ijsmr

ijsmr logo-pdf 1349088093

Estimation of Parent-Sib Correlations for Quantitative Traits Using the Linear Mixed Regression Model: Applications to Arterial Blood Pressures Data Collected From Nuclear Families  Pages 59-68

Maha Al-Eid, Sarah AL-Gahtani and Mohamed M. Shoukri

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2020.09.07

Published: 03 November 2020


Abstract: A fundamental question in quantitative genetics is whether observed variation in the phenotypic values of a particular trait is due to environmental or to biological factors. Proportion of variations attributed to genetic factors is known as heritability of the trait. Heritability is a concept that summarizes how much of the variation in a trait is due to variation in genetic factors. Often, this term is used in reference to the resemblance between parents and their offspring. In this context, high heritability implies a strong resemblance between parents and offspring with regard to a specific trait, while low heritability implies a low level of resemblance. While many applications measure the offspring resemblance to their parents using the mid-parental value of a quantitative trait of interest as an input parameter, others focus on estimating maternal and paternal heritability. In this paper we address the problem of estimating parental heritability using the nuclear family as a unit of analysis. We derive moment and maximum likelihood estimators of parental heritability, and test their equality using the likelihood ratio test, the delta method. We also use Fieller’s interval on the ratio of parental heritability to address the question of bioequivalence. The methods are illustrated on published arterial blood pressures data collected from nuclear families.

Keywords: Genetic epidemiology, Familial correlations, Heritability, Linear Mixed normal models, Maximum Likelihood estimation, Estimating Ratio of parameters, Bootstrap Confidence interval.

Download

ijsmr logo-pdf 1349088093

Relationship between Pretreatment Serum Albumin Levels with the Risk of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma  Pages 69-82

Sabyasachi Mukherjee

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2020.09.08

Published: 31 December 2020


Abstract: Background: Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM) is a very rare and aggressive form of cancer. Recently it was found that pretreatment Serum Albumin (SA), the main circulating protein in blood is a significant prognostic factor for MPM patients. The objective of this present article is to show the relationship between pretreatment Serum albumin (SA) levels with the risk of MPM.

Methods: Generalized additive model (GAM), an advanced regression analysis method has been introduced here to find this mathematical relationship between the response variable (SA) and the cofactors.

Results: The main determinates of SA are identified - asbestos exposure, hemoglobin, disease diagnosis status (patients having MPM) are the factors having significant association with SA, whereas duration of asbestos exposure, duration of disease symptoms, total protein (TP), Pleural lactic dehydrogenise (PLD), pleural protein (PP), pleural glucose (PG) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are the significant continuous variables for SA. The non-parametric estimation part of this model shows Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and Glucose level are the significant smoothing terms. Additionally it is also found that, second and third order interactions between cofactors are highly significant for SA.

Conclusions: The findings of this present work can conclude that - serum albumin may play the role of a very significant prognostic factor for MPM disease and it has been established here through mathematical modeling. Few of the findings are already been exist in MPM research literature whereas some of the findings are completely new in the literature.

Keywords: Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma, Serum albumin, Gamma distribution, Generalized additive model, Probabilistic Modeling.

Download

ijsmr logo-pdf 1349088093

Socio- Demographic, Clinical and Lifestyle Determinants of Low Response Rate on a Self- Reported Psychological Multi-Item Instrument Assessing the Adults’ Hostility and its Direction: ATTICA Epidemiological Study (2002-2012)  Pages 1-9

Thomas Tsiampalis, Christina Vassou, Theodora Psaltopoulou and Demosthenes B. Panagiotakos

https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2021.10.01

Published: 1 February 2021


Abstract: Background: Missing data constitutes a common phenomenon, especially, in questionnaire-based, population surveys or epidemiological studies, with the statistical power, the efficiency and the validity of the conducted analyses being significantly affected by the missing information. The aim of the present work was to investigate the socio-demographic, lifestyle and clinical determinants of low response rate in a self- rating multi-item scale, estimating the individuals’ hostility and direction of hostility.

Methods: 3042 apparently healthy volunteers residing in the Athens metropolitan area participated in the ATTICA epidemiological study [1514 (49.8%) were men [46 years old (SD= 13 years)] and 1528 (50.2%) were women [45 years old (SD= 14 years)]]. Hostility and Direction of Hostility was assessed with the Hostility and Direction of Hostility (HDHQ) scale. Binary logistic regression with backward model selection was used in order to identify the key demographic, clinical and lifestyle determinants of higher non-response rate in the HDHQ scale.

Results: The vast majority of the participants (87.0%) had missing information in the HDHQ scale. Older age, lower educational level, poorer health status and unhealthy dietary habits, were found to be significant determinants of high nonresponse rate, while female participants were found to be more likely to have missing data in the items of the HDHQ scale.

Conclusions: The present work augments prior evidence that higher non-response to health surveys is significantly affected by responders’ background characteristics, while it gives rise to research towards unrevealed paths behind this claim.

Keywords: Missing data, Multi-item scale, Hostility, ATTICA study, Non-ignorable missingness.

Download

ijsmr logo-pdf 1349088093

Progression and Death as Competing Risks in Ovarian Cancer
Pages 249-254
Christine Eulenburg, Sven Mahner, Linn Woelber and Karl Wegscheider
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.6000/1929-6029.2013.02.04.1
Published: 31 October 2013Open Access


Abstract: Background: Progression of a cancer disease and dying without progression can be understood as competing risks. The Cause-Specific Hazards Model and the Fine and Gray model on cumulative incidences are common statistical models to handle this problem. The pseudo value approach by Andersen and Klein is also able to cope with competing risks. It is still unclear which model suits best in which situation.

Methods:For a simulated dataset and a real data example of ovarian cancer patients who are exposed to progression and death the three models are examined. We compare the three models with regards to interpretation and modeling requirements.

Results:In this study,the parameter estimates for the competing risks are similar from the Cause-Specific Hazards Model and the Fine and Gray model. The pseudo value approach yields divergent results which are heavily dependent on modeling details.

Conclusions:The investigated approaches do not exclude each other but moreover complement one another. The pseudo value approach is an alternative that circumvents proportionality assumptions. As in all survival analyses, situations with low event rates should be interpreted carefully.

Keywords: Multistate Models, pseudo values, cause-specific hazards, cumulative incidence, Fine and Gray model.
Download Full Article