sutton, T.M., Altarriba, J (2015), Color associations to emotion and emotion-laden words: a collection of norms for stimulus construction and selection. Behavior Res. Methods (2015). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0598-8

Sutton, T.M., Altarriba, J (2015), Color associations to emotion and emotion-laden words: a collection of norms for stimulus construction and selection, Behavior Res. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0598-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0598-8

Tatar National Corpus «Tugan Tel». URL:// http://web-corpora.net/TatarCorpus/search/index.php?interface_language=ru.

www.dictionary.com. Retrieved 2019-11-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv9hvsfz.8

Zagidulina, A.F., Gilazetdinova, G.Kh., & Islamova, E.A. (2016). Associative fields of lexemes "homeland" and "vatan" in russian and tatar linguistic consciousness. Journal of Language and Literature, 7(2), 289-292.

Zhu, L. (2017). Mirror Neurons and (Inter)subjectivity: Typological Evidence from East Asian Languages. International Journal of Society, Culture & Language. 5(1) , 103-117.